營(yíng)業(yè)收入辨真?zhèn)?/strong>

Revenue is not revenue is not revenue

????But it's not as simple as just looking at revenue in dollar terms. For example, look at the following graph. You'll notice that although both companies have the same revenue every year, Company 1 has MUCH higher gross margins than Company 2 because the cost of sales (COGS) is much lower.

????銷(xiāo)售成本反映的是每筆銷(xiāo)售產(chǎn)生的成本。比方說(shuō),，如果是通過(guò)第三方經(jīng)銷(xiāo)商銷(xiāo)售產(chǎn)品,，后者抽取30%的銷(xiāo)售傭金，那么你的銷(xiāo)售成本將是營(yíng)收的30%（假定沒(méi)有其他銷(xiāo)售成本）,。

????上圖事實(shí)上比較典型,。公司1代表一家普通的軟件公司，產(chǎn)品采用直銷(xiāo)模式（由銷(xiāo)售代表銷(xiāo)售或直接在網(wǎng)上銷(xiāo)售）,。很多軟件公司的毛利潤(rùn)率都高達(dá)85-90%,，這也是為什么軟件行業(yè)多年來(lái)一直熱度不減。

????公司2可能代表一家“廣告中介公司”,，負(fù)責(zé)在出版商網(wǎng)站上發(fā)布廣告,，賺取廣告網(wǎng)絡(luò)支付的費(fèi)用，再將其中的85%支付給出版商,。這是典型的“中介公司”模式,，通常收取銷(xiāo)售額15-30%的傭金。

????它也可能是一家旅行網(wǎng)站,，通過(guò)銷(xiāo)售機(jī)票賺取傭金,。

????公司都喜歡看到高額的營(yíng)收數(shù)字，但這個(gè)數(shù)字可能具有誤導(dǎo)性,。試想,，假如賣(mài)了5億美元的美國(guó)聯(lián)合航空公司（United Airline）機(jī)票，這可不全是你的營(yíng)業(yè)收入,，你的營(yíng)業(yè)收入只是你獲得的7,，500萬(wàn)美元訂票傭金。

????它也可能是一家電子商務(wù)網(wǎng)站或“秒殺”網(wǎng)站,，記錄來(lái)自客戶(hù)的營(yíng)業(yè)收入,，但接下來(lái)必須將一大部分銷(xiāo)售收入支付給服裝生產(chǎn)商。許多電子商務(wù)公司事實(shí)上是中間人,。毛利潤(rùn)率介于15-40%之間不等,。

????我知道你在搖頭，心里不以為然,，但我敢保證,，即使是我認(rèn)識(shí)的一些最精明的人也會(huì)在“毛收入”和“凈收入”問(wèn)題上犯糊涂。我從“秒殺”網(wǎng)站的成長(zhǎng)中親眼目睹了這一點(diǎn),。

????人們總是說(shuō),，

????“X公司的營(yíng)業(yè)收入已經(jīng)達(dá)到了1億美元,！哇！了不起的增長(zhǎng),！”

????不是這么回事,。

????“X公司的毛收入為1億美元，但利潤(rùn)率僅為12%,，這意味著大部分收入反映的是商品貨值,。但這些公司很多在一開(kāi)始甚至都不擁有商品實(shí)物。因此,，事實(shí)上X公司的營(yíng)業(yè)收入是1,200萬(wàn)美元,。”這樣的營(yíng)業(yè)收入額本身也很不錯(cuò),，但與1億美元有本質(zhì)的區(qū)別,。”

????"COGS" represents the amount that each sale costs you. For example, if you sell your product through a third-party reseller who charges 30% of any sale then your COGS will be 30% of revenue (assuming no other costs of sales).

????The example chart is not actually atypical. The first company represents a normal software company that sells its products directly (either via sales staff or directly off of the internet). Many software companies have 85-90% gross margins, which is why it has historically been a very attractive industry.

????Company 2 might represent an "ad mediation company" where the company gets paid by ad networks for running ads on publisher websites and the company in turn must pay the publisher 85% of the revenue it collects. This is not atypical for "middle men" who often take 15-30% of the value of the sale.

??? This could also be a travel website who gets paid a bounty for selling airline travel.

????Companies like to have high numbers in their revenue column but this can be quite misleading. After all, if you sell $500 million of United Airline tickets that isn't really YOUR revenue. Your revenue is the $75 million you got paid in booking fees.

????It could be an eCommerce website or "flash sale" where they are booking revenue from customers but then having to pay out a high percentage of the sale to the clothing manufacturer. Many eCommerce companies are in fact, middle men. Gross margins can range from 15-40%.

????I know you're shaking your head and thinking, "duh" but I promise you that even some of the most sophisticated people I know get off track on this issue of "gross revenue" versus "net revenue." I saw this first hand with the growth of the "flash sale" category.

??? People kept saying,

????"Company X is already doing $100 million in revenue! Wow! Amazing growth!"

????Um, no,

????"Company X is doing $100 million in gross revenue but is only at 12% margins which means the majority of the value is in the goods. Many of these companies aren't even taking physical possession of the goods in the early days. So they are really doing $12 million in "revenue." That in and of itself is an achievement. But it's very different than $100 million in year years."