????不幸的是,，這并不是經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家們第一次警告全球范圍內(nèi)的房?jī)r(jià)泡沫。比方說(shuō),，加拿大房?jī)r(jià)上漲已經(jīng)讓當(dāng)?shù)毓賳T們擔(dān)憂了好幾年,。問(wèn)題是，在資產(chǎn)泡沫積累的過(guò)程當(dāng)中,，很難找到辦法解決,。監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)可以努力確保信貸不過(guò)于寬松，同時(shí)收緊借貸標(biāo)準(zhǔn),，但有些時(shí)候,，泡沫趨勢(shì)可以壓倒這些措施。消除泡沫唯一可靠的方式就是讓它破裂,，但這個(gè)辦法可能給那些經(jīng)濟(jì)不那么好的國(guó)家?guī)?lái)嚴(yán)重的后果,。

????或許，一個(gè)更值得探討,、同時(shí)也有助于政策制定者避開(kāi)未來(lái)房地產(chǎn)泡沫的問(wèn)題是,，為什么房地產(chǎn)領(lǐng)域目前存在這么多正在發(fā)酵的泡沫？或許,，我們可以參照一下經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家托馬斯?皮凱蒂的暢銷書(shū)《21世紀(jì)資本論》（Capital in the 21st Century）所引發(fā)的爭(zhēng)論,。

????皮凱蒂的這本書(shū)宣稱，不斷擴(kuò)大的收入不平等是資本主義體系的核心特點(diǎn),，因?yàn)橘Y本回報(bào)率總是高于經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)率,。結(jié)果是,，資本變得更加有價(jià)值，而較低的經(jīng)濟(jì)增速不足以讓那些不擁有資本（比如房地產(chǎn)或金融資產(chǎn)）的人變得更加富有,。最近幾周,，皮凱蒂論點(diǎn)的批評(píng)人士指出，他的論據(jù)有瑕疵,，因?yàn)檫^(guò)去20年資本價(jià)值的增長(zhǎng)大部分來(lái)自全球范圍內(nèi)的房地產(chǎn)價(jià)值增長(zhǎng),。如果正如以上分析所指出的那也難怪，房地產(chǎn)被高估,，那么,，皮凱蒂宣稱的資本回報(bào)正在增長(zhǎng)可能就是假象。

????但如果房地產(chǎn)沒(méi)有被高估呢,？如果經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)生了一些變化,，造成房地產(chǎn)升值呢？越來(lái)越多的研究正是這么認(rèn)為的：隨著發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)對(duì)農(nóng)業(yè)和制造業(yè)的依賴程度降低,，對(duì)于依托寶貴創(chuàng)意,、緊密合作的創(chuàng)新行業(yè)的依賴程度上升，土地再一次變得非常重要,。

????我們可以,，這一幕正在美國(guó)上演：舊金山、哥倫比亞特區(qū),、紐約和其他創(chuàng)新城市的房租正在隨同工資一起高漲,。在大多數(shù)高產(chǎn)勞動(dòng)者看到房地產(chǎn)價(jià)值上漲的環(huán)境中，人們想買房,、而不是租房不無(wú)道理,。那么，什么力量會(huì)阻止這個(gè)價(jià)格上漲的趨勢(shì)呢,？

????有這樣的解釋，大家有理由相信,，最近發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家房地產(chǎn)價(jià)格上漲既有理性因素（經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展使得位置變得更為重要）,，也有非理性因素（人們認(rèn)為沒(méi)有什么能阻止本輪上漲行情）。很難說(shuō)哪一個(gè)力量是推高房地產(chǎn)價(jià)格的更大因素,，但價(jià)格過(guò)去怎么樣并不意味著它未來(lái)就會(huì)繼續(xù)這樣,。

????換句話說(shuō)，或許我們認(rèn)為的泡沫實(shí)際上就是房地產(chǎn)市場(chǎng)在告訴我們,，決策層需要在經(jīng)濟(jì)最具活力的地區(qū)增加住房供應(yīng),。（財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)）

????Unfortunately, this isn’t the first time that economists have warned of housing bubbles around the world. Price increases in Canada have had officials worried for years, for instance. The problem is, it’s difficult to do anything about a growing asset bubble while it’s in progress. Regulators can work to make sure that credit isn’t too widely available and lending standards are tightened, but sometimes the logic of a bubble can overcome even these measures. The only reliable way to eliminate a bubble is to let it burst, which could lead to terrible consequences for the country’s economies in question.

????Perhaps a more interesting question, and one that could help policy makers avoid these real estate bubbles in the future, is why are there so many bubbles growing in this particular asset right now? For that it is useful to turn to the recent debate over economist Thomas Piketty’s best-selling Capital in the 21st Century.

????Piketty’s book alleges that growing income inequality is a central feature of capitalist systems, because the returns to capital will almost always be higher then economic growth. The result is that capital becomes ever more valuable, while there is not enough economic growth to make richer those who don’t own capital (like real estate or financial assets). Critics of economist Thomas Piketty’s thesis have argued in recent weeks that his argument is flawed because most of the run up in value of capital in the past 20 years is due to the run up in the value of real estate around the world. If real estate is overvalued, as the analysis above suggests, then Piketty’s claim that the return on capital is growing could be an illusion.

????But what if real estate isn’t overvalued? What if there is something happening in the economy that’s causing real estate to become more valuable? A growing body of research is arguing just that: As developed economies become less reliant on agriculture and manufacturing, and more reliant on creative industries that thrive on close collaboration for a generation of valuable ideas, land is becoming once again very important.

????We can see this happening in the U.S., where rents in cities like San Francisco, Washington D.C., New York and other innovative cities are skyrocketing along with salaries. In an environment where the most productive workers are seeing rapidly rising property values, it makes sense that people would want to buy a home rather than rent. After all, what force is going to stop this trend in rising prices?

????With this explanation, you have reason to believe that the recent run up in real estate prices in developed countries has both a rational component (the evolution of the economy is making location more important) and an irrational component (people think that nothing will stop this trend). It’s difficult to say which force could be a bigger factor pushing real estate prices higher, but it’s important to realize that just because prices have always behaved a certain way in the past doesn’t mean it will continue that way in the future.

????In other words, perhaps what we think is a bubble is really just the real estate market telling us that policy makers need to do more to allow more housing supply to be built where economies are most dynamic.