亚色在线观看_亚洲人成a片高清在线观看不卡_亚洲中文无码亚洲人成频_免费在线黄片,69精品视频九九精品视频,美女大黄三级,人人干人人g,全新av网站每日更新播放,亚洲三及片,wwww无码视频,亚洲中文字幕无码一区在线

首頁(yè) 500強(qiáng) 活動(dòng) 榜單 商業(yè) 科技 商潮 專(zhuān)題 品牌中心
雜志訂閱

庫(kù)克曾支持遠(yuǎn)程辦公,但現(xiàn)在蘋(píng)果卻改變了態(tài)度

JANE THIER
2023-03-30

這場(chǎng)實(shí)驗(yàn)正在失去動(dòng)力,。

文本設(shè)置
小號(hào)
默認(rèn)
大號(hào)
Plus(0條)

據(jù)媒體報(bào)道,蘋(píng)果威脅將對(duì)每周現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公未滿(mǎn)3天的員工進(jìn)行處罰,。圖片來(lái)源:JUSTIN SULLIVAN—GETTY IMAGES

2022年6月,,蘋(píng)果(Apple)CEO蒂姆·庫(kù)克對(duì)于遠(yuǎn)程辦公似乎處之泰然,。他在紐約舉辦的“時(shí)代100人”(TIME 100)研討會(huì)上表示:“我們正在進(jìn)行的遠(yuǎn)程辦公是所有實(shí)驗(yàn)之母?!彼梦⑷醯穆曇粽f(shuō)道:“因?yàn)槲覀冞€不知道它的結(jié)果,。”兩個(gè)月后,,他命令員工每周三天現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公?,F(xiàn)在,有報(bào)道稱(chēng)他威脅要對(duì)拒不配合的員工進(jìn)行處罰,。換言之,,這場(chǎng)實(shí)驗(yàn)正在失去動(dòng)力。

科技資訊平臺(tái)Platformer的主編佐伊·希弗周三發(fā)推文稱(chēng),,蘋(píng)果威脅對(duì)每周五個(gè)工作日現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公室時(shí)間不足三個(gè)工作日的員工進(jìn)行處罰,。她還表示,蘋(píng)果根據(jù)員工刷身份識(shí)別卡的情況跟蹤員工現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公天數(shù),,有些管理者可能?chē)?yán)厲警告員工,,不遵守規(guī)定最終可能被公司辭退。

希弗表示:“在蘋(píng)果公司,,有些部門(mén)表示不遵守公司規(guī)定可能導(dǎo)致被辭退,,但這似乎并非全公司的政策?!?/p>

蘋(píng)果公司的代表未答復(fù)《財(cái)富》雜志的置評(píng)請(qǐng)求,。

自首次封鎖以來(lái),有許多公司試圖確定一個(gè)恢復(fù)現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公的具體日期,,蘋(píng)果也是其中之一,。2021年,隨著新變種病毒不斷出現(xiàn),,更多員工推遲現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公,,公司的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者不斷推遲恢復(fù)現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公的日期。

蘋(píng)果首先在2022年3月,,要求員工每周僅現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公一天,。CEO蒂姆·庫(kù)克當(dāng)時(shí)在一份備忘錄中表示:“我知道對(duì)于許多同事來(lái)說(shuō),重回辦公室是一個(gè)被期待已久的里程碑,,也是一個(gè)積極信號(hào),,證明我們能夠與同事進(jìn)行更全面的溝通。他們?cè)谖覀兊纳钪邪缪葜匾慕巧?。也有人可能認(rèn)為這是一種令人不安的變化,。”事實(shí)上,,這條規(guī)定確實(shí)導(dǎo)致員工的不滿(mǎn)意度大幅提高,。

庫(kù)克并非唯一一位不贊同完全遠(yuǎn)程辦公的《財(cái)富》世界500強(qiáng)CEO,。本月早些時(shí)候,Meta CEO馬克·扎克伯格表示,,全體員工每周至少現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公三天,,在同事之間“更容易建立信任”。推特CEO埃隆·馬斯克在凌晨2:30群發(fā)了一封郵件,,提醒員工現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公是強(qiáng)制要求,。

2022年,蘋(píng)果逐步增加要求員工現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公的天數(shù),。到8月,,增加到每周三天,分別是周二,、周四和團(tuán)隊(duì)負(fù)責(zé)人選擇的第三個(gè)工作日,。但員工卻并不喜歡這種安排。

去年夏天,,蘋(píng)果一個(gè)名為“蘋(píng)果團(tuán)結(jié)”的組織發(fā)起請(qǐng)?jiān)笗?shū),,有超過(guò)1,200名員工簽署,他們反對(duì)現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公規(guī)定,,并表示他們?cè)谝咔槠陂g居家辦公“表現(xiàn)出色”,。

該組織的成員寫(xiě)道:“我們認(rèn)為為了打造一個(gè)更多元化、更成功的公司,,蘋(píng)果應(yīng)該鼓勵(lì)而不是禁止靈活辦公,讓我們?cè)诠究梢园残牡亍辛眍?lèi)思考’,?!?/p>

事實(shí)上,蘋(píng)果員工可以以遠(yuǎn)程辦公時(shí)期出色的財(cái)務(wù)業(yè)績(jī)來(lái)支持他們的主張,。2020年8月,,隨著數(shù)以百萬(wàn)計(jì)消費(fèi)者選購(gòu)蘋(píng)果的產(chǎn)品,蘋(píng)果市值超過(guò)2萬(wàn)億美元,。2022年1月,,在現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公命令被推遲期間,蘋(píng)果市值一度達(dá)到驚人的3萬(wàn)億美元,,在短短不到四年時(shí)間里增長(zhǎng)了三倍,,成為美國(guó)第一家市值超過(guò)3萬(wàn)億美元大關(guān)的公司。

庫(kù)克仍固執(zhí)己見(jiàn),。他在11月接受美國(guó)哥倫比亞廣播公司(CBS)采訪時(shí),,為公司的混合辦公政策辯護(hù)。

他說(shuō)道:“我們生產(chǎn)產(chǎn)品,,你必須現(xiàn)場(chǎng)觸碰產(chǎn)品,。必須相互合作,,因?yàn)槲覀兿嘈乓患右淮笥诙R虼?,這需要我們能幸運(yùn)地碰到其他人,,進(jìn)行思想交流,并且足夠關(guān)心他人,,這樣你才能通過(guò)其他人完善自己的想法,,因?yàn)槟阒肋@將令你的想法變成一個(gè)更偉大的創(chuàng)意?!?/p>

他補(bǔ)充道,,這并不意味著需要現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公五天?!叭绻阒芪宓睫k公室,,你會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)它就像是一座鬼城?!彼f(shuō)得沒(méi)錯(cuò),;物業(yè)管理公司Kastle Systems的數(shù)據(jù)顯示,截至去年夏天,,美國(guó)只有30%的上班族現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公,。

跟蹤員工現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公時(shí)間的問(wèn)題

庫(kù)克和有同樣心態(tài)的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者所說(shuō)的現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公的好處,可能確實(shí)有一定的道理,。軟件公司思杰(Citrix)的研究發(fā)現(xiàn),,與遠(yuǎn)程或完全現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公的工作者相比,混合辦公的知識(shí)工作者與同事的聯(lián)系方式,,更有可能提高工作效率,、滿(mǎn)意度和與上司的聯(lián)系。庫(kù)克的同行,、賽富時(shí)(Salesforce)CEO馬克·貝尼奧夫曾在2022年6月批評(píng)重回辦公室辦公的命令,,但幾個(gè)月后,他表示現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公的員工效率更高,。

但疫情持續(xù)三年之后,,絕大多數(shù)工作者似乎依舊不愿意根據(jù)老板的命令重回現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公。Slack的未來(lái)論壇(Future Forum)研究顯示,,95%的工作者希望可以完全自由地選擇工作時(shí)間和工作地點(diǎn),。

斯坦福大學(xué)(Stanford)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)教授尼克·布魯姆是遠(yuǎn)程辦公研究這個(gè)新興領(lǐng)域的權(quán)威專(zhuān)家。他在10月對(duì)《財(cái)富》雜志表示,,事實(shí)可能證明,,強(qiáng)力推行現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公的公司缺乏遠(yuǎn)見(jiàn)。布魯姆去年對(duì)《財(cái)富》雜志表示:“女性,、殘疾人士和有色人種都偏好遠(yuǎn)程辦公,,[公司]的做法不僅會(huì)令員工不滿(mǎn),,如果他們繼續(xù)這樣做還將面臨多樣化問(wèn)題。我認(rèn)為,,這是他們沒(méi)有意識(shí)到的另外一種成本,。”

布魯姆表示,,監(jiān)控員工現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公時(shí)間的公司并沒(méi)有真正考慮過(guò)他們真正的最終目標(biāo),。如果員工每周僅現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公兩天,而不是公司規(guī)定的三天,,人力資源部根據(jù)員工的刷卡情況發(fā)現(xiàn)后并上報(bào)給該員工的上司,,接下來(lái)會(huì)發(fā)生什么?“上司接下來(lái)會(huì)怎么做,?”

布魯姆表示,,他們有兩個(gè)選擇:一種選擇是視而不見(jiàn),這可能在明確告訴員工,,現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公的規(guī)則沒(méi)有威懾力,。最終會(huì)顯得公司管理軟弱無(wú)力。另外一種選擇是處罰下屬,,并告知下屬:“我知道你表現(xiàn)良好,,并且實(shí)現(xiàn)了目標(biāo),但出勤率不佳,,因此我們將對(duì)你降薪,。”

布魯姆表示:“顯然,,這只會(huì)將高績(jī)效員工趕到競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手的陣營(yíng),。這兩個(gè)選擇都沒(méi)有吸引力,因此無(wú)論怎么做都不算是好政策,。”

他表示,,尤其是在蘋(píng)果這樣的公司,,將現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公時(shí)間作為指標(biāo)是愚蠢的策略,因?yàn)楣菊衅傅亩际亲顑?yōu)秀的人才,。布魯姆表示:“蘋(píng)果公司的每一名員工都雄心勃勃,;他們都是出類(lèi)拔萃的人才,不會(huì)偷懶,。他們會(huì)竭盡所能完善自己的事業(yè)?,F(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公規(guī)定不受歡迎,應(yīng)該表明是否現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公并不重要,?!?/p>

布魯姆表示:“2023年,,凡是不采取混合辦公的任何公司,都會(huì)遭到恥笑,?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))

翻譯:劉進(jìn)龍

審校:汪皓

2022年6月,蘋(píng)果(Apple)CEO蒂姆·庫(kù)克對(duì)于遠(yuǎn)程辦公似乎處之泰然,。他在紐約舉辦的“時(shí)代100人”(TIME 100)研討會(huì)上表示:“我們正在進(jìn)行的遠(yuǎn)程辦公是所有實(shí)驗(yàn)之母,。”他用微弱的聲音說(shuō)道:“因?yàn)槲覀冞€不知道它的結(jié)果,?!眱蓚€(gè)月后,他命令員工每周三天現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公?,F(xiàn)在,,有報(bào)道稱(chēng)他威脅要對(duì)拒不配合的員工進(jìn)行處罰。換言之,,這場(chǎng)實(shí)驗(yàn)正在失去動(dòng)力,。

科技資訊平臺(tái)Platformer的主編佐伊·希弗周三發(fā)推文稱(chēng),蘋(píng)果威脅對(duì)每周五個(gè)工作日現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公室時(shí)間不足三個(gè)工作日的員工進(jìn)行處罰,。她還表示,,蘋(píng)果根據(jù)員工刷身份識(shí)別卡的情況跟蹤員工現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公天數(shù),有些管理者可能?chē)?yán)厲警告員工,,不遵守規(guī)定最終可能被公司辭退,。

希弗表示:“在蘋(píng)果公司,有些部門(mén)表示不遵守公司規(guī)定可能導(dǎo)致被辭退,,但這似乎并非全公司的政策,。”

蘋(píng)果公司的代表未答復(fù)《財(cái)富》雜志的置評(píng)請(qǐng)求,。

自首次封鎖以來(lái),,有許多公司試圖確定一個(gè)恢復(fù)現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公的具體日期,蘋(píng)果也是其中之一,。2021年,,隨著新變種病毒不斷出現(xiàn),更多員工推遲現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公,,公司的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者不斷推遲恢復(fù)現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公的日期,。

蘋(píng)果首先在2022年3月,要求員工每周僅現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公一天,。CEO蒂姆·庫(kù)克當(dāng)時(shí)在一份備忘錄中表示:“我知道對(duì)于許多同事來(lái)說(shuō),,重回辦公室是一個(gè)被期待已久的里程碑,也是一個(gè)積極信號(hào),證明我們能夠與同事進(jìn)行更全面的溝通,。他們?cè)谖覀兊纳钪邪缪葜匾慕巧?。也有人可能認(rèn)為這是一種令人不安的變化?!笔聦?shí)上,,這條規(guī)定確實(shí)導(dǎo)致員工的不滿(mǎn)意度大幅提高。

庫(kù)克并非唯一一位不贊同完全遠(yuǎn)程辦公的《財(cái)富》世界500強(qiáng)CEO,。本月早些時(shí)候,,Meta CEO馬克·扎克伯格表示,全體員工每周至少現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公三天,,在同事之間“更容易建立信任”,。推特CEO埃隆·馬斯克在凌晨2:30群發(fā)了一封郵件,提醒員工現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公是強(qiáng)制要求,。

2022年,,蘋(píng)果逐步增加要求員工現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公的天數(shù)。到8月,,增加到每周三天,,分別是周二、周四和團(tuán)隊(duì)負(fù)責(zé)人選擇的第三個(gè)工作日,。但員工卻并不喜歡這種安排,。

去年夏天,蘋(píng)果一個(gè)名為“蘋(píng)果團(tuán)結(jié)”的組織發(fā)起請(qǐng)?jiān)笗?shū),,有超過(guò)1,200名員工簽署,,他們反對(duì)現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公規(guī)定,并表示他們?cè)谝咔槠陂g居家辦公“表現(xiàn)出色”,。

該組織的成員寫(xiě)道:“我們認(rèn)為為了打造一個(gè)更多元化,、更成功的公司,蘋(píng)果應(yīng)該鼓勵(lì)而不是禁止靈活辦公,,讓我們?cè)诠究梢园残牡亍辛眍?lèi)思考’,。”

事實(shí)上,,蘋(píng)果員工可以以遠(yuǎn)程辦公時(shí)期出色的財(cái)務(wù)業(yè)績(jī)來(lái)支持他們的主張,。2020年8月,隨著數(shù)以百萬(wàn)計(jì)消費(fèi)者選購(gòu)蘋(píng)果的產(chǎn)品,,蘋(píng)果市值超過(guò)2萬(wàn)億美元。2022年1月,,在現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公命令被推遲期間,,蘋(píng)果市值一度達(dá)到驚人的3萬(wàn)億美元,在短短不到四年時(shí)間里增長(zhǎng)了三倍,成為美國(guó)第一家市值超過(guò)3萬(wàn)億美元大關(guān)的公司,。

庫(kù)克仍固執(zhí)己見(jiàn),。他在11月接受美國(guó)哥倫比亞廣播公司(CBS)采訪時(shí),為公司的混合辦公政策辯護(hù),。

他說(shuō)道:“我們生產(chǎn)產(chǎn)品,,你必須現(xiàn)場(chǎng)觸碰產(chǎn)品。必須相互合作,,因?yàn)槲覀兿嘈乓患右淮笥诙?。因此,這需要我們能幸運(yùn)地碰到其他人,,進(jìn)行思想交流,,并且足夠關(guān)心他人,這樣你才能通過(guò)其他人完善自己的想法,,因?yàn)槟阒肋@將令你的想法變成一個(gè)更偉大的創(chuàng)意,。”

他補(bǔ)充道,,這并不意味著需要現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公五天,。“如果你周五到辦公室,,你會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)它就像是一座鬼城,。”他說(shuō)得沒(méi)錯(cuò),;物業(yè)管理公司Kastle Systems的數(shù)據(jù)顯示,,截至去年夏天,美國(guó)只有30%的上班族現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公,。

跟蹤員工現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公時(shí)間的問(wèn)題

庫(kù)克和有同樣心態(tài)的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者所說(shuō)的現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公的好處,,可能確實(shí)有一定的道理。軟件公司思杰(Citrix)的研究發(fā)現(xiàn),,與遠(yuǎn)程或完全現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公的工作者相比,,混合辦公的知識(shí)工作者與同事的聯(lián)系方式,更有可能提高工作效率,、滿(mǎn)意度和與上司的聯(lián)系,。庫(kù)克的同行、賽富時(shí)(Salesforce)CEO馬克·貝尼奧夫曾在2022年6月批評(píng)重回辦公室辦公的命令,,但幾個(gè)月后,,他表示現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公的員工效率更高。

但疫情持續(xù)三年之后,,絕大多數(shù)工作者似乎依舊不愿意根據(jù)老板的命令重回現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公,。Slack的未來(lái)論壇(Future Forum)研究顯示,,95%的工作者希望可以完全自由地選擇工作時(shí)間和工作地點(diǎn)。

斯坦福大學(xué)(Stanford)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)教授尼克·布魯姆是遠(yuǎn)程辦公研究這個(gè)新興領(lǐng)域的權(quán)威專(zhuān)家,。他在10月對(duì)《財(cái)富》雜志表示,,事實(shí)可能證明,強(qiáng)力推行現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公的公司缺乏遠(yuǎn)見(jiàn),。布魯姆去年對(duì)《財(cái)富》雜志表示:“女性,、殘疾人士和有色人種都偏好遠(yuǎn)程辦公,[公司]的做法不僅會(huì)令員工不滿(mǎn),,如果他們繼續(xù)這樣做還將面臨多樣化問(wèn)題,。我認(rèn)為,這是他們沒(méi)有意識(shí)到的另外一種成本,?!?/p>

布魯姆表示,監(jiān)控員工現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公時(shí)間的公司并沒(méi)有真正考慮過(guò)他們真正的最終目標(biāo),。如果員工每周僅現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公兩天,,而不是公司規(guī)定的三天,人力資源部根據(jù)員工的刷卡情況發(fā)現(xiàn)后并上報(bào)給該員工的上司,,接下來(lái)會(huì)發(fā)生什么,?“上司接下來(lái)會(huì)怎么做?”

布魯姆表示,,他們有兩個(gè)選擇:一種選擇是視而不見(jiàn),,這可能在明確告訴員工,現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公的規(guī)則沒(méi)有威懾力,。最終會(huì)顯得公司管理軟弱無(wú)力,。另外一種選擇是處罰下屬,并告知下屬:“我知道你表現(xiàn)良好,,并且實(shí)現(xiàn)了目標(biāo),,但出勤率不佳,因此我們將對(duì)你降薪,?!?/p>

布魯姆表示:“顯然,這只會(huì)將高績(jī)效員工趕到競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手的陣營(yíng),。這兩個(gè)選擇都沒(méi)有吸引力,,因此無(wú)論怎么做都不算是好政策?!?/p>

他表示,,尤其是在蘋(píng)果這樣的公司,將現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公時(shí)間作為指標(biāo)是愚蠢的策略,,因?yàn)楣菊衅傅亩际亲顑?yōu)秀的人才,。布魯姆表示:“蘋(píng)果公司的每一名員工都雄心勃勃,;他們都是出類(lèi)拔萃的人才,不會(huì)偷懶,。他們會(huì)竭盡所能完善自己的事業(yè)。現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公規(guī)定不受歡迎,,應(yīng)該表明是否現(xiàn)場(chǎng)辦公并不重要,。”

布魯姆表示:“2023年,,凡是不采取混合辦公的任何公司,,都會(huì)遭到恥笑?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))

翻譯:劉進(jìn)龍

審校:汪皓

In June 2022, Apple CEO Tim Cook sounded pretty philosophical about remote work. “We’re running the mother of all experiments,” he said at the TIME 100 symposium in New York, “because we don’t know,” he trailed off. Just a couple months later, though, he ordered staff back three days a week. And now he’s reportedly threatening to discipline the holdouts. In other words, the experiment may be losing steam.

Apple is threatening to level disciplinary action against workers who fail to come into the office for three-fifths of the working week, Zo? Schiffer, managing editor of tech newsletter Platformer, tweeted on Wednesday. She added that it is tracking employees via ID badge swipes, and some managers may give escalating warnings that could ultimately lead to termination.

“At Apple, some orgs are saying failure to comply could result in termination, but that doesn’t appear to be a company-wide policy,” Schiffer added.

A representative for Apple did not respond to Fortune’s request for comment.

Apple is one of the many companies that have attempted, at various points since the first lockdowns, to set a firm date on a return to office. Throughout 2021, as new variants emerged and more workers pushed back, leaders continued to push that date back.

The company first asked workers to come back in, for just one day a week, in March 2022. “For many of you, I know that returning to the office represents a long-awaited milestone and a positive sign that we can engage more fully with the colleagues who play such an important role in our lives,” CEO Tim Cook wrote in a memo at the time. “For others, it may also be an unsettling change.” And the mandate did, in fact, lead to an avalanche of discontent among workers.

Cook is far from the only Fortune 500 CEO to decry fully remote work. Earlier this month, Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg said it’s “easier to build trust” among workers when they’re all in the office at least three days a week. And Twitter’s Elon Musk just sent out a mass email—at 2:30 a.m.—reminding employees that the office is not optional.

Apple gradually added more days to the return-to-work mandate throughout 2022. By August, it had upped its requirement to three days per week: Tuesday, Thursday, and a third day each team leader chooses. Employees didn’t like that, either.

Over 1,200 Apple workers signed a petition last summer—dubbed “Apple Together”—pushing back against the in-person mandate and arguing that they have done “exceptional work” from home throughout the pandemic.

“We believe that Apple should encourage, not prohibit, flexible work to build a more diverse and successful company where we can feel comfortable to ‘think different’ together,” members of Apple Together wrote.

And in fact, Apple workers can point to some spectacular financial results in the remote era. Apple surpassed $2 trillion in market capitalization in August 2020, as millions of consumers ran for their products. In January 2022, right in the midst of a pushed back return to office mandate, it briefly reached a truly massive market capitalization of $3 trillion—this represented a tripling of its valuation in fewer than four years, becoming the first U.S. company to hit the milestone.

Cook remained undeterred. In an interview with CBS in November, Cook defended his company’s hybrid work push.

“We make product and you have to hold product,” he said. “You have to collaborate with one another because we believe that one plus one equals three. So that takes the serendipity of running into people and bouncing ideas off and caring enough to advance your idea through someone else because you know that’ll make it a bigger idea.”

That doesn’t mean five days of in-person work, he added. “If you were here on a Friday, it would be a ghost town.” He’s not wrong; as of last summer, just 30% of American workers were going to offices nationwide, per data from property manager Kastle Systems.

The issue with tracking

To be sure, Cook and like-minded leaders may have a point on the benefits of office work. Research from software company Citrix found that hybrid knowledge workers were more likely than remote or fully in-office workers to connect with their coworkers in a manner that led to increased productivity, satisfaction, and connection with their bosses. Cook’s peer Marc Benioff, the CEO of Salesforce, famously slammed return-to-office orders in June 2022 before concluding just months later than in-office workers were simply higher-performing.

But three years into the pandemic, the vast majority of workers still really seem to hate the idea of commuting back to the office on their bosses’ orders. Per Slack’s Future Forum research, 95% of workers want full freedom to choose when and where they work.

Stanford economics professor Nick Bloom, a leading expert in the emergent field of remote work research, told Fortune in October that companies who plow ahead could be showing a real lack of foresight. “Women, people with disabilities, and people of color all have a preference for remote work—not only are [companies] upsetting employees, they’ll face issues of diversity if they continue on this,” Bloom told Fortune last year. “That’s just another cost I don’t think they’re aware of.”

Bloom argued that companies who monitor their workforce haven’t really considered their actual end-goal. If a worker only comes in two days a week instead of the required three, which HR discovers by tracking swipes and informs the worker’s manager, what happens next? “Where does the manager go from there?”

They have two choices, Bloom said: They can ignore it, which would make it clear to employees that the rule has no teeth. That ultimately makes management look weak. Or: They could start to penalize people and say, “I know you perform well and hit your targets, but your attendance isn’t good, so we’re slashing your pay.”

“Obviously, that just pushes high performers out the door to your competitors,” Bloom said. “Neither of those choices are appealing, so either way you execute, I don’t see how it’s a good policy.”

It’s an especially silly metric to impose at a company like Apple, which only hires the best of the best in the first place, he said. “Everyone there is super ambitious; they’re stars of their class, not slackers,” Bloom added. “They’d generally do anything to improve their career. In-office mandates being unpopular should show that it’s not important.”

“In 2023,” Bloom said, “We’ll be laughing at anyone who does anything else but hybrid.”

財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)所刊載內(nèi)容之知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)為財(cái)富媒體知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)有限公司及/或相關(guān)權(quán)利人專(zhuān)屬所有或持有,。未經(jīng)許可,禁止進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)載,、摘編,、復(fù)制及建立鏡像等任何使用。
0條Plus
精彩評(píng)論
評(píng)論

撰寫(xiě)或查看更多評(píng)論

請(qǐng)打開(kāi)財(cái)富Plus APP

前往打開(kāi)
熱讀文章