????美國(guó)流媒體視頻網(wǎng)站Hulu不再掛牌出售,，幾家大牌媒體股東決定維持各自股份,，并增加7.5億美元現(xiàn)金投資。

????Hulu股東21世紀(jì)?？怂梗?1st Century Fox）,、NBC環(huán)球（NBCUniversal）和沃爾特迪士尼公司（The Walt Disney Co.）在一份聲明中稱(chēng)，Hulu目前每個(gè)月?lián)碛谐^(guò)3,000萬(wàn)唯一訪(fǎng)問(wèn)者,，提供來(lái)自400多家內(nèi)容合作伙伴的視頻服務(wù)。

????《華爾街日?qǐng)?bào)》（Wall Street Journal）上周初報(bào)道稱(chēng),，Hulu收到了3項(xiàng)最終收購(gòu)要約,。一項(xiàng)來(lái)自DirecTV，其他兩項(xiàng)均為聯(lián)合出價(jià)要約：分別來(lái)自美國(guó)電話(huà)電報(bào)公司（AT&T）和切寧集團(tuán)（Chernin Group）,，以及KKR集團(tuán)（Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.）和Guggenheim Digital Media公司,。此前的尋購(gòu)者還包括雅虎（Yahoo）、藝人經(jīng)紀(jì)機(jī)構(gòu)威廉?莫里斯奮進(jìn)娛樂(lè)公司（William Morris Endeavor）和私募公司銀湖資本（Silver Lake）,。

????“我想,，（Hulu股東們）幾個(gè)月前還真想把Hulu賣(mài)給出價(jià)最高的買(mǎi)主，但隨著他們收到更多的意向,，他們開(kāi)始給予Hulu更高的估值,。”據(jù)熟悉此事進(jìn)程的消息人士稱(chēng),?！坝悬c(diǎn)像是他們被人夸得心花怒放，開(kāi)始想留下Hulu,?！?/p>

????這種感覺(jué)有點(diǎn)像是2011年，當(dāng)時(shí)由于潛在買(mǎi)家擔(dān)憂(yōu)賣(mài)方將不再通過(guò)這個(gè)網(wǎng)站提供內(nèi)容,，Hulu流拍,。這一次，所有的出價(jià)都附有非常明確的,、與Hulu現(xiàn)有股東簽訂的內(nèi)容許可協(xié)議，但這些協(xié)議有很多限制,。這些限制使得最終出價(jià)者不多,，并將價(jià)格限制在了10億美元左右，而不是原本可能獲得的13億,、14億美元,。

????新聞稿沒(méi)有解釋Hulu將如何運(yùn)用7.50億美元的新增投資，以及新戰(zhàn)略合作伙伴關(guān)系是否已經(jīng)開(kāi)展,。有傳言稱(chēng),，Hulu可能為時(shí)代華納有線(xiàn)（Time Warner Cable）等第三方有線(xiàn)電視推出白標(biāo)平臺(tái),，據(jù)稱(chēng)這是康卡斯特（Comcast）CEO布萊恩?羅伯茨正在推進(jìn)的一項(xiàng)工作。另有傳言稱(chēng),，Hulu可能會(huì)用資金收購(gòu)更多的內(nèi)容和注冊(cè)用戶(hù)（因?yàn)樵摴菊龔膹V告支持模式轉(zhuǎn)向類(lèi)似流媒體公司Netflix的注冊(cè)用戶(hù)模式,。）

????Hulu的原始四大股東之一、私募股權(quán)公司Providence Equity Partners去年秋天將其10%的股份賣(mài)給了?？怂?、NBC和迪士尼，售價(jià)2億美元,。Providence起初的1億美元投資獲得了兩倍的投資回報(bào),，也使得Hulu的估值達(dá)到了20億美元，但這個(gè)估值并未被視為是拍賣(mài)的底價(jià),。（財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)）

????Hulu is no longer for sale, as the streaming video company's media owners have decided to maintain their shares and invest an additional $750 million in cash.

????In a statement, owners 21st Century Fox (NWS), NBCUniversal (CMCSA), and The Walt Disney Co. (DIS) said that Hulu now has more than 30 million monthly unique visitors for its service with videos from over 400 content partners.

????The Wall Street Journal had reported earlier this week that there had been three final acquisition offers for Hulu. One came from DirecTV (DTV), while the others were joint bids: one from AT&T (T) and Chernin Group, and another from Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (KKR) and Guggenheim Digital Media. Earlier suitors had included Yahoo (YHOO), talent agency William Morris Endeavor, and private equity firm Silver Lake.

????"I think that [Hulu's owners] were genuinely interested in selling the company to the highest bidder a couple of months ago, but they began to value what they had more as they got more inbound interest," says a source familiar with the process. "It was kind of like they were flattered, and it made them begin to want to keep it for themselves."

????This entire experience is a bit of a rerun for Hulu, which also ran a failed auction process back in 2011 after prospective buyers worried that the sellers would no longer offer their content via the site. This time around the bids were attached to very specific content licensing agreements with Hulu's current owners, but they were fairly restrictive. Such limits kept the final bidding group fairly small and also may have kept the price at the $1 billion range rather than the $1.3 billion or $1.4 billion that it may otherwise have garnered.

????The press release does not explain what Hulu will do with its $750 million windfall or if new strategic partnerships are afoot. There had been talk that Hulu could launch a white-labeled platform for third-party cable companies like Time Warner Cable (TWC) -- something Comcast CEO Brian Roberts was said to be pushing -- while Hulu also could use money to acquire additional content and subscribers (as it moves from an ad-supported model toward a more Netflix-like subscription model).

????One of Hulu's original four owners -- private equity firm Providence Equity Partners -- last fall sold its 10% stake to Fox, NBC and Disney for $200 million. That $2 billion valuation had been set via a 2x liquidation preference as part of Providence's original $100 million investment and was not viewed as any sort of floor for the auction process.