亚色在线观看_亚洲人成a片高清在线观看不卡_亚洲中文无码亚洲人成频_免费在线黄片,69精品视频九九精品视频,美女大黄三级,人人干人人g,全新av网站每日更新播放,亚洲三及片,wwww无码视频,亚洲中文字幕无码一区在线

立即打開
拉杰獲罪,,美國政府終獲勝

拉杰獲罪,,美國政府終獲勝

Katie Benner 2011-05-13
當(dāng)當(dāng)當(dāng)!美國政府終于將一個(gè)華爾街騙子送進(jìn)了監(jiān)獄,。在很多人將養(yǎng)老希望寄托于金融市場之時(shí),,這個(gè)騙子通過內(nèi)幕交易大量非法獲利。

????美國聯(lián)邦法庭一陪審團(tuán)本周三做出判決,對沖基金經(jīng)理拉杰?拉賈拉特南所受的所有14項(xiàng)共謀及欺詐罪指控均成立,;在這之前,,拉賈拉特南通過長期內(nèi)幕交易共獲利6,400萬美元。

????現(xiàn)年53歲的拉賈拉特南將面臨20年監(jiān)禁,?;蛟S很多人心里還在暗暗想,要是這輩子都出不來,,就更好了,。

????這是美國政府的一次高調(diào)勝利。說實(shí)話,,美國政府在對那些差點(diǎn)毀滅了全球市場,、謊話連篇的華爾街嫌犯宣戰(zhàn)以來一直缺乏持續(xù)跟進(jìn),,有時(shí)還被弄得灰頭土臉,。

????自從2008年迪克?福爾德和約瑟夫?卡薩諾將金融界帶至懸崖邊以來,,美國政府只提起了一宗高調(diào)訴訟,即指控貝爾斯登(Bear Stearns)兩位對沖基金經(jīng)理犯有欺詐和內(nèi)幕交易罪,。但說實(shí)話,,與其從保護(hù)投資者角度起訴這兩人,還不如起訴他們將次貸資金弄得一團(tuán)糟,。

????美國政府灰溜溜地輸?shù)袅诉@場官司,,兩天內(nèi)陪審團(tuán)都判定無罪。這次挫敗以及美國政府未起訴其他顯而易見的作惡者,,似乎讓其他罪犯壯起了膽子,。

????當(dāng)2009年拉賈拉特南被起訴時(shí),他放言自己無罪,。當(dāng)時(shí),,他管理的70億美元的Galleon對沖基金在投資科技和醫(yī)療保健業(yè)時(shí)如獲神助,。

????當(dāng)然,,現(xiàn)在我們知道了原因所在,。拉賈拉特南和他的同伙們當(dāng)時(shí)是利用了內(nèi)幕消息進(jìn)行投資——在從董事會和其他非公開渠道獲得利好/利空消息后,買入/賣出相關(guān)股票,。

????拉賈拉特南的辯護(hù)律師可笑地辯解,拉賈拉特南接到高盛(Goldman Sachs)及寶潔(Procter & Gamble)董事會成員在會議結(jié)束后不久打來的電話,,并非內(nèi)幕交易證據(jù),。他們聲稱,拉賈拉特南等人只是匯集了公開數(shù)據(jù),,拼湊成了信息雜燴或集錦,,任何有心人都能做到這一點(diǎn)。

????與貝爾斯登案不同,,這次陪審團(tuán)認(rèn)為絕不應(yīng)被表象所蒙蔽,。

????“在這個(gè)指控罪名如此多的案子的審判過程中,每項(xiàng)指控都進(jìn)行了充分辯論,,審判耗時(shí)漫長,,認(rèn)定被告人所有14項(xiàng)罪名均成立,說明陪審團(tuán)充分確信政府的指控,,”Baker Hostetler的白領(lǐng)辯護(hù)律師、此次擔(dān)任公訴人的喬納森?紐表示,。

????是的,,迪克、安吉洛和所有這些道貌岸然的家伙仍逍遙法外,,本案并不會讓這些人得到應(yīng)有的懲罰,。但本周三的宣判確實(shí)是一個(gè)好消息,畢竟我們中很多人的養(yǎng)老金在一定程度上還有賴于證券市場的回歸有序,,不能再被拉賈拉特南這樣貪婪,、膽大妄為的家伙所騙取,。希望對他的宣判不是這場風(fēng)暴的終結(jié),。

????A federal jury on Wednesday found hedge fund manager Raj Rajaratnam guilty of all 14 counts of conspiracy and fraud, after he scored $64 million in a long-running insider trading scam.

????Rajaratnam, 53, now faces 20 years in prison. Here's hoping they throw away the key.

????Because the decision hands the government a high-profile victory in what has been, let's face it, a rarely joined, often humiliating battle with the Wall Street creeps who nearly blew up the world and more than lived to tell the tale.

????Since the Dick Fulds and Joseph Cassanos of the world brought the financial world to the edge of the abyss in 2008, the feds had managed to bring just one high-profile case: a fraud-and-insider prosecution of two Bear Stearns hedge fund managers who were, let's say, less than forthcoming with their investors as they drove their subprime funds into the ground.

????The government lost that one in ignominious fashion, with the jury returning an innocent verdict in all of two days. That setback, and the government's failure to even bring cases against a whole cast of other obvious miscreants, seems to have emboldened other wrongdoers, as if they needed any prompting.

????When Rajaratnam was indicted in 2009, he defiantly declared his innocence. His Galleon hedge fund, with $7 billion in funds under management, was considered the smart money in tech and health care investing.

????We now know why, of course. Rajaratnam and his confederates were using insider information to bet on sure things -- buying stocks that would rise after news they gleaned from boardrooms and other nonpublic sources, selling those that were about to take a big hit.

????Rajaratnam's defense team argued, absurdly, that the calls Rajaratnam took from a board member at Goldman Sachs (GS) and Procter & Gamble (PG) shortly after meetings ended there weren't a sign of insider trading. No, they claimed, Rajaratnam et al. were simply assembling what you might call a melange -- perhaps a pastiche? -- of public data that anyone motivated enough could put together.

????In contrast to the Bear Stearns case, the jury this time found the good sense to see through this.

????"In a case where there are so many different counts, where those counts were so hotly contested, and where there was such a long trial, to see him found guilty on all 14 counts shows that the jury was totally convinced by the government's arguments," says Jonathan New, a white collar defense attorney at Baker Hostetler who worked as a prosecutor.

????So yes, Dick and Angelo and all those cool guys are still on the loose, and this case is not going to put any of them where they belong. But Wednesday's verdict is good news for those of us whose retirements depend in part on preventing securities markets from getting milked by greedy, nihilistic jerks like Rajaratnam. Let's hope his conviction isn't the end of that story.

掃描二維碼下載財(cái)富APP