????萊希曾再次提出了自己的修正案,。但鑒于最高法院的裁決,，這個(gè)問題現(xiàn)在已經(jīng)沒有實(shí)際意義了。這項(xiàng)裁決將根據(jù)聯(lián)邦移民法向美國(guó)公民配偶提供的加速軌道,，允許同性戀,、雙性戀及變性美國(guó)人為其合法的婚姻伴侶作保，幫助他們獲得簽證,。

????盡管如此,，美國(guó)工商界支持《萊希修正案》的原則這一事實(shí)彰顯了公眾輿論的一個(gè)巨大轉(zhuǎn)變——越來越多的美國(guó)人支持同性戀者享有平等的法律權(quán)利?！爸档米⒁獾氖?，在這個(gè)問題上，全球公司是領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者,，”LGBT權(quán)利倡導(dǎo)團(tuán)體“移民平等”（Immigration Equality）執(zhí)行董事雷切爾?蒂萬說,。“是他們率先站出來表明立場(chǎng),，他們關(guān)心的只是一個(gè)人是否擅長(zhǎng)自己的工作,？”

????至少，麥克德維特?普格渴望回到美國(guó),。她想念美國(guó)的“創(chuàng)業(yè)機(jī)會(huì)”,。她在一封電郵中寫道：“向LGBT家庭開啟移民大門將遏制美國(guó)人才外流的趨勢(shì)?！保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng)）

????譯者：任文科

????Leahy had offered his amendment again. But with the court's decision, the issue is moot. The ruling will allow LGBT Americans to sponsor their legally married partners for visas under the expedited track federal immigration law provides for spouses of U.S. Citizens.

????Nonetheless, Corporate America's support of the principles of the Leahy Amendment highlights a massive shift in public opinion as more and more Americans support legal equality for gays and lesbians. "What's notable ... is that global companies are leaders" on this issue, said Rachel Tiven, Executive Director of Immigration Equality, an LGBT rights advocacy group. "They are way out front in saying that what they care about is, are you good at your job?"

????McDevitt-Pugh, at least, is eager to return to the United States. She misses the "entrepreneurial opportunities" available in America, she said in an email. "Opening up immigration to LGBT families [will] stop the brain drain of talented Americans."