打算上市的科技公司都到哪去了,？
|
????納斯達(dá)克指數(shù)周一收于5000多點(diǎn),，這是自2000年科技泡沫破滅后納指首次沖上這一峰值。在一片繁華似錦中,，怎么不見(jiàn)科技公司IPO的身影,？ ????自年初迄今,，新上市的科技公司只有一家,，那就是云存儲(chǔ)服務(wù)供應(yīng)商Box。該公司1月底登陸股市,，融資1.75億美元,。隨后，就是一片沉寂,。 ????當(dāng)然,，新股IPO一直沒(méi)有間斷。今年前兩個(gè)月,，美股共完成29宗IPO,，雖然沒(méi)有去年同期的41宗那樣多，但其中不乏來(lái)自生物科技行業(yè)和房地產(chǎn)行業(yè)的公司身影,。不過(guò),，科技公司明顯缺席。 ????出現(xiàn)這種空缺的原因并不明確,，但最有可能要?dú)w結(jié)到晚期投資者身上,。不僅是傳統(tǒng)的像Institutional Venture Partners和Insight Venture Partners這樣的風(fēng)投公司在深挖私募市場(chǎng)，就連各類對(duì)沖基金和共同基金也越來(lái)越多地涌入這個(gè)市場(chǎng),，以獲取一丁點(diǎn)額外收益（也可能是因?yàn)樗麄兲珶o(wú)聊了,，拋硬幣決定的）。在私募資金充足的情況下,，公司為什么要上市呢,？當(dāng)一家“200億美元公司”不是更好嗎？既沒(méi)有討厭的股票買賣，也不會(huì)因此在一下午就變成一家“150億美元公司”（甚至更慘）,。 ????具有諷刺意味的是,，引發(fā)新一輪私募投資潮的是《創(chuàng)業(yè)企業(yè)融資法案》（JOBS ACT），而制定該法案的初衷之一卻是鼓勵(lì)更多初創(chuàng)型企業(yè)上市,。 ????短期內(nèi),，除了手續(xù)費(fèi)收入暫時(shí)斷流的投行人士和股票交易所外，科技公司不愿上市的現(xiàn)象對(duì)其他人沒(méi)有任何影響,。但長(zhǎng)期來(lái)看,，這種情況意味著散戶投資者不能再像以前那樣，在科技公司上市后的幾個(gè)月乃至幾年里分享其迅猛增長(zhǎng)所帶來(lái)的收益,。 ????因此,，如果大家在短時(shí)間內(nèi)湊巧碰到了某家科技公司的上市，請(qǐng)務(wù)必予以關(guān)注,。在下一宗科技公司IPO出現(xiàn)之前,，我們或許要等上一段時(shí)間了。（財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)） ????譯者：Charlie ????審稿：李翔 |
????The Nasdaq closed above 5,000 today, marking its first visit to that hallowed threshold since the halcyon days of 2000. So where are all the tech IPOs? ????So far this year, only one tech company has gone public. That would be cloud storage company Box Inc., which raised $175 million near the end of January. After that, bupkis. ????To be sure, there have been IPOs. Not nearly as many as we saw during the first two months of 2014 — 29 vs. 41 — but still a bunch of offerings from companies in such sectors as biotech and real estate. Tech, however, has been conspicuously absent. ????There is no definitive reason for the vacancy, but the most likely culprits are late-stage investors. Not just the traditional players like Institutional Venture Partners and Insight Venture Partners, but all of the hedge fund and mutual fund tourists that are increasingly mining the private markets for a bit of extra yield (or perhaps they’re bored — flip a coin). With plenty of private capital available, why go public? Isn’t it better to be known as a “$20 billion company” when there aren’t any pesky stock trades that could turn you into a “$15 billion company” (or less) in an afternoon? ????The irony is that this new flood of capital is being made possible by JOBS Act legislation that was, in part, designed to encourage more startups to go public. ????In the short-term, this doesn’t matter to anyone but the bankers and stock exchanges that are being momentarily deprived of new fees. In the long-term, however, it means that retail investors won’t get to participate in the massive growth that new tech issuers used to experience in the months and years after listing. ????So if you happen to see a tech IPO anytime soon, be sure to pay attention. It might be a while before another one comes around. |
最新文章