亚色在线观看_亚洲人成a片高清在线观看不卡_亚洲中文无码亚洲人成频_免费在线黄片,69精品视频九九精品视频,美女大黄三级,人人干人人g,全新av网站每日更新播放,亚洲三及片,wwww无码视频,亚洲中文字幕无码一区在线

首頁 500強(qiáng) 活動 榜單 商業(yè) 科技 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力 專題 品牌中心
雜志訂閱

一覺醒來賬戶里多了1200美元,怎么花最合算

Anne Sraders
2020-04-21

雖然錢包里多了1200美元,,但很多美國人卻高興不起來。

文本設(shè)置
小號
默認(rèn)
大號
Plus(0條)

本周許多美國人一覺醒來后發(fā)現(xiàn),銀行賬戶中多了1200美元或者更多,。

通常情況下,,這本應(yīng)是歡天喜地的大好事,但許多美國卻人高興不起來。過去幾周他們的生活徹底亂套了:非必須行業(yè)紛紛關(guān)門歇業(yè),,員工們縮在家中辦公,失業(yè)率大幅攀升,。那些看起來很普通很日常的活動也都被叫停了,,直至進(jìn)一步通知的下達(dá)。

穆迪分析公司的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家馬克·贊迪最近發(fā)表報告稱:“商業(yè)停擺擾亂了供應(yīng)端,,這是迄今為止經(jīng)濟(jì)受重創(chuàng)的最主要因素?!辈贿^,,來自需求端(家庭正縮減支出)的負(fù)面影響也開始顯現(xiàn)。

人生突然脫軌,,這讓許多美國人無所適從,。如果說黑暗中尚存些許光亮的話,,那就是最近通過的《冠狀病毒援助、救濟(jì)和經(jīng)濟(jì)安全法案》了,,政府將投入2.2萬億美元來刺激經(jīng)濟(jì):中低收入的美國人可收到1200美元(夫婦為2400美元)的經(jīng)濟(jì)刺激支票,,外加每個受撫養(yǎng)人500美元,。

“刺激”這一詞用在這里實(shí)在耐人尋味。在密歇根大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家賈斯汀·沃爾夫斯看來,,政府發(fā)放的這些支票跟以往的經(jīng)濟(jì)刺激措施不一樣,,并非為了使消費(fèi)者進(jìn)店購物或者刺激消費(fèi),,實(shí)際上是為了幫助民眾渡過難關(guān)。

“經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退不同以往,,刺激措施也大不同,。”沃爾夫斯對《財富》雜志說,,“這是一場因政府要求民眾停工歇業(yè),、遠(yuǎn)離商店而造成的經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退,?!?/p>

談及刺激措施和減稅對經(jīng)濟(jì)的影響時,德意志銀行的美國高級經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家布雷特·瑞安指出了其中存在的“乘數(shù)效應(yīng)”,。

從本質(zhì)上來說,,這種效應(yīng)是由于注入支出而產(chǎn)生的國內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值的增長。瑞安說,,在市場連鎖反應(yīng)下,,經(jīng)濟(jì)刺激的乘數(shù)效應(yīng)在0.3美元至0.8美元之間——或者換句話說,依據(jù)你對每一美元補(bǔ)貼的使用情況,,這一美元還能再產(chǎn)生0.3美元至0.8美元的效益,。

瑞安稱,使用現(xiàn)金補(bǔ)貼的措施表明,,政府“在對經(jīng)濟(jì)采取應(yīng)急之策”。他告訴《財富》雜志,,這意味著政府拿不出多少手段來刺激經(jīng)濟(jì),,只能修補(bǔ)一下流動性缺口。現(xiàn)金補(bǔ)貼最主要的目的就是“幫民眾活下去”,,現(xiàn)時交房租,、買食物以及支付其它賬單是重中之重,。

不過,對于基本上陷入停頓的經(jīng)濟(jì),,乘數(shù)效應(yīng)若能達(dá)到0.8美元這一目標(biāo),,當(dāng)然是最好不過了。一些經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家說,,為了達(dá)到這個目標(biāo),,民眾應(yīng)盡量把錢花在本土商家身上。

讓每一塊錢發(fā)揮最大作用,。

有些研究表明,,把錢花在本地商店,,乘數(shù)效應(yīng)會更顯著,。緬因州經(jīng)濟(jì)政策中心在2011年進(jìn)行的一項研究發(fā)現(xiàn),,在本地企業(yè)身上消費(fèi)100美元,對當(dāng)?shù)亟?jīng)濟(jì)就會產(chǎn)生58美元的額外效益,而在連鎖商店(即使是你家旁邊的連鎖店)則為33美元,。原因是,,本土企業(yè)老板更可能將賺到的錢再次投入到當(dāng)?shù)亟?jīng)濟(jì)中,從而開啟良性循環(huán),。在新冠疫情造成的停工歇業(yè)期間,,把錢花在本地商家身上,有助于它們渡過難關(guān),。

哥倫比亞大學(xué)巴納德學(xué)院的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)助理教授貝琳達(dá)·阿奇邦指出,,過往探討現(xiàn)金補(bǔ)助的廣泛影響研究表明,,當(dāng)民眾只會把錢花在食物、住房,、衣服等必需品中(正如他們現(xiàn)在所做的那樣),,而不是去幫襯本地商家時,將對宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)產(chǎn)生極大的沖擊,?!?/p>

經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家建議,如果你平時經(jīng)常出外就餐,,那就繼續(xù)出外就餐,而不是叫外賣或者把錢捐給本地超市,、餐館和咖啡店,。

阿奇邦教授指出,這樣“你的補(bǔ)助金才能發(fā)揮最大的宏觀溢出效應(yīng),。(現(xiàn)金補(bǔ)助)不僅幫助了你,,還可以幫到本地商家,?!碑?dāng)談及乘數(shù)效應(yīng)時,,她說,經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家從兩個層面考慮這個問題:國內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值及其分配(流向不同區(qū)域,、企業(yè),、個人和家庭的份額)。

“如果把錢盡量花在本地,,那么相比花在亞馬遜等大型企業(yè)身上,,花在本地的商家、企業(yè),、產(chǎn)品身上產(chǎn)生的效益確實(shí)更大,,對本地經(jīng)濟(jì)有著非常積極的影響?!卑⑵姘罱淌谡f,。她住在紐約布朗克斯區(qū),,自己就經(jīng)常光顧附近一家當(dāng)?shù)厝碎_的韓國雜貨店。

而Bankrate.com的首席經(jīng)濟(jì)分析師馬克·漢姆里克則對《財富》雜志說,,在消費(fèi)應(yīng)該具有怎樣的社會責(zé)任這個問題上,每個人都會有不同的態(tài)度,。漢姆里克一直在幫襯華盛頓特區(qū)一家本地人開的意大利餐館,,從那里購買外帶食品,他說“大家都想盡力幫助這個餐館”,。

很多人或許情愿安坐家中,想買什么就上亞馬遜等購物網(wǎng)站,。一些經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家說,,在封鎖措施仍然實(shí)施的情況下,這樣的做法弊大于利,。

密歇根大學(xué)的沃爾夫斯指出,,亞馬遜的送貨業(yè)務(wù)其實(shí)已經(jīng)超負(fù)荷運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)了,。“因此,,現(xiàn)在不要買新沙發(fā)了,。”他說,。他建議等限制令取消后再去買,。

德意志銀行的瑞安補(bǔ)充道,如果財力允許且有打算,,那現(xiàn)在就預(yù)訂明年的旅游出行和機(jī)票,讓相關(guān)企業(yè)增加收入和現(xiàn)金流,?!疤崆邦A(yù)訂有助于幫助一些企業(yè)熬過難關(guān),。”他說,。

然而限制封鎖措施取消后,民眾的消費(fèi)能否恢復(fù)到之前的力度呢,?

沃爾夫斯的答案很簡短:“沒人知道,。”一旦限制措施取消,,德意志銀行的瑞安推測“市場將迎來民眾受抑制的需求”,,然而“不幸的是,,在經(jīng)歷這么大的沖擊之后,得經(jīng)過好幾年,,消費(fèi)者信心才能恢復(fù)到之前的水平”,。

一些經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家表示,這一輪的刺激措施,,暫時對整個經(jīng)濟(jì)的作用不會太大,。密歇根大學(xué)的沃爾夫斯說:“大家要做的就是多花錢,給家人買健康,、買快樂、買食物,?!保ㄘ敻恢形木W(wǎng))

譯者:李耀和

本周許多美國人一覺醒來后發(fā)現(xiàn),銀行賬戶中多了1200美元或者更多,。

通常情況下,這本應(yīng)是歡天喜地的大好事,,但許多美國卻人高興不起來,。過去幾周他們的生活徹底亂套了:非必須行業(yè)紛紛關(guān)門歇業(yè),員工們縮在家中辦公,,失業(yè)率大幅攀升,。那些看起來很普通很日常的活動也都被叫停了,直至進(jìn)一步通知的下達(dá),。

穆迪分析公司的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家馬克·贊迪最近發(fā)表報告稱:“商業(yè)停擺擾亂了供應(yīng)端,這是迄今為止經(jīng)濟(jì)受重創(chuàng)的最主要因素,?!辈贿^,,來自需求端(家庭正縮減支出)的負(fù)面影響也開始顯現(xiàn)。

人生突然脫軌,,這讓許多美國人無所適從。如果說黑暗中尚存些許光亮的話,,那就是最近通過的《冠狀病毒援助,、救濟(jì)和經(jīng)濟(jì)安全法案》了,政府將投入2.2萬億美元來刺激經(jīng)濟(jì):中低收入的美國人可收到1200美元(夫婦為2400美元)的經(jīng)濟(jì)刺激支票,,外加每個受撫養(yǎng)人500美元,。

“刺激”這一詞用在這里實(shí)在耐人尋味,。在密歇根大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家賈斯汀·沃爾夫斯看來,政府發(fā)放的這些支票跟以往的經(jīng)濟(jì)刺激措施不一樣,,并非為了使消費(fèi)者進(jìn)店購物或者刺激消費(fèi),,實(shí)際上是為了幫助民眾渡過難關(guān)。

“經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退不同以往,,刺激措施也大不同?!蔽譅柗蛩箤Α敦敻弧冯s志說,“這是一場因政府要求民眾停工歇業(yè),、遠(yuǎn)離商店而造成的經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退,。”

談及刺激措施和減稅對經(jīng)濟(jì)的影響時,,德意志銀行的美國高級經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家布雷特·瑞安指出了其中存在的“乘數(shù)效應(yīng)”,。

從本質(zhì)上來說,這種效應(yīng)是由于注入支出而產(chǎn)生的國內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值的增長,。瑞安說,在市場連鎖反應(yīng)下,,經(jīng)濟(jì)刺激的乘數(shù)效應(yīng)在0.3美元至0.8美元之間——或者換句話說,,依據(jù)你對每一美元補(bǔ)貼的使用情況,這一美元還能再產(chǎn)生0.3美元至0.8美元的效益,。

瑞安稱,,使用現(xiàn)金補(bǔ)貼的措施表明,,政府“在對經(jīng)濟(jì)采取應(yīng)急之策”,。他告訴《財富》雜志,這意味著政府拿不出多少手段來刺激經(jīng)濟(jì),,只能修補(bǔ)一下流動性缺口?,F(xiàn)金補(bǔ)貼最主要的目的就是“幫民眾活下去”,現(xiàn)時交房租,、買食物以及支付其它賬單是重中之重,。

不過,,對于基本上陷入停頓的經(jīng)濟(jì),乘數(shù)效應(yīng)若能達(dá)到0.8美元這一目標(biāo),,當(dāng)然是最好不過了,。一些經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家說,為了達(dá)到這個目標(biāo),,民眾應(yīng)盡量把錢花在本土商家身上,。

讓每一塊錢發(fā)揮最大作用。

有些研究表明,,把錢花在本地商店,,乘數(shù)效應(yīng)會更顯著。緬因州經(jīng)濟(jì)政策中心在2011年進(jìn)行的一項研究發(fā)現(xiàn),,在本地企業(yè)身上消費(fèi)100美元,,對當(dāng)?shù)亟?jīng)濟(jì)就會產(chǎn)生58美元的額外效益,,而在連鎖商店(即使是你家旁邊的連鎖店)則為33美元。原因是,,本土企業(yè)老板更可能將賺到的錢再次投入到當(dāng)?shù)亟?jīng)濟(jì)中,,從而開啟良性循環(huán)。在新冠疫情造成的停工歇業(yè)期間,,把錢花在本地商家身上,,有助于它們渡過難關(guān)。

哥倫比亞大學(xué)巴納德學(xué)院的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)助理教授貝琳達(dá)·阿奇邦指出,,過往探討現(xiàn)金補(bǔ)助的廣泛影響研究表明,當(dāng)民眾只會把錢花在食物,、住房,、衣服等必需品中(正如他們現(xiàn)在所做的那樣),而不是去幫襯本地商家時,,將對宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)產(chǎn)生極大的沖擊,。”

經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家建議,,如果你平時經(jīng)常出外就餐,,那就繼續(xù)出外就餐,而不是叫外賣或者把錢捐給本地超市,、餐館和咖啡店,。

阿奇邦教授指出,這樣“你的補(bǔ)助金才能發(fā)揮最大的宏觀溢出效應(yīng),。(現(xiàn)金補(bǔ)助)不僅幫助了你,還可以幫到本地商家,?!碑?dāng)談及乘數(shù)效應(yīng)時,她說,,經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家從兩個層面考慮這個問題:國內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值及其分配(流向不同區(qū)域,、企業(yè)、個人和家庭的份額),。

“如果把錢盡量花在本地,那么相比花在亞馬遜等大型企業(yè)身上,,花在本地的商家,、企業(yè)、產(chǎn)品身上產(chǎn)生的效益確實(shí)更大,,對本地經(jīng)濟(jì)有著非常積極的影響,?!卑⑵姘罱淌谡f。她住在紐約布朗克斯區(qū),,自己就經(jīng)常光顧附近一家當(dāng)?shù)厝碎_的韓國雜貨店,。

而Bankrate.com的首席經(jīng)濟(jì)分析師馬克·漢姆里克則對《財富》雜志說,在消費(fèi)應(yīng)該具有怎樣的社會責(zé)任這個問題上,,每個人都會有不同的態(tài)度,。漢姆里克一直在幫襯華盛頓特區(qū)一家本地人開的意大利餐館,從那里購買外帶食品,,他說“大家都想盡力幫助這個餐館”,。

很多人或許情愿安坐家中,,想買什么就上亞馬遜等購物網(wǎng)站,。一些經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家說,在封鎖措施仍然實(shí)施的情況下,,這樣的做法弊大于利,。

密歇根大學(xué)的沃爾夫斯指出,亞馬遜的送貨業(yè)務(wù)其實(shí)已經(jīng)超負(fù)荷運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)了,?!耙虼耍F(xiàn)在不要買新沙發(fā)了,。”他說,。他建議等限制令取消后再去買,。

德意志銀行的瑞安補(bǔ)充道,如果財力允許且有打算,,那現(xiàn)在就預(yù)訂明年的旅游出行和機(jī)票,讓相關(guān)企業(yè)增加收入和現(xiàn)金流,?!疤崆邦A(yù)訂有助于幫助一些企業(yè)熬過難關(guān)?!彼f,。

然而限制封鎖措施取消后,民眾的消費(fèi)能否恢復(fù)到之前的力度呢,?

沃爾夫斯的答案很簡短:“沒人知道,。”一旦限制措施取消,,德意志銀行的瑞安推測“市場將迎來民眾受抑制的需求”,,然而“不幸的是,在經(jīng)歷這么大的沖擊之后,,得經(jīng)過好幾年,,消費(fèi)者信心才能恢復(fù)到之前的水平”。

一些經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家表示,,這一輪的刺激措施,暫時對整個經(jīng)濟(jì)的作用不會太大,。密歇根大學(xué)的沃爾夫斯說:“大家要做的就是多花錢,,給家人買健康、買快樂、買食物,?!保ㄘ敻恢形木W(wǎng))

譯者:李耀和

Many Americans woke up this week with an extra $1,200 (or more) in their bank accounts.

In ordinary circumstances, it would likely be a reason to rejoice—but for the majority of Americans everywhere, the past few weeks have meant a complete overhaul of their lives: Nonessential businesses are closed, many employees are working from home, and unemployment is on the rise. Activities that seemed so normal, mundane even, have been put on pause until further notice.

According to a recent report by Moody's Analytics' economist Mark Zandi, "The damage to the economy to date has been mostly the result of the supply-side shock from the business shutdowns." But, the demand-side of the equation (households pulling back on their spending) "is just now hitting."

If there was one meager bright spot for many Americans adjusting to this temporary new way of life, it's the recent passage of the CARES Act and a $2.2 trillion stimulus package, that will provide low-and-middle income Americans with either $1,200 or $2,400 (for couples) stimulus checks, plus an additional $500 for every dependent.

But "stimulus" is an interesting word to use here. In fact, for Justin Wolfers, an economist at the University of Michigan, these checks aren't meant to get consumers into shops or stimulate spending, in the way a normal stimulus package would: they're intended for survival.

"This recession is different, which means this stimulus package is different," Wolfers tells Fortune. "This is a recession caused by the government wanting to get people out of work and out of the stores."

When it comes to thinking about the impact things like stimulus packages and tax cuts have on the economy, those like Deutsche Bank's senior U.S. economist Brett Ryan point out the "multiplier effect."

Essentially, the effect is an increase in the total GDP resulting from an injection of spending. Through a ripple effect, Ryan notes that multiples for economic stimulus are anywhere from $0.30 to $0.80 to the dollar—or, in other words, depending on how you spend each dollar of your stimulus check, it can go on to generate another $0.30-$0.80 cents.

With the checks, says Deutsche Bank's Ryan, the government is "in triage mode for the economy." That means "There’s not much you can do right now to spur on the economy—it’s all about covering a liquidity gap right now," he tells Fortune. And first and foremost, these cash grants were intended to "get people by," he notes—paying for rent, food, and other bills is the top priority.

But obviously, for an economy that has basically ground to a halt, getting closer to $0.80 to the dollar is the goal. And for those who are able, say some economists, one way is to spend your dollars locally.

Get the most bang for your stimulus bucks

Some studies suggest the multiplier effect may be more pronounced when you shop local. One study conducted in 2011 by the Maine Center for Economic Policy found that every $100 spent at locally owned businesses contributed an additional $58 to the local economy, versus $33 if spent at a chain store, even one located near you. The idea being, that local business owner is much more likely to put the proceeds from the transaction back into the local economy again, kicking off a virtuous cycle. And during the coronavirus shutdown, supporting your local businesses could help keep them afloat.

"One of the things that we’ve seen from previous studies in economics looking at the impacts of cash grants generally, is that where they’re having the biggest macroeconomic impact is when you see people spending as they would already be spending on necessities like food and housing and clothes and all of that, but directing your spending toward local businesses," notes Belinda Archibong, assistant economics professor at Barnard College of Columbia University.

If, in ordinary times, you went out to eat frequently, economists suggest keeping up those normal expenditures, instead getting takeout or donating to local supermarkets, restaurants, and coffee shops.

That's "where your stimulus money can have the biggest macro spillover effects," notes Archibong. "[The checks are] not just helping you but your local businesses as well." When it comes to the multiplier effect, Archibong says economists think of it in two ways: the big pie (GDP), and the distribution of the pie (how much is going to different regions, businesses, individuals, and households).

"If you spend more money locally, then yes, that distribution to local employers and local businesses and local producers will benefit more relative to the big Amazons and the big huge firms, which is a significant positive impact to these local economies," she says. For her part, Archibong is frequenting a local Korean grocery store in her neighborhood in the Bronx.

Others like Mark Hamrick, chief economic analyst at Bankrate.com, think each person is going to have a different response "to ultimately what they might view as their social responsibility connected to spending," he tells Fortune. Hamrick has been getting takeout from a locally-owned Italian restaurant "that we want to try to help," in the D.C. area.

While it may be tempting to spend your extra time at home online shopping on sites like Amazon, some economists suggest that may be doing more harm than good while restrictions remain in place.

In fact, the University of Michigan's Wolfers points out that Amazon delivery, for example, is already overloaded. "So, no, don’t buy a new couch today," he advises. Buy that "new couch the day the orders are lifted."

Deutsche's Ryan adds that, if you have the means and the visibility, booking travel and airline tickets now (for later in the year) could help companies' revenue and cash liquidity. "Booking things way in advance would be something to do that kind of helps companies get through," he says.

But once those restrictions are lifted, will consumer spending return to its former strength?

In short, Wolfers says, "No one has a clue." Others like Deutsche's Ryan speculate "You’re going to have the pent up demand," once restrictions are lifted, but "It takes years, unfortunately, to get [consumer] confidence back to those previous levels once people have experienced such a large shock."

While economists suggest this round of stimulus likely won't have too big an impact on the economy on the whole, for now, notes University of Michigan's Wolfers: "What you should do is spend money to keep your family healthy, happy, eating."

財富中文網(wǎng)所刊載內(nèi)容之知識產(chǎn)權(quán)為財富媒體知識產(chǎn)權(quán)有限公司及/或相關(guān)權(quán)利人專屬所有或持有,。未經(jīng)許可,禁止進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)載,、摘編,、復(fù)制及建立鏡像等任何使用。
0條Plus
精彩評論
評論

撰寫或查看更多評論

請打開財富Plus APP

前往打開
熱讀文章