如果你已經(jīng)有一份很好的紙質(zhì)簡(jiǎn)歷了（或者是PDF版本的），那么,，招聘經(jīng)理會(huì)不會(huì)在乎你有沒(méi)有領(lǐng)英的個(gè)人主頁(yè)呢,？根據(jù)一項(xiàng)最新研究，答案絕對(duì)是肯定的,。

簡(jiǎn)歷撰寫(xiě)服務(wù)公司ResumeGo發(fā)現(xiàn),，求職者如果在領(lǐng)英網(wǎng)上有一個(gè)“全面的”個(gè)人主頁(yè)，那他獲得面試的機(jī)會(huì),，會(huì)比完全沒(méi)有領(lǐng)英個(gè)人頁(yè)面的求職者高出71%,。

ResumeGo公司的CEO彼得·楊告訴《財(cái)富》雜志，如果求職者的簡(jiǎn)歷附上了領(lǐng)英頁(yè)面的鏈接,，但領(lǐng)英頁(yè)面十分簡(jiǎn)略,，只有“不到500個(gè)字的簡(jiǎn)介，5個(gè)以下的關(guān)系人,，對(duì)頁(yè)面中的工作經(jīng)歷也沒(méi)有任何描述”,，那么，這名求職者甚至更加難以接到面試電話,。

彼得·楊指出：“很多人認(rèn)為,，領(lǐng)英的主要優(yōu)點(diǎn)是社交和建立圈子，這確實(shí)是這個(gè)網(wǎng)站的一大優(yōu)點(diǎn),。這也導(dǎo)致很多通過(guò)其他途徑（如招聘網(wǎng)站和中介機(jī)構(gòu)等）求職的人要么沒(méi)有領(lǐng)英頁(yè)面,，要么就是把領(lǐng)英頁(yè)面寫(xiě)得很差。他們沒(méi)有意識(shí)到,，在簡(jiǎn)歷里附上一個(gè)全面的領(lǐng)英頁(yè)面,，本身就是一個(gè)加分項(xiàng)，更容易為求職者帶來(lái)更多的面試機(jī)會(huì),?！?/p>

If you have a good paper (or, more likely, pdf) version of your resume, do hiring managers really care whether or not you have a LinkedIn profile? According to a new study, the answer is an overwhelming yes.

The CV and resume writing service ResumeGo found that applicants who included a link to a “comprehensive” LinkedIn profile on their resume were 71% more likely to get a job interview than applicants who didn’t have a LinkedIn profile at all.

Resumes featuring a “bare bones” LinkedIn—which ResumeGo CEO Peter Yang qualified to Fortune as a “profile summary of under 500 characters, less than or equal to 5 connections, and no descriptions completed for any of the work experiences listed”—were even less likely to nab a job callback.

“A lot of people believe that the primary benefit of LinkedIn is to network and build connections, which is indeed an awesome benefit of the website,” Yang said. “The result of this is that people who choose to find jobs through other avenues (e.g. job boards, recruitment agencies, etc…) tend to have either a poorly written LinkedIn profile or no LinkedIn profile at all. They don’t realize that having a comprehensive LinkedIn profile included on the resume itself is a huge plus in terms of landing more interviews.”

實(shí)驗(yàn)方法

為了驗(yàn)證這個(gè)結(jié)論,，從2018年10月8日到2019年3月8日，ResumeGo公司在多家求職網(wǎng)站（包括Glassdoor,、ZipRecruiter,、Indeed等）創(chuàng)建和上傳了24,570份虛構(gòu)的簡(jiǎn)歷。

這些簡(jiǎn)歷共分為三類(lèi)：第一類(lèi)“求職者”沒(méi)有領(lǐng)英個(gè)人頁(yè)面,；第二類(lèi)只有“基礎(chǔ)的”領(lǐng)英頁(yè)面,；第三類(lèi)則有詳細(xì)的個(gè)人頁(yè)面，也就是個(gè)人簡(jiǎn)介在1000個(gè)字符以上,，聯(lián)系人在300個(gè)以上,，而且對(duì)以往工作經(jīng)歷有段落式或者要點(diǎn)式的描述。

彼得·楊告訴《財(cái)富》雜志：“三組的簡(jiǎn)歷是完全一樣的,，唯一的區(qū)別是第一組完全沒(méi)有領(lǐng)英頁(yè)面,，第二組只有一個(gè)簡(jiǎn)略的領(lǐng)英頁(yè)面，第三組則有一個(gè)詳細(xì)的領(lǐng)英頁(yè)面,?！泵拷M內(nèi)的簡(jiǎn)歷略有區(qū)別，以相應(yīng)地反映招聘職位的行業(yè)和水平,。

在實(shí)驗(yàn)中,，每組都提交了8190份申請(qǐng)。彼得·楊表示：“對(duì)發(fā)布的每個(gè)職位,，我們只會(huì)從第一、二,、三組中選擇一份簡(jiǎn)歷提交,。”

研究發(fā)現(xiàn)

5個(gè)月的實(shí)驗(yàn)結(jié)束后,，ResumeGo公司發(fā)現(xiàn),，擁有“全面”領(lǐng)英頁(yè)面的求職者，獲得面試通知的機(jī)率是13.5%,；沒(méi)有領(lǐng)英頁(yè)面的求職者獲得面試通知的機(jī)率是7.9%,； 只擁有“基本”領(lǐng)英頁(yè)面的求職者，獲得面試通知的機(jī)率則只有7.2%,。

不過(guò)彼得·楊也提出,，隨著職務(wù)等級(jí)的提高（從初級(jí)職位到中級(jí)職位，再到管理職位）,，領(lǐng)英頁(yè)面的重要性是逐步下降的,。

所以如果你還處在職業(yè)金字塔的下層，及時(shí)在領(lǐng)英上更新你的網(wǎng)絡(luò)簡(jiǎn)歷,，或許也是你通往成功的重要一步,。（財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)）

譯者：樸成奎

The Methodology

In the end, ResumeGo came to this conclusion after creating and submitting 24,570 fictitious resumes to jobs listed on various career search websites (including Glassdoor, ZipRecruiter, and Indeed) between October 8, 2018, and March 8, 2019.

These resumes fell into three different categories: Group 1 “applicants” didn’t have a LinkedIn profile, Group 2 had a “bare bones” LinkedIn, and Group 3 had a “comprehensive” LinkedIn profiles with 1000 character plus profile summaries, over 300 connections, and either paragraph or bullet-point descriptions of past jobs.

“For every resume we created for Group 1, we included an exactly identical resume in Group 2 (except with a bare-bones LinkedIn profile) and an exactly identical resume in Group 3 (except with a comprehensive LinkedIn profile),” Yang told Fortune. And the resumes differed to appropriately reflect the job posting’s industry and level.

Each group submitted resumes to 8,190 jobs, and Yang said that “for each job posting, we only ever submitted one resume from either Group 1, 2, or 3.”

The Findings

At the conclusion of the five-month field experiment, ResumeGo found that applicants with “comprehensive” LinkedIn profiles had a 13.5% callback rate, applicants without LinkedIn profiles had a 7.9% callback rate, and applicants with “bare bones” LinkedIn profiles had a 7.2% callback rate.

However, Yang notes, as the job level increased (from entry-level to mid-level to managerial-level), the importance of the LinkedIn profile decreased.

So if you’re on the lower end of the corporate ladder, updating your online resume could be an important step in your rise to the top.