谷歌又被歐盟“針對”了,。從歐盟監(jiān)管機構(gòu)的態(tài)度看,它無疑是將數(shù)據(jù)問題當(dāng)作一個嚴肅的反壟斷問題看待,。
本周二,,歐盟委員會對谷歌以20億美元收購可穿戴技術(shù)公司Fitbit的計劃展開了深入調(diào)查。在此之前,,歐盟,、美國和巴西的消費者權(quán)益和隱私保護人士都曾對這筆交易可能造成的影響提出過警告。
歐盟為什么如此針對谷歌,?首先,,谷歌是歐洲在線廣告市場的領(lǐng)頭羊,而且它在歐洲搜索市場上也占據(jù)了高達94%的份額,。谷歌一旦通過這筆收購獲得了Fitbit所擁有的健康數(shù)據(jù),,很可能將進一步鞏固其壟斷地位。
在過去的一年之中,,歐盟的競爭事務(wù)專員,、數(shù)字化專家瑪格麗特?韋斯塔格爾曾多次警告人們數(shù)據(jù)濫用的潛在惡果:
“未來幾年,歐洲消費者對可穿戴設(shè)備的使用將出現(xiàn)顯著增長,。與此同時,,這些可穿戴設(shè)備生成的數(shù)據(jù)也將呈指數(shù)級增長。這些數(shù)據(jù)對用戶的生活和健康狀況意義重大,。我們進行此次調(diào)查的目的,,就是要確保此次收購一旦完成,谷歌通過相關(guān)可穿戴設(shè)備收集的數(shù)據(jù)不會造成影響公平競爭的后果,?!?/p>
據(jù)報道,大約一個月前,,韋斯塔格爾的部門聯(lián)系上了谷歌和Fitbit的幾個競爭對手,,詢問他們對此次收購的看法,。這種做法也引起了外界的廣泛關(guān)注,大家都認為對這筆收購有進一步調(diào)查的必要,。
谷歌在本周二的一篇博文中表示,,此次收購的目的“是為了設(shè)備,而不是為了數(shù)據(jù),?!?/p>
谷歌的設(shè)備與服務(wù)總監(jiān)里克?奧斯特洛表示:“我們從一開始就明確表示,我們不會將Fitbit的健康和衛(wèi)生數(shù)據(jù)用于谷歌廣告,。最近,,我們還就Fitbit數(shù)據(jù)的使用問題,向歐盟委員會做出了具有法律約束力的承諾,?!?/p>
歐盟委員會本周二指出,谷歌已經(jīng)承諾,,它將把“通過可穿戴設(shè)備收集的特定數(shù)據(jù)”與其他數(shù)據(jù)區(qū)分開來,,使相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)無法用于向Fitbit和谷歌的用戶做定向廣告。
不過谷歌還是留了一句活話,。谷歌之所以要強調(diào)“特定數(shù)據(jù)”,,就是說并非谷歌從Fitbit處獲得的所有數(shù)據(jù)都不會用于定向廣告。
有意思的是,,韋斯塔格爾的反壟斷小組不僅將調(diào)查此次收購對歐洲搜索市場,、在線廣告市場乃至廣告技術(shù)市場的影響,他們甚至還打算調(diào)查這兩家公司的數(shù)據(jù)庫合并后,,將對歐洲新興的數(shù)字健康行業(yè)產(chǎn)生什么影響,。
這個反壟斷小組還將評估“一旦谷歌收購了Fitbit,谷歌是否將有能力和動機,,去降低競爭對手的可穿戴設(shè)備與谷歌Android操作系統(tǒng)的交互水平,。”
迄今為止,,針對谷歌在廣告,、搜索和智能手機市場的一些“可疑行為”,韋斯塔格爾領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的歐盟反壟斷機構(gòu)已經(jīng)對谷歌處以三筆巨額罰款,,總額超過90億美元,。
不過這次調(diào)查跟前幾次有所不同,這次調(diào)查不是“翻舊賬”,,而是為了“預(yù)防”谷歌在將來有什么不法行為,。此次調(diào)查的時間也不會太長,不會像以前那樣動輒持續(xù)數(shù)年,。歐盟委員會必須在12月9日前決定是否批準這次收購,,以及附加什么條件,。
歐洲消費者組織(BEUC)對歐盟啟動這次調(diào)查表示了贊賞。
該組織理事長莫尼克·戈恩斯在一份聲明中表示:“我們很擔(dān)心谷歌收購Fitbit會嚴重損害消費者的利益,?!?/p>
“這次收購很可能將成為一件改變業(yè)界游戲規(guī)則的大事。它不僅關(guān)乎消費者與網(wǎng)絡(luò)世界的交互方式,,還關(guān)系到用戶健康數(shù)據(jù)的使用,。歐盟進行的這次深入調(diào)查非常必要, 因為在將來,,F(xiàn)itbit等可穿戴設(shè)備可能會把消費者一天24小時的所有情況事無巨細地反饋給那些科技公司,而科技公司則會基于這些數(shù)據(jù)打造數(shù)字服務(wù),,然后再提供給消費者,。”(財富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:Feb
谷歌又被歐盟“針對”了,。從歐盟監(jiān)管機構(gòu)的態(tài)度看,,它無疑是將數(shù)據(jù)問題當(dāng)作一個嚴肅的反壟斷問題看待。
本周二,,歐盟委員會對谷歌以20億美元收購可穿戴技術(shù)公司Fitbit的計劃展開了深入調(diào)查,。在此之前,歐盟,、美國和巴西的消費者權(quán)益和隱私保護人士都曾對這筆交易可能造成的影響提出過警告,。
歐盟為什么如此針對谷歌?首先,,谷歌是歐洲在線廣告市場的領(lǐng)頭羊,,而且它在歐洲搜索市場上也占據(jù)了高達94%的份額。谷歌一旦通過這筆收購獲得了Fitbit所擁有的健康數(shù)據(jù),,很可能將進一步鞏固其壟斷地位,。
在過去的一年之中,歐盟的競爭事務(wù)專員,、數(shù)字化專家瑪格麗特?韋斯塔格爾曾多次警告人們數(shù)據(jù)濫用的潛在惡果:
“未來幾年,,歐洲消費者對可穿戴設(shè)備的使用將出現(xiàn)顯著增長。與此同時,,這些可穿戴設(shè)備生成的數(shù)據(jù)也將呈指數(shù)級增長,。這些數(shù)據(jù)對用戶的生活和健康狀況意義重大。我們進行此次調(diào)查的目的,,就是要確保此次收購一旦完成,,谷歌通過相關(guān)可穿戴設(shè)備收集的數(shù)據(jù)不會造成影響公平競爭的后果?!?/p>
據(jù)報道,,大約一個月前,,韋斯塔格爾的部門聯(lián)系上了谷歌和Fitbit的幾個競爭對手,詢問他們對此次收購的看法,。這種做法也引起了外界的廣泛關(guān)注,,大家都認為對這筆收購有進一步調(diào)查的必要。
谷歌在本周二的一篇博文中表示,,此次收購的目的“是為了設(shè)備,,而不是為了數(shù)據(jù)?!?/p>
谷歌的設(shè)備與服務(wù)總監(jiān)里克?奧斯特洛表示:“我們從一開始就明確表示,,我們不會將Fitbit的健康和衛(wèi)生數(shù)據(jù)用于谷歌廣告。最近,,我們還就Fitbit數(shù)據(jù)的使用問題,,向歐盟委員會做出了具有法律約束力的承諾?!?/p>
歐盟委員會本周二指出,,谷歌已經(jīng)承諾,它將把“通過可穿戴設(shè)備收集的特定數(shù)據(jù)”與其他數(shù)據(jù)區(qū)分開來,,使相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)無法用于向Fitbit和谷歌的用戶做定向廣告,。
不過谷歌還是留了一句活話。谷歌之所以要強調(diào)“特定數(shù)據(jù)”,,就是說并非谷歌從Fitbit處獲得的所有數(shù)據(jù)都不會用于定向廣告,。
有意思的是,韋斯塔格爾的反壟斷小組不僅將調(diào)查此次收購對歐洲搜索市場,、在線廣告市場乃至廣告技術(shù)市場的影響,,他們甚至還打算調(diào)查這兩家公司的數(shù)據(jù)庫合并后,將對歐洲新興的數(shù)字健康行業(yè)產(chǎn)生什么影響,。
這個反壟斷小組還將評估“一旦谷歌收購了Fitbit,,谷歌是否將有能力和動機,去降低競爭對手的可穿戴設(shè)備與谷歌Android操作系統(tǒng)的交互水平,?!?/p>
迄今為止,針對谷歌在廣告,、搜索和智能手機市場的一些“可疑行為”,,韋斯塔格爾領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的歐盟反壟斷機構(gòu)已經(jīng)對谷歌處以三筆巨額罰款,總額超過90億美元,。
不過這次調(diào)查跟前幾次有所不同,,這次調(diào)查不是“翻舊賬”,而是為了“預(yù)防”谷歌在將來有什么不法行為,。此次調(diào)查的時間也不會太長,,不會像以前那樣動輒持續(xù)數(shù)年,。歐盟委員會必須在12月9日前決定是否批準這次收購,以及附加什么條件,。
歐洲消費者組織(BEUC)對歐盟啟動這次調(diào)查表示了贊賞,。
該組織理事長莫尼克·戈恩斯在一份聲明中表示:“我們很擔(dān)心谷歌收購Fitbit會嚴重損害消費者的利益?!?/p>
“這次收購很可能將成為一件改變業(yè)界游戲規(guī)則的大事,。它不僅關(guān)乎消費者與網(wǎng)絡(luò)世界的交互方式,還關(guān)系到用戶健康數(shù)據(jù)的使用,。歐盟進行的這次深入調(diào)查非常必要,, 因為在將來,F(xiàn)itbit等可穿戴設(shè)備可能會把消費者一天24小時的所有情況事無巨細地反饋給那些科技公司,,而科技公司則會基于這些數(shù)據(jù)打造數(shù)字服務(wù),,然后再提供給消費者?!保ㄘ敻恢形木W(wǎng))
譯者:Feb
There's now no doubt about it: Europe's regulators see data as a serious potential antitrust issue.
On Tuesday, the European Commission opened an in-depth investigation into Google's proposed $2 billion takeover of Fitbit, the wearable-tech firm. The move follows warnings by consumer-rights and privacy advocates in the EU, the U.S. and Brazil, over the possible implications of the deal.
The gist of the probe is that Google—already the leader in online advertising in Europe, where it also has a 94% share of the search market—could further fortify that position by getting access to the health data that Fitbit holds.
Here's Margrethe Vestager, the EU competition commissioner and digital champion, who has spent the last year warning about the effects of data's misuse:
"The use of wearable devices by European consumers is expected to grow significantly in the coming years. This will go hand in hand with an exponential growth of data generated through these devices. This data provides key insights about the life and the health situation of the users of these devices. Our investigation aims to ensure that control by Google over data collected through wearable devices as a result of the transaction does not distort competition."
Around a month ago, Vestager's department was reported to be asking Google and Fitbit's rivals about their views on the takeover. That exercise seems to have yielded enough concerns to merit a deeper investigation.
Google said in a Tuesday blog post that the deal was "about devices, not data."
"We’ve been clear from the beginning that we will not use Fitbit health and wellness data for Google ads," wrote Google devices and services chief Rick Osterloh. "We recently offered to make a legally binding commitment to the European Commission regarding our use of Fitbit data."
The Commission noted Tuesday that Google had addressed its initial concerns by promising it would keep "certain data collected through wearable devices" separate from its other datasets, so it can't be used to tailor ads for Fitbit and Google users.
But no dice. The Commission said Google's proposal did not cover all the data it would get through the Fitbit buy.
Interestingly, Vestager's antitrust squad won't just be looking into the takeover's potential effects on the European search and display advertising markets, and the advertising technology market—they will also delve into the questions of how the combination of the two companies' databased might affect the nascent digital healthcare sector.
The team will even examine whether Google would have the "ability and incentive to degrade the interoperability of rivals' wearables with Google's Android operating system for smartphones once it owns Fitbit."
Vestager has thus far whacked Google with three enormous fines, totaling over $9 billion, over its questionable behavior in the advertising, search and smartphone markets.
However, this is a different sort of probe. It's not about past behavior, but rather about stopping Google from behaving badly in future. It should also take much less time—instead of years, the Commission has until December 9 to make up its mind about whether the takeover can go ahead, and with what strings attached.
The European Consumer Organisation (BEUC) praised the opening of the investigation.
"We have serious concerns that Google’s takeover of Fitbit could significantly harm consumers," said BEUC director general Monique Goyens in a statement.
"This takeover is likely to be a worrying game-changer not only for how consumers interact with the online world but also for how their health data is used. It is hugely important that the EU carries-out this in-depth examination because wearable devices like Fitbit’s could in future give companies details of essentially everything consumers do 24/7 and feed digital services back to consumers."