????迪赫拉說(shuō)：“這兩家公司競(jìng)爭(zhēng)如此激烈,，確實(shí)令人吃驚,。畢竟，作為飛機(jī)制造業(yè)的壟斷寡頭,，它們本可以相安無(wú)事,。”換句話說(shuō),，如果兩家公司停止?fàn)帄Z訂單的激烈競(jìng)爭(zhēng),，它們也就不必提供如此大的折扣。只是很可惜,，“在動(dòng)態(tài)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)形勢(shì)下,，這是不可能發(fā)生的。兩家公司之所以展開如此激烈的競(jìng)爭(zhēng),，原因之一是它們已經(jīng)不知道除此之外還有哪些方式可以贏得訂單,。”

????或許,，兩家公司可以把給客戶的折扣資金用來(lái)改進(jìn)未來(lái)的飛機(jī),。當(dāng)然，老對(duì)手之間的較量還會(huì)繼續(xù),。（財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)）

????譯者：劉進(jìn)龍/汪皓

????"It's kind of surprising that they fight so much because they could be a nice oligopoly," Dihora says. In other words, if the two companies quit competing so fiercely for orders, they wouldn't have to offer such steep discounts, he says. But unfortunately, "This is what happens in competitive dynamics. One of the reasons why they compete so aggressively is that they don't know how else to win an order anymore."

????Perhaps the two companies could spend the money they use on those discounts to improve the future of flight. But, of course, old rivalries die hard.