雇主和員工普遍達成共識的一點是:初級員工并不適合這份工作,。
技術(shù)教育提供商General Assembly的一份最新報告顯示,不足半數(shù)的員工(48%)和僅有12%的中層管理人員認為,,如今的入門級員工已經(jīng)為職場做好了充分準備。
導(dǎo)致對新員工信心不足的主要原因何在,?根據(jù)受訪經(jīng)理們的看法,關(guān)鍵在于新員工未能掌握實現(xiàn)職場成功所需的軟技能,,例如溝通,、協(xié)作和適應(yīng)能力。
General Assembly首席商務(wù)官喬丹·海瑟薇(Jourdan Hathaway)在一份聲明中寫道:“入門級員工的渠道已經(jīng)出現(xiàn)了斷裂,。企業(yè)必須重新審視其招聘,、培訓(xùn)和聘用員工的策略,。”
海瑟薇補充稱,,對于那些致力于解決這一問題的雇主來說,,確實存在許多基于證據(jù)的方法來加強員工的準備工作?!袄纾夹g(shù)學徒和技能培訓(xùn)項目為員工提供了模擬真實工作環(huán)境的經(jīng)驗,,使他們能夠在掌握技術(shù)技能的同時培養(yǎng)溝通和協(xié)作能力?!?/p>
為撰寫這份報告,General Assembly對美國和英國的1180名員工以及393名副總裁或總監(jiān)級別管理人員進行了調(diào)查,。
近四分之一的高管表示,他們不會雇傭目前的入門級員工,。各級員工中約有23%的人持相同觀點,,其中包括三分之一的嬰兒潮一代,。
錯過真正的價值
即使是初級員工也能意識到,,他們在某些關(guān)鍵領(lǐng)域存在缺失。
五分之二(40%)的Z世代受訪者(其中許多是新入職的員工)表示,,缺乏軟技能是他們職業(yè)發(fā)展的主要短板,。高管和員工都認為,技術(shù)技能以及正確的工作態(tài)度同樣是他們職業(yè)成長中需要加強的關(guān)鍵領(lǐng)域,。
不過,這并非完全是年輕員工的責任,。許多人在疫情封鎖期間度過了大學時光,,由于實習機會的取消或受完全遠程的工作的束縛,他們錯過了建立人脈和獲得面對面專業(yè)指導(dǎo)的機會,。
三分之一的高管和相似比例的員工認為,,公司未能為新員工提供充分的培訓(xùn)支持,,這種做法實際上為他們的失敗或至少是表現(xiàn)不佳埋下伏筆。
在那些確實為培訓(xùn)津貼或基金預(yù)留預(yù)算的公司中,近一半的公司表示,,員工“有時,、很少或從不”使用這些預(yù)算,。這很可能是由于缺乏參與的動力或時間,,甚至可能是因為他們覺得自己不是問題所在,。
耐人尋味的是,美國和英國的員工在這個問題上存在分歧,;英國員工認為政府在幫助員工為工作做好準備方面承擔一定責任的可能性是美國員工的兩倍多。英國雇主持相同觀點的可能性是美國雇主的7倍,。
盡管有人工智能,,軟技能仍然占據(jù)主導(dǎo)地位
General Assembly的報告發(fā)現(xiàn),,即使未來變得越來越數(shù)字化,,人情味仍然至關(guān)重要,。最近的其他一些報告也印證了這一點,。
今年1月,,哈里斯民意調(diào)查公司(Harris Poll)專門為《財富》雜志進行的一項調(diào)查發(fā)現(xiàn),,82%的管理者表示,,Z世代新員工的軟技能需要更多指導(dǎo),,也需要花費更多時間培訓(xùn),。他們還認為,Z世代往往對職場抱有不切實際的期望——比如快速晉升的時間表,、充足的靈活性空間,,或者始終保持工作與生活的平衡——而且他們在軟技能方面的培訓(xùn)比技術(shù)技能方面的培訓(xùn)更具挑戰(zhàn)性,。
職場教育平臺培生(Pearson)在2024年9月進行的一項研究發(fā)現(xiàn),1.1億份招聘信息提到了溝通這一最受歡迎的軟技能,,而數(shù)據(jù)分析這一人工智能相關(guān)技能僅在900萬份招聘信息中被提及,。
此外,在德勤(Deloitte)最近的一項研究中,,員工們將團隊合作列為他們最看重的技能,,其次是溝通和領(lǐng)導(dǎo)能力。只有編碼這一技術(shù)性較強的技能排在第四位,,其次是數(shù)據(jù)分析。
許多《財富》世界500強企業(yè)已經(jīng)開始響應(yīng)這一號召,。比如,微軟(Microsoft)就與虛擬教育平臺Coursera合作,,為員工提供包括數(shù)據(jù)分析在內(nèi)的硬技能和溝通在內(nèi)的軟技能培訓(xùn)和認證,。埃森哲(Accenture)首席執(zhí)行官朱莉·斯威特(Julie Sweet)自上任首日起就把持續(xù)學習放在首位。今年,,她的公司收購了與Coursera類似的人工智能學習平臺Udacity,,以持續(xù)推進這一使命,,并將技能提升作為優(yōu)先事項。
德勤首席學習官安東尼·斯蒂芬(Anthony Stephan)寫道,如果企業(yè)過于重視技術(shù)培訓(xùn),,而忽略“人類長期所需的能力,如發(fā)散性思維,、情感敏捷性和韌性,,最終可能會阻礙創(chuàng)新,導(dǎo)致員工在領(lǐng)導(dǎo)團隊,、把握市場機遇和充分利用技術(shù)潛力方面能力不足”,。
General Assembly也持同樣的看法,。
General Assembly校友參與和雇主合作主管盧佩·科朗吉洛(Lupe Colangelo)在報告中寫道:“當我們觀察到一種趨勢對如此多人產(chǎn)生影響時,,我們必須后退一步,,深思熟慮這個系統(tǒng)需要做出哪些改變,。人們顯然需要更多的支持才能順利進入職場并取得成功。我們不能僅僅指望個別員工憑一己之力來彌合當前的技能差距,。”(財富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:中慧言-王芳
雇主和員工普遍達成共識的一點是:初級員工并不適合這份工作,。
技術(shù)教育提供商General Assembly的一份最新報告顯示,,不足半數(shù)的員工(48%)和僅有12%的中層管理人員認為,,如今的入門級員工已經(jīng)為職場做好了充分準備,。
導(dǎo)致對新員工信心不足的主要原因何在,?根據(jù)受訪經(jīng)理們的看法,關(guān)鍵在于新員工未能掌握實現(xiàn)職場成功所需的軟技能,,例如溝通、協(xié)作和適應(yīng)能力,。
General Assembly首席商務(wù)官喬丹·海瑟薇(Jourdan Hathaway)在一份聲明中寫道:“入門級員工的渠道已經(jīng)出現(xiàn)了斷裂,。企業(yè)必須重新審視其招聘,、培訓(xùn)和聘用員工的策略,?!?/p>
海瑟薇補充稱,對于那些致力于解決這一問題的雇主來說,,確實存在許多基于證據(jù)的方法來加強員工的準備工作?!袄?,技術(shù)學徒和技能培訓(xùn)項目為員工提供了模擬真實工作環(huán)境的經(jīng)驗,使他們能夠在掌握技術(shù)技能的同時培養(yǎng)溝通和協(xié)作能力,。”
為撰寫這份報告,,General Assembly對美國和英國的1180名員工以及393名副總裁或總監(jiān)級別管理人員進行了調(diào)查。
近四分之一的高管表示,,他們不會雇傭目前的入門級員工,。各級員工中約有23%的人持相同觀點,,其中包括三分之一的嬰兒潮一代,。
錯過真正的價值
即使是初級員工也能意識到,,他們在某些關(guān)鍵領(lǐng)域存在缺失。
五分之二(40%)的Z世代受訪者(其中許多是新入職的員工)表示,,缺乏軟技能是他們職業(yè)發(fā)展的主要短板,。高管和員工都認為,技術(shù)技能以及正確的工作態(tài)度同樣是他們職業(yè)成長中需要加強的關(guān)鍵領(lǐng)域,。
不過,,這并非完全是年輕員工的責任。許多人在疫情封鎖期間度過了大學時光,,由于實習機會的取消或受完全遠程的工作的束縛,,他們錯過了建立人脈和獲得面對面專業(yè)指導(dǎo)的機會。
三分之一的高管和相似比例的員工認為,,公司未能為新員工提供充分的培訓(xùn)支持,,這種做法實際上為他們的失敗或至少是表現(xiàn)不佳埋下伏筆。
在那些確實為培訓(xùn)津貼或基金預(yù)留預(yù)算的公司中,,近一半的公司表示,,員工“有時、很少或從不”使用這些預(yù)算,。這很可能是由于缺乏參與的動力或時間,,甚至可能是因為他們覺得自己不是問題所在。
耐人尋味的是,,美國和英國的員工在這個問題上存在分歧,;英國員工認為政府在幫助員工為工作做好準備方面承擔一定責任的可能性是美國員工的兩倍多。英國雇主持相同觀點的可能性是美國雇主的7倍,。
盡管有人工智能,,軟技能仍然占據(jù)主導(dǎo)地位
General Assembly的報告發(fā)現(xiàn),即使未來變得越來越數(shù)字化,,人情味仍然至關(guān)重要,。最近的其他一些報告也印證了這一點。
今年1月,,哈里斯民意調(diào)查公司(Harris Poll)專門為《財富》雜志進行的一項調(diào)查發(fā)現(xiàn),,82%的管理者表示,Z世代新員工的軟技能需要更多指導(dǎo),,也需要花費更多時間培訓(xùn),。他們還認為,,Z世代往往對職場抱有不切實際的期望——比如快速晉升的時間表、充足的靈活性空間,,或者始終保持工作與生活的平衡——而且他們在軟技能方面的培訓(xùn)比技術(shù)技能方面的培訓(xùn)更具挑戰(zhàn)性,。
職場教育平臺培生(Pearson)在2024年9月進行的一項研究發(fā)現(xiàn),1.1億份招聘信息提到了溝通這一最受歡迎的軟技能,,而數(shù)據(jù)分析這一人工智能相關(guān)技能僅在900萬份招聘信息中被提及,。
此外,在德勤(Deloitte)最近的一項研究中,,員工們將團隊合作列為他們最看重的技能,,其次是溝通和領(lǐng)導(dǎo)能力。只有編碼這一技術(shù)性較強的技能排在第四位,,其次是數(shù)據(jù)分析,。
許多《財富》世界500強企業(yè)已經(jīng)開始響應(yīng)這一號召。比如,,微軟(Microsoft)就與虛擬教育平臺Coursera合作,,為員工提供包括數(shù)據(jù)分析在內(nèi)的硬技能和溝通在內(nèi)的軟技能培訓(xùn)和認證。埃森哲(Accenture)首席執(zhí)行官朱莉·斯威特(Julie Sweet)自上任首日起就把持續(xù)學習放在首位,。今年,她的公司收購了與Coursera類似的人工智能學習平臺Udacity,,以持續(xù)推進這一使命,,并將技能提升作為優(yōu)先事項。
德勤首席學習官安東尼·斯蒂芬(Anthony Stephan)寫道,,如果企業(yè)過于重視技術(shù)培訓(xùn),,而忽略“人類長期所需的能力,如發(fā)散性思維,、情感敏捷性和韌性,,最終可能會阻礙創(chuàng)新,導(dǎo)致員工在領(lǐng)導(dǎo)團隊,、把握市場機遇和充分利用技術(shù)潛力方面能力不足”,。
General Assembly也持同樣的看法。
General Assembly校友參與和雇主合作主管盧佩·科朗吉洛(Lupe Colangelo)在報告中寫道:“當我們觀察到一種趨勢對如此多人產(chǎn)生影響時,,我們必須后退一步,,深思熟慮這個系統(tǒng)需要做出哪些改變。人們顯然需要更多的支持才能順利進入職場并取得成功,。我們不能僅僅指望個別員工憑一己之力來彌合當前的技能差距,。”(財富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:中慧言-王芳
One thing both bosses and workers can agree on: Entry-level workers aren’t cut out for the job.
Fewer than half of workers (48%) and just 12% of mid-level executives think today’s entry-level workers are adequately prepared for the workforce, according to a new report from General Assembly, a technology education provider.
The biggest factors driving this lack of confidence? Managers polled feel new workforce entrants don’t have the requisite soft skills—like communication, collaboration, and adaptability—needed to thrive at work.
“The entry-level employee pipeline is broken,” Jourdan Hathaway, General Assembly’s chief business officer, wrote in a statement. “Companies must rethink how they source, train, and onboard employees.”
For bosses committed to tackling the issue, there’s no shortage of evidence-based approaches to beefing up workforce readiness, Hathaway added. “Technology apprenticeships and skill training programs, for example, provide employees with experience that mimics a real work environment, allowing them to build communication and collaboration skills alongside technical skills.”
For the report, General Assembly surveyed 1,180 workers across the U.S. and U.K., as well as 393 VPs or director-level managers.
Nearly one in four of those executives said they wouldn’t hire today’s entry-level employees. About 23% of all employees, at all levels, said the same—including one in three baby boomers.
Missing the real value
Even the entry-level workers can tell they’re missing something crucial.
Two in five (40%) of Gen Z respondents—many of whom are the new hires in question—say that lacking soft skills is a major shortcoming in their career advancement. Also high on the list, according to both executives and workers, are technical skills—and coming into work with the right attitude.
Then again, it’s not entirely younger workers’ fault. Many spent their college years in pandemic lockdowns, hamstrung by canceled internships or fully remote roles, and thus missed opportunities for networking and in-person professional mentoring.
One in three executives—and a similar share of employees—agreed that companies don’t provide adequate training for new hires, effectively setting them up for failure, or at least underperformance.
Among the companies that actually do set aside a budget for training stipends or funds, nearly half said employees “sometimes, rarely, or never” use them. That’s likely due to a lack of motivation or time—or maybe even the sense that they’re not the problem.
Interestingly, U.S. and U.K. employees diverge somewhat on the issue; U.K. employees were more than twice as likely to believe the government bears some responsibility for job preparedness than American workers. U.K. bosses were seven times more likely than U.S. bosses to say the same.
Despite AI, soft skills still reign supreme
Even as the future becomes increasingly digitized, the human touch remains vital, General Assembly’s report finds. That’s been echoed by a smattering of other recent reports.
A Harris Poll carried out exclusively for Fortune in January found that 82% of managers said their new Gen Z hires’ soft skills require more guidance, time, and training. They also think Gen Zers often have unrealistic workplace expectations—like speedy promotion timelines, ample room for flexibility, or consistent work-life balance—and they’re harder to train in soft skills than in technical skills.
A September 2024 study by workplace education platform Pearson found that communication—the most in-demand soft skill—was mentioned in 110 million job listings, while data analysis—an AI skill—appeared in only 9 million.
Plus, in a recent Deloitte study, workers put teamwork as their number-one valued skill, followed by communication and leadership. Only in fourth place did a more technical skill—coding—make the list, followed by data analysis.
Many Fortune 500 companies are already heeding the call. Microsoft, for one, has partnered with virtual education platform Coursera to offer workers courses and certificates in hard (data analysis) and soft (communication) skills alike. Accenture CEO Julie Sweet has prioritized continual learning from her first day on the job, and this year her company bought Udacity, an AI learning platform akin to Coursera, to build on that mission and prioritize upskilling.
Companies that put too much stock in technical training at the expense of “enduring human capabilities—like divergent thinking, emotional agility, [and] resilience—could end up impeding innovation and leaving employees ill-equipped to lead teams, adapt to market opportunities, and fully harness the potential of technology,” Anthony Stephan, Deloitte’s chief learning officer, wrote.
General Assembly said much the same.
“When we see a trend impacting so many people, we have to take a step back and consider that the system needs to change,” Lupe Colangelo, director of alumni engagement and employer partnerships at General Assembly, wrote in the report. “People clearly need more support to enter the workforce and succeed. We can’t expect individual employees to close today’s skills gaps on their own.”