????上周,，中國(guó)國(guó)務(wù)院總理李克強(qiáng)在3000名人大代表面前做政府工作報(bào)告時(shí)表示,，2014年中國(guó)的GDP增長(zhǎng)目標(biāo)是7.5%,，與兩年前持平。他的話帶動(dòng)了股市上漲,，市場(chǎng)參與者也不出所料地感到歡欣鼓舞,。不過(guò)，也有少數(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家對(duì)此表示異議,。他們認(rèn)為中國(guó)的年度GDP增長(zhǎng)目標(biāo)妨礙了政府關(guān)注一些重大問(wèn)題,，比如污染、債務(wù)激增和當(dāng)前的改革,，這種情況很危險(xiǎn),。持這種觀點(diǎn)的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家數(shù)量正在不斷上升，他們表示,，GDP增長(zhǎng)目標(biāo)弊大于利,。

????首先讓我們介紹一些背景情況：1985年中國(guó)首次核算GDP【此前中國(guó)借用蘇聯(lián)的物質(zhì)產(chǎn)品平衡表體系（Material Product System）來(lái)計(jì)算經(jīng)濟(jì)產(chǎn)出。這個(gè)體系的缺陷在于它不包括服務(wù)業(yè),。中國(guó)是一個(gè)幅員遼闊的國(guó)家,，這種經(jīng)濟(jì)核算方式?jīng)]什么價(jià)值】，隨后很快開(kāi)始公布GDP增長(zhǎng)目標(biāo),，20多年來(lái)一直如此,。

????最初，設(shè)定經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)目標(biāo)的效果很好,。地方政府努力完成經(jīng)濟(jì)指標(biāo),，幾千萬(wàn)人在這個(gè)過(guò)程中擺脫了貧困。然而,，隨著2010年之后中國(guó)很快躋身全球經(jīng)濟(jì)前五名,，接著又成為世界上第二大經(jīng)濟(jì)體（僅次于美國(guó)），GDP增長(zhǎng)目標(biāo)開(kāi)始顯現(xiàn)出它不利的一面,。地方政府不計(jì)代價(jià)地尋求經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng),。中國(guó)政府一直在食品安全問(wèn)題上妥協(xié)讓步。各地普遍出現(xiàn)環(huán)境污染,。為了促進(jìn)地方經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng),，所有規(guī)模較小的城市都存在影子債務(wù)。

????長(zhǎng)江商學(xué)院（the Cheung Kong Graduate School of Business）北京校區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)教授李偉說(shuō)：“一個(gè)國(guó)家還很貧窮時(shí),，制定GDP增長(zhǎng)目標(biāo)有好處。不過(guò),，一旦像中國(guó)這樣成為中等收入國(guó)家,，人們就會(huì)開(kāi)始重視生活質(zhì)量?！?/p>

????李偉指出,，中國(guó)目前處境艱難,。相比而言，改善服務(wù)能給美國(guó)地方政府帶來(lái)收益,，原因是更好的服務(wù)會(huì)吸引來(lái)更多的人,，稅收就會(huì)增長(zhǎng)。在中國(guó),，地方政府不能收稅,，而要靠中央政府的財(cái)政劃撥。通過(guò)防治大氣污染等措施吸引來(lái)更多的人也不能給中國(guó)各地的地方政府帶來(lái)好處,，他們唯一想吸引的是那些能促進(jìn)地方經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的人,，目的是給中央政府一個(gè)好印象，從而提高自己在財(cái)政收入分配中所占的份額,。地方政府要的是能提升GDP的行業(yè),，有時(shí)這些行業(yè)會(huì)造成污染，或者需要很大的激勵(lì),，而這會(huì)影響民眾的生活質(zhì)量,。

????制定GDP增長(zhǎng)目標(biāo)的部分原因是證明中央政府的決策合理性。經(jīng)濟(jì)咨詢機(jī)構(gòu)龍洲經(jīng)訊（Gavekal Dragonomics）研究總監(jiān)白安儒這樣寫(xiě)道：“中國(guó)政府錯(cuò)過(guò)了降低,、甚至完全放棄經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)目標(biāo)的機(jī)會(huì),，表明中國(guó)政府在讓公眾繼續(xù)支持自己的政策規(guī)劃方面存在顧慮?！比ツ?，中國(guó)政府在信貸飛速增長(zhǎng)的情況下收緊了政策，今年的增長(zhǎng)目標(biāo)則表明,，中國(guó)再次采取了促增長(zhǎng)政策,。白安儒說(shuō)：“有些人和我們一樣，希望看到中國(guó)政府能迅速改變執(zhí)著于增長(zhǎng)目標(biāo)的局面,。因此,，我們這些人都很失望?！?/p>

????中國(guó)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人似乎已經(jīng)意識(shí)到,，雖然公布GDP增長(zhǎng)目標(biāo)存在問(wèn)題，但他們無(wú)力予以解決,。李克強(qiáng)總理在人大會(huì)議上宣布最新經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)目標(biāo)一天后,，財(cái)政部長(zhǎng)樓繼偉在記者招待會(huì)上表示，經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)稍低于目標(biāo)也無(wú)妨,。樓繼偉說(shuō),，7.2%也算合理的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)率。他強(qiáng)調(diào)，創(chuàng)造就業(yè)機(jī)會(huì),、控制物價(jià)上漲和經(jīng)濟(jì)效益比實(shí)現(xiàn)增長(zhǎng)目標(biāo)更重要,。

????公布今年的GDP目標(biāo)后立即給它打個(gè)折扣，看起來(lái)幾乎就像是預(yù)先安排好的一樣,。就好比中國(guó)政府先公布一個(gè)備受矚目的數(shù)字,，然后又解釋說(shuō)，實(shí)現(xiàn)這個(gè)目標(biāo)也不是什么大事,。

????中國(guó)會(huì)不會(huì)很快就停止制定GDP目標(biāo),？經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家對(duì)這個(gè)問(wèn)題的態(tài)度并不樂(lè)觀。但就目前而言,，中國(guó)肯在這個(gè)目標(biāo)上讓步可能已經(jīng)是個(gè)足夠好的消息了,。（財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)）

????譯者：Charlie

????When China's Premier Li Keqiang told a supportive audience of 3,000 delegates in Beijing last week that the country would aim for 7.5% GDP growth in 2014 -- the same target of the past two years -- stocks rose and traders predictably cheered. But the news also produced groans from a small but growing number of economists who believe China's annual GDP target dangerously distracts the country from its huge problems of pollution, exploding debt, and ongoing reforms. They say it hurts more than it helps.

????First, some background: China has released GDP targets for more than two decades, beginning shortly after the country first calculated GDP in 1985. (Before that, China relied on the Material Product System to measure economic output, a system borrowed from the Soviets. MPS's flaw is that it doesn't measure services, which in a country as large as China makes it kind of worthless.)

????GDP targeting worked well for China initially. Local governments strived to meet economic directives and freed tens of millions from poverty in the process. But as China cracked into the world's top five economies earlier this decade and then moved into the No. 2 spot (behind the U.S.), GDP targets began showing their dark side. Local governments were pursuing growth at any cost. In China, food safety has been compromised. Pollution is widespread. Shadow debt exists across smaller cities as localities push for growth.

????"When you are poor country, GDP targeting has advantages," says Wei Li, professor of economics at the Cheung Kong Graduate School of Business in Beijing. "But once you're in middle income, like China, people start to value quality of life."

????Li points out that China is in a tough spot. In the U.S., for comparison, local governments are rewarded for providing better services because better services attract more people, and tax revenues increase. In China, because local government's can't collect taxes -- they instead rely on allocations from the central government -- they aren't rewarded for attracting more people with offerings such as, say, clean air. The only people they seek to attract are those who will boost local GDP, thus impressing the central government into allocating them a larger share of revenues. Localities seek out GDP-boosting businesses, sometimes polluting ones or those that require big incentives, at a detriment to citizens' quality of life.

????GDP targets are used in part to legitimize the central government. "Passing up the opportunity to lower or abandon the growth target shows the government's concern with maintaining public support for its agenda," writes Andrew Batson, China Research Director at Gavekal Dragonomics. The target signals a return to the country's pro-growth policies after it tightened runaway credit last year. "This is disappointing to those like ourselves who would like to see China move more quickly away from its obsession with growth targets," Batson says.

????China's leaders seem to recognize that while publishing GDP targets is problematic, it's something they are helpless to fix. A day after Li Keqiang released the latest figure at China's largest annual government meeting, Finance Minister Lou Jiwei told a press briefing that it would be okay if China slightly missed the mark. He said 7.2% could be acceptable, stressing the importance of job creation, inflation control, and economic gains over hitting the target.

????The instant backing away from this year's GDP target seemed almost premeditated, like the government wanted to release an impressive figure before explaining why it wasn't really that big of a deal if they met it.

????Economists aren't optimistic that China will stop publishing targets anytime soon. But China's backpedaling might be good enough news for now.?????