亚色在线观看_亚洲人成a片高清在线观看不卡_亚洲中文无码亚洲人成频_免费在线黄片,69精品视频九九精品视频,美女大黄三级,人人干人人g,全新av网站每日更新播放,亚洲三及片,wwww无码视频,亚洲中文字幕无码一区在线

訂閱

多平臺閱讀

微信訂閱

雜志

申請紙刊贈閱

訂閱每日電郵

移動應用

專欄 - 從華爾街到硅谷

風投出售公司數(shù)量減少不必擔心

Dan Primack 2014年01月08日

Dan Primack專注于報道交易和交易撮合者,從美國金融業(yè)到風險投資業(yè)均有涉及,。此前,,Dan是湯森路透(Thomson Reuters)的自由編輯,推出了peHUB.com和peHUB Wire郵件服務,。作為一名新聞工作者,,Dan還曾在美國馬薩諸塞州羅克斯伯里經營一份社區(qū)報紙。目前他居住在波士頓附近,。
2013年,,由風投出售的并購活動降至2009以來最低,相比2012年下降了僅四分之一,。但這沒什么好擔心的,。它表明,IPO市場走勢良好,,大家不舍得輕易出手有上市潛力的資產,。

????美國風險投資協(xié)會(National Venture Capital Association)和湯森路透(Thomson Reuters)日前公布的數(shù)據顯示,,去年風投通過并購方式只出售了388家公司。這是2009年以來的最低水平,,較2012年下降了近23%,。

????聽起來很糟糕。但事實或許并非如此,。

????IPO市場走勢強勁之時,,比如就像2013年,,風投資本家們通常都不愿通過出售來退出勢頭最好的公司。當然會有例外,,比如輕博客Tumblr作價11億美元賣給了雅虎(Yahoo),。但大多數(shù)優(yōu)秀的公司要么IPO,申請IPO,,要么預計在未來1,、2年內將進行IPO(比如,AirBNB,,Box,,Dropbox,Square,,Spotify,,等等)。

????這意味著大多數(shù)并購標的要么是中不溜的公司,,以低于面值價格出售,,要么是運營不善,以白菜價出售,。為什么這些交易只有25-35%公布了交易額,?這就是原因。沒人愿意公布投資(或收購)一家公司的價錢可能還不如我已有七年車齡的豐田普瑞斯(Toyota Prius),。

????但如果風投出售的公司數(shù)量少于過去多年,,可能事實上意味著風投的回報得到了提高。特別是,,如果公布交易的平均交易額仍相對健康(在1.61億美元左右),。不然,就是我的反直覺中有什么漏洞,?(財富中文網)???????????

????Venture capitalists sold only 388 companies via mergers or acquisitions last year, according to data released this morning by the National Venture Capital Association and Thomson Reuters. It is the lowest such total since 2009, and nearly a 23% decline from 2012.

????Sounds pretty bad. But it probably isn't.

????When the IPO market is strong, as it was in 2013, venture capitalists are typically loathe to exit their best companies via trade sales. Sure there are exceptions -- Tumblr to Yahoo (YHOO) for $1.1 billion, for example -- but most of the upper crust either went public, filed to go public or is expecting to go public within the next year or two (think AirBNB, Box, Dropbox, Square, Spotify, etc.).

????What that means is that most of the M&A targets either are middling companies being dumped around par, or failed companies being sold for scrap. That's why only 25-35% of these deals ever have their values disclosed -- no one wants to publicize having funded (or bought) a company that is now worth less than my seven-year-old Toyota Prius.

????So if VCs are selling fewer companies than in years past, then it may actually mean the VCs are generating higher returns. Particularly if the average value of disclosed deals remains relatively healthy (which it was, at around $161 million). Or is there a flaw in my counterintuition??????

我來點評

  最新文章

最新文章:

中國煤業(yè)大遷徙

500強情報中心

財富專欄