亚色在线观看_亚洲人成a片高清在线观看不卡_亚洲中文无码亚洲人成频_免费在线黄片,69精品视频九九精品视频,美女大黄三级,人人干人人g,全新av网站每日更新播放,亚洲三及片,wwww无码视频,亚洲中文字幕无码一区在线


 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
The 5 best and 5 worst private equity funds
作者: Dan Primack    時(shí)間: 2010年09月20日    來(lái)源: 財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)
 位置:投資理財(cái)         
字體 [   ]        
打印         
發(fā)表評(píng)論        





????The California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) has the nation's largest private equity portfolio, and recently updated fund-by-fund performance data on its website. These are the numbers by which PE investors really are judged, so I figured it was worth a quick look to see the five best -- and five worst -- performing funds within the CalPERS portfolio.

????Because private equity is a long-term asset class characterized by J-curvature, I've excluded all funds raised between 2007 and 2010. The relevant metric is net IRR. All data is through March 31. Here goes:

????THE BEST:

????1. Clearstone Venture Partners 1-B (1999): 154.7%

????2. T3 Partners II (2001): 95.6%

????3. GCP California Fund (2003): 91.9%

????4. WLR Recovery Fund II (2002): 79.5%

????5. Permira Europe I (1997): 74.5%

????THE WORST

????1. Aberdare II Annex Fund (2006): -46.6%

????2. Exxel Capital Partners V (1998): -41.7%

????3. Opportunity Capital Partners IV: -28.9%

????4. Convergence Ventures II (1999): -28.5%

????5. Richardson Capital Private Equity 2 (2006): -28.1%




相關(guān)閱讀
用戶名: 密碼:      匿名


0條評(píng)論          查看更多評(píng)論