
當(dāng)你覺得每天的時間都不夠用,要每周至少進行兩個半小時的中等至高強度運動就幾乎是不可能實現(xiàn)的,。
這個數(shù)字來自美國疾病控制與預(yù)防中心(CDC)針對所有成年人的建議,。該指南建議將150分鐘的鍛煉時間分散到每周五天、每天30分鐘,,此外還要對所有主要肌肉群進行兩天的力量訓(xùn)練,。
對于那些既要兼顧全職工作又要照顧孩子的父母,或是那些需要連續(xù)工作12個小時的輪班工作者來說,,每周鍛煉五天可能并不現(xiàn)實,。許多人在漫長的一天結(jié)束后幾乎沒有精力做飯。
這些人可能傾向于成為“周末戰(zhàn)士”——把鍛煉留到周末,。對于這些周末戰(zhàn)士來說,,有一個好消息:發(fā)表在《循環(huán)》雜志(Circulation)上的一項新研究表明,如果你仍能達(dá)到總體體育鍛煉指南的要求,,那么鍛煉一到兩天可能與一周每天鍛煉一樣有益,。
成為“周末戰(zhàn)士"的理由
這項研究的主要作者、麻省總醫(yī)院德莫拉斯心律失常中心(Demoulas Center for Cardiac Arrhythmias at Massachusetts General Hospital)的教員沙恩·胡爾希德(Shaan Khurshid)博士說:"如果需要投入大量時間或分散時間,,就很難讓人每周進行多次鍛煉,。”
胡爾希德告訴《財富》雜志,,據(jù)他觀察,,隨著忙碌的生活方式越來越普遍,越來越多的人把鍛煉集中在一兩天內(nèi)進行,。這促使他和他的團隊著手研究這個問題:那些每天鍛煉20-30分鐘的人是否比那些每周只在一到兩天進行較長時間鍛煉的人獲得更多的健康益處,?
似乎未必如此,。
周末戰(zhàn)士和規(guī)律運動的人患264種疾病的風(fēng)險幾乎同樣降低,尤其是高血壓,、糖尿病、肥胖癥和睡眠呼吸暫停癥,。
胡爾希德和他的同事們研究了89573名手腕上佩戴運動追蹤器(為期一周)的人的運動數(shù)據(jù),。30228名參與者被歸入不運動組(每周運動時間少于150分鐘),37872名參與者被歸入周末戰(zhàn)士組(每周運動至少150分鐘,,每周運動一到兩天),,21473名參與者被歸入規(guī)律運動組(每周至少運動150分鐘,分散在一周內(nèi)進行),。
所有的參與者都進行了中等至高強度運動——胡爾希德把將其定義為能使心率達(dá)到說話困難,、幾乎無法唱歌的程度的運動。他說,,這包括慢跑或進行體育運動等活動,。
在所有測試疾病類別中,與不運動組相比,,周末戰(zhàn)士和規(guī)律運動組都顯示出相似的降低健康風(fēng)險的效果,,包括:心臟病發(fā)作(風(fēng)險分別降低27%和35%)、中風(fēng)(風(fēng)險分別降低21%和17%)和糖尿?。L(fēng)險分別降低43%和46%),。
胡爾希德告訴《財富》雜志:"就預(yù)防疾病而言,我們沒有發(fā)現(xiàn)哪種(鍛煉)方式比另一種更好,?!?/p>
150分鐘的鍛煉時間仍然是魔法數(shù)字
如果你每周只鍛煉兩天,你可能需要把大部分的運動集中在那兩天內(nèi)完成,。周末戰(zhàn)士和規(guī)律運動的人得到的益處相似,,因為參與者在一周內(nèi)的運動總量相當(dāng)。
每周定期鍛煉的人的中度至高強度運動時間中位數(shù)為418分鐘,,而周末戰(zhàn)士的中位數(shù)為288分鐘,。最重要的是,他們的運動時間都遠(yuǎn)高于美國疾病控制與預(yù)防中心規(guī)定的每周150 分鐘的指導(dǎo)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),。
胡爾希德說,,底線是“找到最適合你的方法,以達(dá)到指南建議的水平”,。
他承認(rèn),,這項研究的局限性在于他們只對參與者進行了為期一周的跟蹤調(diào)查;不過,,胡爾希德說,,為期一周的跟蹤調(diào)查似乎仍能反映人們的常規(guī)活動習(xí)慣,。
增強鍛煉者的能力
胡爾希德說,那些努力每周鍛煉超過一兩天的人可以把這項研究看作是對他們選擇的日常生活和繁忙日程的認(rèn)可,。
“能夠說'達(dá)到你需要的運動量,,但如何運動并不重要,重要的是進行鍛煉,,這能賦予人們力量,。"胡爾希德說。
胡爾希德說:“我們沒必要對人們應(yīng)該如何進行鍛煉施加不必要的限制或是增加某個人的鍛煉難度,,比如說‘你必須每周鍛煉五天,,每次鍛煉30分鐘’。找到適合自己的習(xí)慣并堅持下去更能賦予你力量,?!?/p>
胡爾希德希望這些發(fā)現(xiàn)能推動他就這一主題開展更多研究,比如一年中需要多少周達(dá)到150分鐘的閾值才能對健康有益,。他說,,理想情況下,參與者將佩戴活動追蹤器數(shù)年,,以便有更多的長期數(shù)據(jù)可供分析,。(財富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:中慧言-王芳
當(dāng)你覺得每天的時間都不夠用,要每周至少進行兩個半小時的中等至高強度運動就幾乎是不可能實現(xiàn)的,。
這個數(shù)字來自美國疾病控制與預(yù)防中心(CDC)針對所有成年人的建議,。該指南建議將150分鐘的鍛煉時間分散到每周五天、每天30分鐘,,此外還要對所有主要肌肉群進行兩天的力量訓(xùn)練,。
對于那些既要兼顧全職工作又要照顧孩子的父母,或是那些需要連續(xù)工作12個小時的輪班工作者來說,,每周鍛煉五天可能并不現(xiàn)實,。許多人在漫長的一天結(jié)束后幾乎沒有精力做飯。
這些人可能傾向于成為“周末戰(zhàn)士”——把鍛煉留到周末,。對于這些周末戰(zhàn)士來說,,有一個好消息:發(fā)表在《循環(huán)》雜志(Circulation)上的一項新研究表明,如果你仍能達(dá)到總體體育鍛煉指南的要求,,那么鍛煉一到兩天可能與一周每天鍛煉一樣有益,。
成為“周末戰(zhàn)士"的理由
這項研究的主要作者、麻省總醫(yī)院德莫拉斯心律失常中心(Demoulas Center for Cardiac Arrhythmias at Massachusetts General Hospital)的教員沙恩·胡爾希德(Shaan Khurshid)博士說:"如果需要投入大量時間或分散時間,,就很難讓人每周進行多次鍛煉,。”
胡爾希德告訴《財富》雜志,據(jù)他觀察,,隨著忙碌的生活方式越來越普遍,,越來越多的人把鍛煉集中在一兩天內(nèi)進行。這促使他和他的團隊著手研究這個問題:那些每天鍛煉20-30分鐘的人是否比那些每周只在一到兩天進行較長時間鍛煉的人獲得更多的健康益處,?
似乎未必如此,。
周末戰(zhàn)士和規(guī)律運動的人患264種疾病的風(fēng)險幾乎同樣降低,尤其是高血壓,、糖尿病,、肥胖癥和睡眠呼吸暫停癥。
胡爾希德和他的同事們研究了89573名手腕上佩戴運動追蹤器(為期一周)的人的運動數(shù)據(jù),。30228名參與者被歸入不運動組(每周運動時間少于150分鐘),37872名參與者被歸入周末戰(zhàn)士組(每周運動至少150分鐘,,每周運動一到兩天),,21473名參與者被歸入規(guī)律運動組(每周至少運動150分鐘,分散在一周內(nèi)進行),。
所有的參與者都進行了中等至高強度運動——胡爾希德把將其定義為能使心率達(dá)到說話困難,、幾乎無法唱歌的程度的運動。他說,,這包括慢跑或進行體育運動等活動,。
在所有測試疾病類別中,與不運動組相比,,周末戰(zhàn)士和規(guī)律運動組都顯示出相似的降低健康風(fēng)險的效果,,包括:心臟病發(fā)作(風(fēng)險分別降低27%和35%)、中風(fēng)(風(fēng)險分別降低21%和17%)和糖尿?。L(fēng)險分別降低43%和46%),。
胡爾希德告訴《財富》雜志:"就預(yù)防疾病而言,我們沒有發(fā)現(xiàn)哪種(鍛煉)方式比另一種更好,?!?/p>
150分鐘的鍛煉時間仍然是魔法數(shù)字
如果你每周只鍛煉兩天,你可能需要把大部分的運動集中在那兩天內(nèi)完成,。周末戰(zhàn)士和規(guī)律運動的人得到的益處相似,,因為參與者在一周內(nèi)的運動總量相當(dāng)。
每周定期鍛煉的人的中度至高強度運動時間中位數(shù)為418分鐘,,而周末戰(zhàn)士的中位數(shù)為288分鐘,。最重要的是,他們的運動時間都遠(yuǎn)高于美國疾病控制與預(yù)防中心規(guī)定的每周150 分鐘的指導(dǎo)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),。
胡爾希德說,,底線是“找到最適合你的方法,以達(dá)到指南建議的水平”。
他承認(rèn),,這項研究的局限性在于他們只對參與者進行了為期一周的跟蹤調(diào)查,;不過,胡爾希德說,,為期一周的跟蹤調(diào)查似乎仍能反映人們的常規(guī)活動習(xí)慣,。
增強鍛煉者的能力
胡爾希德說,那些努力每周鍛煉超過一兩天的人可以把這項研究看作是對他們選擇的日常生活和繁忙日程的認(rèn)可,。
“能夠說'達(dá)到你需要的運動量,,但如何運動并不重要,重要的是進行鍛煉,,這能賦予人們力量,。"胡爾希德說。
胡爾希德說:“我們沒必要對人們應(yīng)該如何進行鍛煉施加不必要的限制或是增加某個人的鍛煉難度,,比如說‘你必須每周鍛煉五天,,每次鍛煉30分鐘’。找到適合自己的習(xí)慣并堅持下去更能賦予你力量,?!?/p>
胡爾希德希望這些發(fā)現(xiàn)能推動他就這一主題開展更多研究,比如一年中需要多少周達(dá)到150分鐘的閾值才能對健康有益,。他說,,理想情況下,參與者將佩戴活動追蹤器數(shù)年,,以便有更多的長期數(shù)據(jù)可供分析,。(財富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:中慧言-王芳
When you feel like you’ve barely got enough time in the day as it is, getting at least two and a half hours of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per week can feel almost impossible.
That number comes from the CDC’s recommendations for all adults, which suggests breaking up the 150 minutes into 30 minutes a day, five days a week, in addition to two days of strength training for all major muscle groups.
Working out five days a week might not be realistic for parents juggling full-time jobs and kids’ busy schedules, or people working shifts demanding 12 hours at a time. Many barely have the energy to cook dinner at the end of a long day.
Those people might be inclined to become “weekend warriors”—people who save their workouts for the weekend. And there’s good news for those weekend warriors: A new study published in Circulation journal indicates one to two days of exercise might be just as beneficial as exercising throughout the week, if you are still hitting those overall physical activity guidelines.
A case for ‘weekend warriors’
“It’s hard to get somebody to engage multiple times per week, if it’s a large time commitment or a spread out time commitment,” says Dr. Shaan Khurshid, lead author of the study and a faculty member in the Demoulas Center for Cardiac Arrhythmias at Massachusetts General Hospital.
Khurshid tells Fortune that he observed as busy lifestyles are becoming more common, more people are concentrating their exercise into one or two days. That set him and his team out to answer the question: Do those who exercise 20–30 minutes most days reap more health benefits than those who opt for longer exercise sessions on one or two days of the week?
Not necessarily, it seems.
Weekend warriors and regular exercisers had an almost equally lowered risk of developing 264 diseases, especially hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and sleep apnea.
Khurshid and his colleagues examined data on 89,573 individuals wearing physical activity trackers on their wrists for a full week. 30,228 participants were classified as the inactive group (exercising less than 150 minutes per week), 37,872 were in the weekend warrior group (exercising for at least 150 minutes, one to two days per week), and 21,473 were in the regular group (exercising for at least 150 minutes dispersed throughout the week).
All participants were engaging in moderate-to-vigorous exercise—what Khurshid defines as activity that gets your heart rate up to the point where speaking is hard, and singing is almost impossible. That includes activities like jogging or playing a sport, he says.
Both weekend warrior and regular activity patterns had similarly reduced health risks compared to the inactive group for all disease categories tested, including: heart attack (27% and 35% reduced risk respectively), stroke (21% and 17% lower risk), and diabetes (43% and 46% lower risks, respectively).
“We didn’t see any diseases where one [workout] pattern was better than the other,” Khurshid tells Fortune.
150 minutes of exercise is still the magic number
If you’re working out just two days out of the week, you’ll probably have to concentrate a good amount of exercise into that short period. Weekend warrior and regular activity patterns had similar benefits because the participants exercised for a similar total volume during the week.
The regular during-the-week exercisers had a median volume of 418 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, while the weekend warriors had a median volume of 288 minutes. What’s most important here is they all were well above the 150 minutes per week guideline from the CDC.
Khurshid says the bottom line is “however works for you best to get those guideline recommended levels.”
He acknowledged that a limitation of the study was that they only tracked participants for one week; however, Khurshid says, one week of tracking still seems to be indicative of people’s regular activity habits.
Empowered exercisers
Khurshid says people who are struggling to work out more than a day or two per week can see this study as validating their chosen routines and busy schedules.
“It’s empowering to be able to say, ‘Get the volume that you need to get, but it doesn’t matter how you do it. It’s important that you do it,’” Khurshid says.
“We don’t need to unnecessarily put constraints on how somebody should get their activity or make it harder for somebody to get their activity by saying, ‘You’ve got to do five days a week, you’ve got to do 30 minutes at a time,’” Khusrhid says. “It empowers you to find a routine that works for you and stick with it.”
Khurshid is hoping that these findings will catapult him into more research on the topic, such as how many weeks in a year you need to hit that 150-minute threshold to see health benefits. Ideally, participants will wear activity trackers for years, he says, to have more long-term data to analyze.