????5月15日,，英國(guó)國(guó)會(huì)召開一場(chǎng)會(huì)議,，探討希思羅機(jī)場(chǎng)的邊境控制問題，會(huì)場(chǎng)鋪著東方地毯,，擺著飾以王冠紋章的椅子,。內(nèi)政事務(wù)委員會(huì)主席提出了第一個(gè)問題：“該現(xiàn)象是最近才出現(xiàn)，還是說已經(jīng)持續(xù)了有一段時(shí)間,？”維珍大西洋航空公司（Virgin Atlantic）的運(yùn)營(yíng)主管回答道：“主席先生,，對(duì)我們和我們的乘客來說，數(shù)年來這一直是個(gè)問題,?！?/p>

????喬恩?斯圖爾特（美國(guó)脫口秀演員、電視主持人,，擅長(zhǎng)諷刺新聞事件與人物——譯注）何在,？他的英國(guó)同行呢？

????在英國(guó),，抨擊希思羅機(jī)場(chǎng)與評(píng)論天氣一樣司空見慣,。每日出版的小報(bào)特別擅長(zhǎng)撰寫關(guān)于“希思羅地獄”的頭條新聞，簡(jiǎn)直形成了一種藝術(shù),。倫敦前市長(zhǎng)肯?利文斯通曾于2007年發(fā)表著名評(píng)論,，稱希思羅機(jī)場(chǎng)將旅客扣為“囚徒”,。傳統(tǒng)上公眾憤怒的對(duì)象很大程度是擁有希思羅機(jī)場(chǎng)的私營(yíng)公司英國(guó)機(jī)場(chǎng)集團(tuán)（BAA），因?yàn)樗茨苎杆賹?shí)現(xiàn)機(jī)場(chǎng)設(shè)施現(xiàn)代化,。如今,，面對(duì)旅客們需在入境關(guān)口排上三小時(shí)長(zhǎng)隊(duì)的窘境，英國(guó)機(jī)場(chǎng)集團(tuán)轉(zhuǎn)而指責(zé)政府,，稱最近削減預(yù)算的決定和嚴(yán)格的護(hù)照檢查政策乃是旅客經(jīng)常在機(jī)場(chǎng)遭遇各種煩心事的真正原因,。

????人們或許會(huì)覺得英國(guó)機(jī)場(chǎng)集團(tuán)與政府雙方都有興趣展開合作——若希思羅機(jī)場(chǎng)運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)順暢，英國(guó)機(jī)場(chǎng)集團(tuán)與英國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)都將受益——可是,，相互推卸責(zé)任的政治風(fēng)氣,，使這家私人公司與政府官員之間更常見的是互相指責(zé)。上個(gè)月,，英國(guó)機(jī)場(chǎng)集團(tuán)甚至在護(hù)照檢查處發(fā)放傳單,，推卸自己的責(zé)任，并鼓勵(lì)旅客向政府方面投訴,。奧運(yùn)會(huì)還有三個(gè)月就召開了,，這場(chǎng)責(zé)任大戰(zhàn)卻方興未艾，令英國(guó)首相戴維?卡梅倫和倫敦市長(zhǎng)鮑里斯?約翰遜失望不已,。告訴那些沮喪的旅客們一個(gè)骯臟的秘密吧：短時(shí)間內(nèi)是不大可能有什么解決方案的,。

????“希思羅問題”備受關(guān)注至少已有十年了。倫敦于2005年贏得奧運(yùn)會(huì)主辦權(quán)之后,，英國(guó)機(jī)場(chǎng)集團(tuán)就拿出了一套希思羅機(jī)場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化方案,，不過該計(jì)劃遭到了媒體毫不留情的質(zhì)疑——當(dāng)時(shí)希思羅已經(jīng)擁擠不堪，英國(guó)航空（BA）還經(jīng)常爆發(fā)罷工,。如今,，盡管第五個(gè)航站樓已于2008年投入使用，希思羅機(jī)場(chǎng)兩條跑道的使用率仍然高達(dá)99.2%,。

????除了最近入境關(guān)口的亂象之外,，背后隱藏的問題是：英國(guó)機(jī)場(chǎng)集團(tuán)是否應(yīng)該建設(shè)第三條跑道，以緩解承載能力不足的問題,。該公司多年來一直就此游說政府,，但效果不佳。盡管英國(guó)機(jī)場(chǎng)集團(tuán)——其母公司為西班牙運(yùn)輸巨頭法羅里奧集團(tuán)（Ferrovial）——第一季度利潤(rùn)增長(zhǎng)了15%,，但其首席財(cái)務(wù)官指出,，除非希思羅機(jī)場(chǎng)增加一條跑道，否則真正的增長(zhǎng)無從談起,。

????這一立場(chǎng)并不出人意料,，畢竟機(jī)場(chǎng)的主要收入來源就是飛機(jī)起降費(fèi)，第三條跑道將會(huì)顯著增加其利潤(rùn)。此外,，法羅里奧集團(tuán)四年前還擁有英國(guó)全部七個(gè)重要機(jī)場(chǎng)的所有權(quán),，但之后在英國(guó)反壟斷部門的壓力下賣出了其中三個(gè)。

????On May 15, the British Parliament held a meeting about Heathrow's border control problem, in a gilded room with oriental rugs and chairs emblazoned with the crown. Here is the opening question, posed by the chair of the Home Affairs Committee: "Is this a recent phenomenon, or has it been going on for some time?" The response, from Virgin Atlantic's Director of Operations: "This has been a concern to us and our passengers for a few years now, Mr. Chairman."

????Could Jon Stewart please come forward? Where is his British equivalent?

????In the U.K., Heathrow-bashing is as common as commenting on the weather. The daily tabloids have made an art out of writing "Hell at Heathrow" headlines. Former mayor Ken Livingston famously commented in 2007 that Heathrow was keeping its passengers "prisoners." Much of the anger, traditionally, has been directed at BAA, Heathrow's private owner, for not modernizing fast enough. Now, faced with three-hour immigration lines, BAA is pointing its finger at the government, blaming recent budget cuts and strict passport controls for the nuisance the airport commonly causes passengers.

????Although one might assume that BAA and the government would have interests in cooperating -- a well-run Heathrow benefits BAA as well as the United Kingdom's economy -- the politics of responsibility has created a nasty blame game between the private company and members of the government. Last month BAA even-handed out leaflets at passport control deflecting responsibility and encouraging passengers to complain. The fight is on, three months ahead of the Olympics, to the dismay of Prime Minster David Cameron and London Mayor Boris Johnson. And the dirty secret is that frustrated travelers shouldn't expect a resolution any time soon.

????The "Heathrow problem" has been scrutinized for at least a decade. When London won its bid for the Olympics in 2005, BAA produced a plan to modernize Heathrow, though even at the time the press roundly doubted it. The airport was bursting at the seams and BA strikes were common. Today, even with the opening of a fifth terminal in 2008, the airport's two runways still operate at 99.2% capacity.

????Beyond the recent chaos at immigration, the issue lurking in the background is whether BAA should build a third runway to alleviate capacity concerns. The company has been lobbying the government for years, to no avail. Although BAA, which is owned by the Spanish transport group Ferrovial, posted a 15% rise in first-quarter profit this year, the company's CFO says that real growth won't be achieved unless Heathrow adds the extra runway.

????That's not a surprising stance, given that an airport makes the bulk of its money from charging airlines landing fees. A third runway would increase its profits considerably, and at a time when Ferrovial, which owned all seven major British airports as recently as four years ago, has been forced to sell three of them by Britain's competition regulator.