在斯坦福大學(xué)外的街邊,,一套被當(dāng)作辦公室的兩臥室公寓塞滿(mǎn)了20名年輕的技術(shù)人員,。公寓內(nèi)的家具都是便宜貨,包括一張唇膏紅的沙發(fā),、不匹配的桌子和折疊椅,。
這家公司專(zhuān)注于為餐廳提供送餐服務(wù),但僅為公寓周邊的8家餐廳提供服務(wù),。公司的雇員,,不管從事什么工作,都會(huì)在一天當(dāng)中抽出一些時(shí)間去送餐,,目的是為了了解如何改善這一業(yè)務(wù),,哪怕只是將訂單送達(dá)時(shí)間縮短幾秒鐘。
送餐初創(chuàng)公司DoorDash首席執(zhí)行官徐訊說(shuō):“公司所有人都會(huì)去送餐,,與所擔(dān)任的職務(wù)無(wú)關(guān),。”那個(gè)時(shí)候,,這樣做的目的就是想“努力讓員工盡早地成為這方面的專(zhuān)家,。”
7年后,,DoorDash已經(jīng)成為了美國(guó)送餐服務(wù)領(lǐng)域最大的服務(wù)商,。上周,在新冠疫情引發(fā)的送餐熱潮中,公司成了上市新貴,。
在迎來(lái)了盛大的IPO之后,,DoorDash如今的估值約為500億美元,比一些成名已久的大型公司還要高,,例如通用磨坊,、卡夫亨氏以及福特。
然而,,DoorDash必須證明其疫情期間的增長(zhǎng)并非只是曇花一現(xiàn),。除了在最近的一個(gè)季度出現(xiàn)了短暫的盈利之外,公司多年來(lái)一直都在燒錢(qián),,2018年虧損了2.04億美元,,2019年虧損了6.67億美元,今年前9個(gè)月虧損了1.49億美元,。
AB Bernstein分析師馬克?施姆里克說(shuō):“投資者目前最大的疑問(wèn)在于,,當(dāng)前的增長(zhǎng)態(tài)勢(shì)能持續(xù)多久。送餐已經(jīng)成為日常生活的一部分,,但其可持續(xù)性如何,?”
周一,另一名分析師曾質(zhì)疑投資者在公司IPO之后對(duì)于公司過(guò)于樂(lè)觀,,DoorDash的股價(jià)在盤(pán)中應(yīng)聲下跌12%,,降至153美元。DoorDash重現(xiàn)了20年前互聯(lián)網(wǎng)泡沫的那段時(shí)光,,其股價(jià)在交易首日飆升了86%,。
DoorDash提到了多個(gè)能夠佐證其業(yè)務(wù)順?biāo)斓嫩E象。在多個(gè)城市經(jīng)營(yíng)數(shù)年之后,,公司能夠在這些城市盈利,,前提是刨掉某些成本。公司還提到已實(shí)現(xiàn)正現(xiàn)金流,,初創(chuàng)企業(yè)通常會(huì)拿這個(gè)指標(biāo)來(lái)展示自己所取得的進(jìn)步,當(dāng)然也得先扣除某些成本,。這意味著按照這種情況來(lái)看,,DoorDash在今年前9個(gè)月的進(jìn)賬要高于支出,這個(gè)業(yè)績(jī)受到了疫情的加速,,但并非源于疫情,。
不管從哪種情況來(lái)看,DoorDash都面臨著多重挑戰(zhàn),,其中包括可能導(dǎo)致雇員成本提升的法規(guī),;使用其服務(wù)的小商家破產(chǎn)導(dǎo)致客戶(hù)數(shù)量減少;以及與強(qiáng)大同行的競(jìng)爭(zhēng),包括UberEats,、Just Eat和Takeaway.com旗下Grubhub,。
最終,DoorDash并不希望僅僅止步于送餐服務(wù):公司打算讓自己成為幾乎所有主流街區(qū)店面購(gòu)物和送貨的常用應(yīng)用,。
獲得金主支持
DoorDash在早期奉行的理念是效率和節(jié)儉,,大都是不得已罷了,一開(kāi)始只有硅谷初創(chuàng)企業(yè)加速器Y Combinator向其提供了僅2萬(wàn)美元資金,。多年來(lái),,DoorDash一直在對(duì)其業(yè)務(wù)進(jìn)行完善,以降低成本,。
徐訊說(shuō):“從第一天開(kāi)始,,我們像鷹一樣一直緊盯著公司的盈利能力。我們一直在確保我們所打造的業(yè)務(wù)擁有通向盈利的路徑,?!?/p>
公司首席運(yùn)營(yíng)官克里斯托弗?佩妮說(shuō),DoorDash一開(kāi)始的擴(kuò)張可謂是郊區(qū)與城區(qū)并舉,,與此同時(shí),,傳統(tǒng)的理念認(rèn)為,送餐公司需要霸占人口密度高的大型城市,,因?yàn)樵谀抢?,大量的客?hù)都居住在離送餐公司不遠(yuǎn)的地方。然而,,在Cheesecake Factory請(qǐng)DoorDash為其全美開(kāi)設(shè)的餐廳提供服務(wù)之后,,DoorDash高管雙倍押注郊區(qū)業(yè)務(wù),盡管有人擔(dān)心公司難以在這些地區(qū)盈利,。
佩妮說(shuō):“當(dāng)時(shí)的情形是,,‘我們很快就會(huì)將其弄清楚’?;剡^(guò)頭來(lái)看,,我們似乎做出了明智的決策,因?yàn)槭聦?shí)證明,,DoorDash在郊區(qū)的效益與都市環(huán)境相差無(wú)幾,,或者更高?!?/p>
通過(guò)專(zhuān)注于郊區(qū),,DoorDash的服務(wù)延伸至更多的家庭,而這些家庭在每個(gè)訂單中又購(gòu)買(mǎi)了更多的食物,。盡管司機(jī)的路途有所增加,,但他們抵達(dá)目的地和停車(chē)的速度會(huì)更快,。
投行D.A. Davidson分析師湯姆?懷特說(shuō):“展望未來(lái),這是市場(chǎng)所有增長(zhǎng)的動(dòng)力源,?!?/p>
郊區(qū)戰(zhàn)略幫助釣來(lái)了硅谷風(fēng)投公司紅杉資本,后者于2014年領(lǐng)投了1730萬(wàn)美元的資金,。公司吸引到的另一個(gè)人就是徐訊,。
紅杉資本的合伙人阿爾弗萊德?林一開(kāi)始并沒(méi)有看好DoorDash,因?yàn)檫@個(gè)領(lǐng)域此前曾被投資者認(rèn)為是超級(jí)資本密集型行業(yè),。然而,,阿爾弗萊德?林最終于2014年同意注資DoorDash,在此之前,,林在紅杉資本贊助的晚宴上與徐訊進(jìn)行了交流,。徐訊是華裔移民,他從小到大一直在餐廳刷盤(pán)子,,他母親也是這個(gè)餐廳的雇員,。徐訊向林具體剖析了餐廳的業(yè)務(wù),甚至連餐廳如何計(jì)算餐飲的送餐時(shí)間都進(jìn)行了解釋,。然后,,徐訊將餐廳的效率與DoorDash進(jìn)行了對(duì)比,并從林那里拿到了這筆投資,。
林說(shuō):“他可能是唯一一個(gè)向我解釋其中數(shù)學(xué)問(wèn)題的人,。他的介紹改變了我的想法?!?/p>
公司的首席人力官薩拉?瓦格納說(shuō),徐訊對(duì)于效率的癡迷最終匯聚成了Doordash的企業(yè)文化,。其理念是專(zhuān)注于業(yè)務(wù)需要改善的領(lǐng)域,,迫使雇員不停地尋找他們可以解決的問(wèn)題。她說(shuō):“這種理念我還是頭一次見(jiàn)到,?!?/p>
一夜之間的轉(zhuǎn)變
在經(jīng)歷了快速增長(zhǎng)之后,,DoorDash開(kāi)始將目光瞄向了在2019年初 IPO,。今年三月,,在DoorDash信心滿(mǎn)滿(mǎn)地提交了IPO申請(qǐng)之后,,一件超乎想象的事情發(fā)生了:新冠病毒開(kāi)始在全球蔓延,。
隨著病毒的傳播,餐廳因城市整體關(guān)停而舉步維艱,,其中的一些餐廳僅能夠提供外賣(mài)和送餐。很多餐廳迅速與DoorDash這樣的第三方送餐服務(wù)商簽訂了協(xié)議,。
瓦格納說(shuō):“數(shù)以萬(wàn)計(jì)的商戶(hù)在短時(shí)間內(nèi)發(fā)布的通告中了解到,,它們必須從店內(nèi)用餐轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)樗筒秃腿〔湍J健P煊?、管理團(tuán)隊(duì)和公司的數(shù)千名雇員耗費(fèi)了數(shù)個(gè)夜晚,、周末及其空余時(shí)間……將這些商戶(hù)攬入平臺(tái)?!?/p>
為了應(yīng)對(duì)新冠病毒,,DoorDash臨時(shí)取消了新餐廳加入該服務(wù)的注冊(cè)費(fèi)用,并為店面數(shù)不超過(guò)5家的當(dāng)?shù)夭蛷d提供服務(wù)費(fèi)五折優(yōu)惠,。公司還花費(fèi)1.2億美元為司機(jī)購(gòu)買(mǎi)了口罩,、手套和洗手液,并取消了對(duì)餐廳的收費(fèi),,同時(shí)提供了無(wú)接觸送餐選項(xiàng),。在選擇這一服務(wù)后,司機(jī)會(huì)將餐食放在家門(mén)口,,以避免與消費(fèi)者近距離接觸,。
維克多和達(dá)娜?庫(kù)克西夫婦是芝加哥燒烤餐廳Krazy Hog的店主,,對(duì)他們來(lái)說(shuō),,DoorDash就是救世主,。Krazy Hog在疫情開(kāi)始肆虐之后便關(guān)閉了門(mén)店。然而數(shù)周之后,,在DoorDash的指引下,,餐廳搬到了由第三方運(yùn)營(yíng)商所有的共享廚房,僅提供取餐和送餐服務(wù),。DoorDash還通過(guò)公司所搜集的數(shù)據(jù),,例如客戶(hù)年齡分布和下單頻率,來(lái)幫助餐廳吸引更多的客戶(hù),。同時(shí),,DoorDash還將Krazy Hog的燒烤醬納入了公司于今年早些時(shí)候推出的數(shù)字便利店。
達(dá)娜?庫(kù)克西說(shuō):“當(dāng)他們告訴我們這一切時(shí)……你知道那個(gè)無(wú)比興奮的表情符號(hào)嗎,?我們就露出了這種表情?!彼f(shuō)自己當(dāng)時(shí)興奮到了極點(diǎn),。
維克多補(bǔ)充說(shuō):“在我看來(lái),,送餐服務(wù)已經(jīng)發(fā)生了徹底的變化,。”
但并非所有人都對(duì)DoorDash深信不疑,。例如,,Olive Garden與Yard House連鎖店母公司Darden Restaurants對(duì)于第三方送餐服務(wù)的銷(xiāo)售和質(zhì)量普遍感到不滿(mǎn),。Darden表示,公司依然認(rèn)同首席執(zhí)行官兩年前有關(guān)送餐的聲明:“在我們看來(lái),,有鑒于當(dāng)前的操作方式,,這并非是我們現(xiàn)如今希望參與的業(yè)務(wù),?!?/p>
一些餐廳起訴DoorDash在沒(méi)有獲得許可的情況下便將其列為服務(wù)對(duì)象,。例如,芝加哥Burger Antics在2018年起訴DoorDash,,稱(chēng)客戶(hù)在經(jīng)歷了長(zhǎng)時(shí)間等待之后收到了由司機(jī)送來(lái)的冰冷餐食。In-N-Out Burger在2015年也曾起訴過(guò)DoorDash,。
DoorDash希望通過(guò)列出那些所謂的“非合作方”餐廳,,向其證明自己的服務(wù)可以提升餐廳業(yè)務(wù),從而將這些餐廳轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)榭蛻?hù),。DoorDash稱(chēng),,公司在11月叫停了這類(lèi)做法,。
頻遭審查
DoorDash也遭到過(guò)不少審查。
一些餐廳抱怨,,像DoorDash這樣的送餐服務(wù)收取的服務(wù)費(fèi)過(guò)高,會(huì)削減餐廳的利潤(rùn),。分析師稱(chēng),,這筆費(fèi)用為訂單額的15-20%。這類(lèi)抱怨吸引了廣泛的注意力,,以至于全美各大城市開(kāi)始出臺(tái)送餐服務(wù)費(fèi)上限政策,,而其中大多數(shù)上限在疫情開(kāi)始后有所上調(diào)。
AB Bernstein的施姆里克說(shuō):“我們并不知道這些上限是永久性的還是臨時(shí)的,。是因?yàn)橐咔榈脑?,還是說(shuō)它將成為永久性的服務(wù)費(fèi)限制規(guī)定?”
多個(gè)州的監(jiān)管方已經(jīng)將目標(biāo)瞄準(zhǔn)了DoorDash及其零工公司,,監(jiān)管方認(rèn)為司機(jī)應(yīng)被劃分為雇員而不是得不到福利的獨(dú)立承包商。加州在這件事上一馬當(dāng)先,出臺(tái)了一部新法,,要求公司將其司機(jī)重新劃分為雇員。然而,,在選民11月投票通過(guò)一個(gè)名為Proposition 22提案,允許零工工作者保持其獨(dú)立承包商的身份,同時(shí)能夠拿到一些額外福利,,例如最低時(shí)薪和醫(yī)療保險(xiǎn),。
這一主張得到了DoorDash的資助,,徐訊對(duì)Prop 22提案的通過(guò)表示了贊賞,,他說(shuō)自己希望公司在這一方面發(fā)揮引領(lǐng)作用,,為其他州的司機(jī)尋找類(lèi)似的解決方案,。徐訊最近在《商業(yè)內(nèi)幕》的一篇專(zhuān)欄報(bào)道中寫(xiě)道:“我們要站在加州的肩膀上,,在其他地方尋找創(chuàng)新的解決方案?!?/p>
盡管其他州依然在考慮這個(gè)方案,D.A. Davidson的懷特說(shuō):“司機(jī)的劃分將依然是個(gè)難題,?!盌oorDash曾稱(chēng),公司在其他地區(qū)實(shí)施Prop 22之后亦能存活,,但到目前為止,公司的工作大多忙于計(jì)算假定的業(yè)績(jī)和成本。任何由州和聯(lián)邦監(jiān)管者做出的不利決策都有可能推遲DoorDash在未來(lái)幾年實(shí)現(xiàn)盈利的計(jì)劃。
2019年,,DoorDash收到了客戶(hù)對(duì)一項(xiàng)小費(fèi)政策的抗議,,該政策似乎能夠讓DoorDash獲取本應(yīng)給司機(jī)的小費(fèi)。迫于壓力,,DoorDash撤銷(xiāo)了這項(xiàng)政策,,公司稱(chēng)實(shí)施該政策的初衷是為了提升司機(jī)收入,。
除了應(yīng)對(duì)批評(píng)之外,DoorDash還必須應(yīng)付競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手,。公司的主要競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手UberEats給出了第三季度營(yíng)收(14.5億美元)增長(zhǎng)125%的財(cái)務(wù)業(yè)績(jī),。作為對(duì)比,,DoorDash同一季度的營(yíng)收為8.79億美元,,增幅達(dá)到了268%,。
隨著DoorDash向國(guó)際擴(kuò)張(已在澳大利亞和加拿大設(shè)立業(yè)務(wù)),公司面臨的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手越來(lái)越多,,包括英國(guó)的Just Eat和Deliveroo,。UberEats還通過(guò)以26.5億美元收購(gòu)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手Postmates,以及成為拉美百貨送貨初創(chuàng)企業(yè)Cornershop大股東,,拓展了其業(yè)務(wù)覆蓋范圍。
隨著DoorDash進(jìn)軍百貨送貨以及便利店等其他領(lǐng)域,,競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手名單則變得越來(lái)越長(zhǎng),。結(jié)果,,公司可能會(huì)面臨來(lái)自于百貨專(zhuān)營(yíng)巨頭Instacart和塔吉特旗下Shipt的競(jìng)爭(zhēng),,甚至是電商巨頭亞馬遜。
有利于DoorDash的一點(diǎn)在于,公司的服務(wù)已經(jīng)吸引了超過(guò)1800萬(wàn)用戶(hù)以及超過(guò)39萬(wàn)家商戶(hù)。施姆里克說(shuō):“公司在今后丟失市場(chǎng)份額的可能性不大,,但唯一的問(wèn)題在于,,DoorDash是否能滲透至上述其他領(lǐng)域,,還是會(huì)拱手將這些市場(chǎng)份額讓給他人,。”
盡管面臨著增長(zhǎng)和不斷增長(zhǎng)的挑戰(zhàn),,徐訊說(shuō)自己的關(guān)注點(diǎn)依然是餐廳,、用餐的人和業(yè)務(wù),而IPO只不過(guò)是錦上添花罷了,。
他說(shuō):“當(dāng)我們創(chuàng)建這家公司時(shí),,我并沒(méi)有想到要進(jìn)行IPO。我想的是,,‘除了我用自己的本田車(chē)運(yùn)送鷹嘴豆之外,,如何才能確保今晚有足夠的猛沖者(公司為其送餐工作人員起的外號(hào))前往送餐’,當(dāng)時(shí)的情形有點(diǎn)讓人難以置信,?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))
澄清:本文對(duì)原文進(jìn)行了更新,以提供更多有關(guān)DoorDash在疫情期間的開(kāi)支詳情,。
譯者:馮豐
審校:夏林
在斯坦福大學(xué)外的街邊,,一套被當(dāng)作辦公室的兩臥室公寓塞滿(mǎn)了20名年輕的技術(shù)人員。公寓內(nèi)的家具都是便宜貨,,包括一張唇膏紅的沙發(fā),、不匹配的桌子和折疊椅。
這家公司專(zhuān)注于為餐廳提供送餐服務(wù),,但僅為公寓周邊的8家餐廳提供服務(wù),。公司的雇員,不管從事什么工作,,都會(huì)在一天當(dāng)中抽出一些時(shí)間去送餐,,目的是為了了解如何改善這一業(yè)務(wù),,哪怕只是將訂單送達(dá)時(shí)間縮短幾秒鐘,。
送餐初創(chuàng)公司DoorDash首席執(zhí)行官徐訊說(shuō):“公司所有人都會(huì)去送餐,與所擔(dān)任的職務(wù)無(wú)關(guān),?!蹦莻€(gè)時(shí)候,這樣做的目的就是想“努力讓員工盡早地成為這方面的專(zhuān)家,?!?/p>
7年后,,DoorDash已經(jīng)成為了美國(guó)送餐服務(wù)領(lǐng)域最大的服務(wù)商。上周,,在新冠疫情引發(fā)的送餐熱潮中,,公司成了上市新貴。
在迎來(lái)了盛大的IPO之后,,DoorDash如今的估值約為500億美元,,比一些成名已久的大型公司還要高,例如通用磨坊,、卡夫亨氏以及福特,。
然而,DoorDash必須證明其疫情期間的增長(zhǎng)并非只是曇花一現(xiàn),。除了在最近的一個(gè)季度出現(xiàn)了短暫的盈利之外,,公司多年來(lái)一直都在燒錢(qián),2018年虧損了2.04億美元,,2019年虧損了6.67億美元,,今年前9個(gè)月虧損了1.49億美元。
AB Bernstein分析師馬克?施姆里克說(shuō):“投資者目前最大的疑問(wèn)在于,,當(dāng)前的增長(zhǎng)態(tài)勢(shì)能持續(xù)多久,。送餐已經(jīng)成為日常生活的一部分,但其可持續(xù)性如何,?”
周一,,另一名分析師曾質(zhì)疑投資者在公司IPO之后對(duì)于公司過(guò)于樂(lè)觀,DoorDash的股價(jià)在盤(pán)中應(yīng)聲下跌12%,,降至153美元,。DoorDash重現(xiàn)了20年前互聯(lián)網(wǎng)泡沫的那段時(shí)光,其股價(jià)在交易首日飆升了86%,。
DoorDash提到了多個(gè)能夠佐證其業(yè)務(wù)順?biāo)斓嫩E象,。在多個(gè)城市經(jīng)營(yíng)數(shù)年之后,公司能夠在這些城市盈利,,前提是刨掉某些成本,。公司還提到已實(shí)現(xiàn)正現(xiàn)金流,初創(chuàng)企業(yè)通常會(huì)拿這個(gè)指標(biāo)來(lái)展示自己所取得的進(jìn)步,,當(dāng)然也得先扣除某些成本,。這意味著按照這種情況來(lái)看,DoorDash在今年前9個(gè)月的進(jìn)賬要高于支出,,這個(gè)業(yè)績(jī)受到了疫情的加速,,但并非源于疫情。
不管從哪種情況來(lái)看,,DoorDash都面臨著多重挑戰(zhàn),,其中包括可能導(dǎo)致雇員成本提升的法規(guī),;使用其服務(wù)的小商家破產(chǎn)導(dǎo)致客戶(hù)數(shù)量減少;以及與強(qiáng)大同行的競(jìng)爭(zhēng),,包括UberEats,、Just Eat和Takeaway.com旗下Grubhub。
最終,,DoorDash并不希望僅僅止步于送餐服務(wù):公司打算讓自己成為幾乎所有主流街區(qū)店面購(gòu)物和送貨的常用應(yīng)用,。
獲得金主支持
DoorDash在早期奉行的理念是效率和節(jié)儉,大都是不得已罷了,,一開(kāi)始只有硅谷初創(chuàng)企業(yè)加速器Y Combinator向其提供了僅2萬(wàn)美元資金,。多年來(lái),DoorDash一直在對(duì)其業(yè)務(wù)進(jìn)行完善,,以降低成本,。
徐訊說(shuō):“從第一天開(kāi)始,我們像鷹一樣一直緊盯著公司的盈利能力,。我們一直在確保我們所打造的業(yè)務(wù)擁有通向盈利的路徑,。”
公司首席運(yùn)營(yíng)官克里斯托弗?佩妮說(shuō),,DoorDash一開(kāi)始的擴(kuò)張可謂是郊區(qū)與城區(qū)并舉,,與此同時(shí),傳統(tǒng)的理念認(rèn)為,,送餐公司需要霸占人口密度高的大型城市,,因?yàn)樵谀抢铮罅康目蛻?hù)都居住在離送餐公司不遠(yuǎn)的地方,。然而,,在Cheesecake Factory請(qǐng)DoorDash為其全美開(kāi)設(shè)的餐廳提供服務(wù)之后,DoorDash高管雙倍押注郊區(qū)業(yè)務(wù),,盡管有人擔(dān)心公司難以在這些地區(qū)盈利,。
佩妮說(shuō):“當(dāng)時(shí)的情形是,‘我們很快就會(huì)將其弄清楚’,?;剡^(guò)頭來(lái)看,我們似乎做出了明智的決策,,因?yàn)槭聦?shí)證明,,DoorDash在郊區(qū)的效益與都市環(huán)境相差無(wú)幾,或者更高,?!?/p>
通過(guò)專(zhuān)注于郊區(qū),,DoorDash的服務(wù)延伸至更多的家庭,,而這些家庭在每個(gè)訂單中又購(gòu)買(mǎi)了更多的食物,。盡管司機(jī)的路途有所增加,但他們抵達(dá)目的地和停車(chē)的速度會(huì)更快,。
投行D.A. Davidson分析師湯姆?懷特說(shuō):“展望未來(lái),,這是市場(chǎng)所有增長(zhǎng)的動(dòng)力源?!?/p>
郊區(qū)戰(zhàn)略幫助釣來(lái)了硅谷風(fēng)投公司紅杉資本,,后者于2014年領(lǐng)投了1730萬(wàn)美元的資金。公司吸引到的另一個(gè)人就是徐訊,。
紅杉資本的合伙人阿爾弗萊德?林一開(kāi)始并沒(méi)有看好DoorDash,,因?yàn)檫@個(gè)領(lǐng)域此前曾被投資者認(rèn)為是超級(jí)資本密集型行業(yè)。然而,,阿爾弗萊德?林最終于2014年同意注資DoorDash,,在此之前,林在紅杉資本贊助的晚宴上與徐訊進(jìn)行了交流,。徐訊是華裔移民,,他從小到大一直在餐廳刷盤(pán)子,他母親也是這個(gè)餐廳的雇員,。徐訊向林具體剖析了餐廳的業(yè)務(wù),,甚至連餐廳如何計(jì)算餐飲的送餐時(shí)間都進(jìn)行了解釋。然后,,徐訊將餐廳的效率與DoorDash進(jìn)行了對(duì)比,,并從林那里拿到了這筆投資。
林說(shuō):“他可能是唯一一個(gè)向我解釋其中數(shù)學(xué)問(wèn)題的人,。他的介紹改變了我的想法,。”
公司的首席人力官薩拉?瓦格納說(shuō),,徐訊對(duì)于效率的癡迷最終匯聚成了Doordash的企業(yè)文化,。其理念是專(zhuān)注于業(yè)務(wù)需要改善的領(lǐng)域,迫使雇員不停地尋找他們可以解決的問(wèn)題,。她說(shuō):“這種理念我還是頭一次見(jiàn)到,。”
一夜之間的轉(zhuǎn)變
在經(jīng)歷了快速增長(zhǎng)之后,,DoorDash開(kāi)始將目光瞄向了在2019年初 IPO,。今年三月,在DoorDash信心滿(mǎn)滿(mǎn)地提交了IPO申請(qǐng)之后,,一件超乎想象的事情發(fā)生了:新冠病毒開(kāi)始在全球蔓延,。
隨著病毒的傳播,餐廳因城市整體關(guān)停而舉步維艱,其中的一些餐廳僅能夠提供外賣(mài)和送餐,。很多餐廳迅速與DoorDash這樣的第三方送餐服務(wù)商簽訂了協(xié)議,。
瓦格納說(shuō):“數(shù)以萬(wàn)計(jì)的商戶(hù)在短時(shí)間內(nèi)發(fā)布的通告中了解到,它們必須從店內(nèi)用餐轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)樗筒秃腿〔湍J?。徐訊,、管理團(tuán)隊(duì)和公司的數(shù)千名雇員耗費(fèi)了數(shù)個(gè)夜晚、周末及其空余時(shí)間……將這些商戶(hù)攬入平臺(tái),?!?/p>
為了應(yīng)對(duì)新冠病毒,DoorDash臨時(shí)取消了新餐廳加入該服務(wù)的注冊(cè)費(fèi)用,,并為店面數(shù)不超過(guò)5家的當(dāng)?shù)夭蛷d提供服務(wù)費(fèi)五折優(yōu)惠,。公司還花費(fèi)1.2億美元為司機(jī)購(gòu)買(mǎi)了口罩、手套和洗手液,,并取消了對(duì)餐廳的收費(fèi),,同時(shí)提供了無(wú)接觸送餐選項(xiàng)。在選擇這一服務(wù)后,,司機(jī)會(huì)將餐食放在家門(mén)口,,以避免與消費(fèi)者近距離接觸。
維克多和達(dá)娜?庫(kù)克西夫婦是芝加哥燒烤餐廳Krazy Hog的店主,,對(duì)他們來(lái)說(shuō),,DoorDash就是救世主。Krazy Hog在疫情開(kāi)始肆虐之后便關(guān)閉了門(mén)店,。然而數(shù)周之后,,在DoorDash的指引下,餐廳搬到了由第三方運(yùn)營(yíng)商所有的共享廚房,,僅提供取餐和送餐服務(wù),。DoorDash還通過(guò)公司所搜集的數(shù)據(jù),例如客戶(hù)年齡分布和下單頻率,,來(lái)幫助餐廳吸引更多的客戶(hù),。同時(shí),DoorDash還將Krazy Hog的燒烤醬納入了公司于今年早些時(shí)候推出的數(shù)字便利店,。
達(dá)娜?庫(kù)克西說(shuō):“當(dāng)他們告訴我們這一切時(shí)……你知道那個(gè)無(wú)比興奮的表情符號(hào)嗎,?我們就露出了這種表情?!彼f(shuō)自己當(dāng)時(shí)興奮到了極點(diǎn),。
維克多補(bǔ)充說(shuō):“在我看來(lái),送餐服務(wù)已經(jīng)發(fā)生了徹底的變化,?!?/p>
但并非所有人都對(duì)DoorDash深信不疑。例如,Olive Garden與Yard House連鎖店母公司Darden Restaurants對(duì)于第三方送餐服務(wù)的銷(xiāo)售和質(zhì)量普遍感到不滿(mǎn),。Darden表示,,公司依然認(rèn)同首席執(zhí)行官兩年前有關(guān)送餐的聲明:“在我們看來(lái),有鑒于當(dāng)前的操作方式,,這并非是我們現(xiàn)如今希望參與的業(yè)務(wù),?!?/p>
一些餐廳起訴DoorDash在沒(méi)有獲得許可的情況下便將其列為服務(wù)對(duì)象,。例如,芝加哥Burger Antics在2018年起訴DoorDash,,稱(chēng)客戶(hù)在經(jīng)歷了長(zhǎng)時(shí)間等待之后收到了由司機(jī)送來(lái)的冰冷餐食,。In-N-Out Burger在2015年也曾起訴過(guò)DoorDash。
DoorDash希望通過(guò)列出那些所謂的“非合作方”餐廳,,向其證明自己的服務(wù)可以提升餐廳業(yè)務(wù),,從而將這些餐廳轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)榭蛻?hù)。DoorDash稱(chēng),,公司在11月叫停了這類(lèi)做法,。
頻遭審查
DoorDash也遭到過(guò)不少審查。
一些餐廳抱怨,,像DoorDash這樣的送餐服務(wù)收取的服務(wù)費(fèi)過(guò)高,,會(huì)削減餐廳的利潤(rùn)。分析師稱(chēng),,這筆費(fèi)用為訂單額的15-20%,。這類(lèi)抱怨吸引了廣泛的注意力,以至于全美各大城市開(kāi)始出臺(tái)送餐服務(wù)費(fèi)上限政策,,而其中大多數(shù)上限在疫情開(kāi)始后有所上調(diào),。
AB Bernstein的施姆里克說(shuō):“我們并不知道這些上限是永久性的還是臨時(shí)的。是因?yàn)橐咔榈脑?,還是說(shuō)它將成為永久性的服務(wù)費(fèi)限制規(guī)定,?”
多個(gè)州的監(jiān)管方已經(jīng)將目標(biāo)瞄準(zhǔn)了DoorDash及其零工公司,監(jiān)管方認(rèn)為司機(jī)應(yīng)被劃分為雇員而不是得不到福利的獨(dú)立承包商,。加州在這件事上一馬當(dāng)先,,出臺(tái)了一部新法,要求公司將其司機(jī)重新劃分為雇員,。然而,,在選民11月投票通過(guò)一個(gè)名為Proposition 22提案,允許零工工作者保持其獨(dú)立承包商的身份,,同時(shí)能夠拿到一些額外福利,,例如最低時(shí)薪和醫(yī)療保險(xiǎn)。
這一主張得到了DoorDash的資助,徐訊對(duì)Prop 22提案的通過(guò)表示了贊賞,,他說(shuō)自己希望公司在這一方面發(fā)揮引領(lǐng)作用,,為其他州的司機(jī)尋找類(lèi)似的解決方案。徐訊最近在《商業(yè)內(nèi)幕》的一篇專(zhuān)欄報(bào)道中寫(xiě)道:“我們要站在加州的肩膀上,,在其他地方尋找創(chuàng)新的解決方案,。”
盡管其他州依然在考慮這個(gè)方案,,D.A. Davidson的懷特說(shuō):“司機(jī)的劃分將依然是個(gè)難題,。”DoorDash曾稱(chēng),,公司在其他地區(qū)實(shí)施Prop 22之后亦能存活,,但到目前為止,公司的工作大多忙于計(jì)算假定的業(yè)績(jī)和成本,。任何由州和聯(lián)邦監(jiān)管者做出的不利決策都有可能推遲DoorDash在未來(lái)幾年實(shí)現(xiàn)盈利的計(jì)劃,。
2019年,DoorDash收到了客戶(hù)對(duì)一項(xiàng)小費(fèi)政策的抗議,,該政策似乎能夠讓DoorDash獲取本應(yīng)給司機(jī)的小費(fèi),。迫于壓力,DoorDash撤銷(xiāo)了這項(xiàng)政策,,公司稱(chēng)實(shí)施該政策的初衷是為了提升司機(jī)收入,。
除了應(yīng)對(duì)批評(píng)之外,DoorDash還必須應(yīng)付競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手,。公司的主要競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手UberEats給出了第三季度營(yíng)收(14.5億美元)增長(zhǎng)125%的財(cái)務(wù)業(yè)績(jī),。作為對(duì)比,DoorDash同一季度的營(yíng)收為8.79億美元,,增幅達(dá)到了268%,。
隨著DoorDash向國(guó)際擴(kuò)張(已在澳大利亞和加拿大設(shè)立業(yè)務(wù)),公司面臨的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手越來(lái)越多,,包括英國(guó)的Just Eat和Deliveroo,。UberEats還通過(guò)以26.5億美元收購(gòu)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手Postmates,以及成為拉美百貨送貨初創(chuàng)企業(yè)Cornershop大股東,,拓展了其業(yè)務(wù)覆蓋范圍,。
隨著DoorDash進(jìn)軍百貨送貨以及便利店等其他領(lǐng)域,競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手名單則變得越來(lái)越長(zhǎng),。結(jié)果,,公司可能會(huì)面臨來(lái)自于百貨專(zhuān)營(yíng)巨頭Instacart和塔吉特旗下Shipt的競(jìng)爭(zhēng),甚至是電商巨頭亞馬遜,。
有利于DoorDash的一點(diǎn)在于,,公司的服務(wù)已經(jīng)吸引了超過(guò)1800萬(wàn)用戶(hù)以及超過(guò)39萬(wàn)家商戶(hù),。施姆里克說(shuō):“公司在今后丟失市場(chǎng)份額的可能性不大,但唯一的問(wèn)題在于,,DoorDash是否能滲透至上述其他領(lǐng)域,,還是會(huì)拱手將這些市場(chǎng)份額讓給他人?!?/p>
盡管面臨著增長(zhǎng)和不斷增長(zhǎng)的挑戰(zhàn),,徐訊說(shuō)自己的關(guān)注點(diǎn)依然是餐廳、用餐的人和業(yè)務(wù),,而IPO只不過(guò)是錦上添花罷了,。
他說(shuō):“當(dāng)我們創(chuàng)建這家公司時(shí),我并沒(méi)有想到要進(jìn)行IPO,。我想的是,,‘除了我用自己的本田車(chē)運(yùn)送鷹嘴豆之外,,如何才能確保今晚有足夠的猛沖者(公司為其送餐工作人員起的外號(hào))前往送餐’,,當(dāng)時(shí)的情形有點(diǎn)讓人難以置信?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))
澄清:本文對(duì)原文進(jìn)行了更新,,以提供更多有關(guān)DoorDash在疫情期間的開(kāi)支詳情。
譯者:馮豐
審校:夏林
Down the street from Stanford University, 20 young techies crammed into a two-bedroom apartment that served as their office. Their furniture, bought on the cheap, included a lipstick-red couch, mismatched tables, and folding chairs.
The company was focused on providing food delivery for restaurants—in this case just eight in the neighborhood. Employees, no matter their job, spent part of their day shuttling food to front porches, in an effort to learn how to improve the business, even if it meant shaving only a few seconds off the time it took to get orders to their destinations.
“Everyone in the company did deliveries—it didn’t matter what you were,” said Tony Xu, CEO of the delivery upstart, DoorDash. Back then, it was about “trying to become an expert early on.”
Seven years later, DoorDash has become the biggest player in U.S. food delivery. And last week, amid a food delivery boom fueled by the coronavirus pandemic, it became a newly minted public company.
Following a blockbuster IPO, DoorDash is now valued at around $50 billion. That’s more than big established companies like General Mills, Kraft Heinz, and Ford.
Still, DoorDash must prove that its growth during the pandemic was no fluke. Other than a profitable blip in one recent quarter, it has hemorrhaged money for years, losing $204 million in 2018, $667 million in 2019, and, in the first nine months of this year, $149 million.
“The biggest questions investors have is how durable the current growth levels are,” said Mark Shmulik, an analyst at AB Bernstein. “Food delivery has become a part of normal life, but at what sustainable level?”
On Monday, DoorDash’s shares slid 12% to $153 in midday trading after another analyst questioned whether investors had been too optimistic following the company’s IPO. In a reprise of the dotcom boom days of 20 years ago, DoorDash’s shares had soared 86% on their first day of trading.
DoorDash points to a couple of signs that suggest its business is sound. After operating in certain cities for several years, it’s able to make a profit in them, excluding certain costs. The company also points to being cash flow positive, a metric often touted by startups to show progress that also excludes certain costs. It means that the company, in this case, over the first nine months of this year, had more cash coming in than going out, a result that was accelerated, but not created, by the pandemic.
Whatever the case, DoorDash faces a number of challenges. Those include regulation that could increase employee costs; the demise of mom-and-pop restaurants, which is reducing the number of merchants using its service; and competition with well-funded rivals including UberEats and Just Eat Takeaway.com–owned Grubhub.
At the end of the day, DoorDash wants to deliver more than just food: It wants to be the go-to app for shopping and delivery from nearly all Main Street stores.
Getting buy-in
DoorDash’s early days were driven by efficiency and frugality—mostly out of necessity. Starting with just $20,000 from Silicon Valley startup accelerator Y Combinator in 2013, DoorDash has spent years tinkering with its operations to lower costs.
“We watched profitability like a hawk from day one because we had to,” Xu said. “We always made sure we built a business that had a path to profitability.”
Initially, DoorDash expanded in urban markets in addition to suburban ones, said Christopher Payne, the company’s chief operating officer. At the time, the conventional wisdom was that delivery companies needed to dominate big, dense cities, where lots of customers live within short distances, to be successful. But after the Cheesecake Factory asked DoorDash to serve its restaurants nationwide, DoorDash executives doubled down on the suburbs despite concerns about making those areas profitable.
“We were like, ‘We’re just going to figure it out,’” Payne said. “In hindsight, it looks like we were brilliant because it turns out that DoorDash works as well or better in suburbs as it does in urban environments.”
By focusing on the suburbs, DoorDash reached more families, who in turn bought more food per order. Though drivers traveled farther, they often reached their destinations and parked faster.
“Fast-forward, and those are the markets all growth is coming from,” said Tom White, an analyst at investment bank D.A. Davidson.
The suburban strategy was partially what helped lure big Silicon Valley venture capital firm Sequoia Capital, which led a $17.3 million funding round in DoorDash in 2014. The other attraction was Xu.
After initially passing on DoorDash—the category was once viewed as too capital intensive by investors—Sequoia partner Alfred Lin was finally sold in 2014 after speaking with Xu at a Sequoia-sponsored networking dinner. Xu, a Chinese immigrant who grew up washing dishes in a restaurant that also employed his mother, dissected the restaurant’s operations for Lin, even going so far as to explain how the restaurant timed the delivery of its food. Xu then tied the efficiency of the restaurant to that of DoorDash, sealing the deal for Lin.
“He was probably the only person to talk to me about the math of it all,” Lin said. “It changed my mind.”
Xu’s obsession with efficiency eventually trickled down into what has become the culture at DoorDash, said Sarah Wagener, the company’s chief people officer. The idea is to focus on areas where the business needs improvement, forcing employees to constantly look for problems they can solve. “It’s not like anything I’ve seen,” she said.
An overnight shift
Following rapid growth, DoorDash began eyeing an initial public offering in early 2019. Then in March, after filing for an IPO confidentially, the unimaginable happened: The coronavirus became a global pandemic.
As the virus spread, restaurants grappled with citywide shutdowns, some of which limited them to takeout and delivery. Many restaurants quickly signed up with third-party delivery services like DoorDash.
“Thousands and thousands of merchants were realizing in a moment’s notice they had to switch from a dine-in to delivery and pickup-only model,” Wagener said. “Tony, the management team, and thousands of employees across the company spent nights, weekends, their spare time…onboarding merchants onto the platform.”
To respond to the coronavirus, DoorDash temporarily waived sign-up fees for new restaurants joining the service and cut commission fees in half for local restaurants with five or fewer locations. It also spent $120 million on masks, gloves, and hand sanitizer for drivers plus the waiver of the fees it charges restaurants, and built a no-contact delivery option, in which drivers leave food on the doorstep to avoid close contact with consumers.
For Krazy Hog, a Chicago-based barbecue restaurant, DoorDash became vital. Owned by husband-and-wife duo Victor and Dana Cooksey, Krazy Hog shut its doors after the pandemic hit. But just weeks later, with guidance from DoorDash, the restaurant moved into a shared kitchen owned by a third-party operator and set up for pickup and delivery alone. DoorDash also helped the restaurant lure more customers through the use of the data it collects, such as customer demographics and ordering frequency, and is working to include Krazy Hog’s barbecue sauce in DoorDash’s digital convenience store that debuted earlier this year.
“When they told us about all this…You know the little emoji with the brains being blown out? It was that,” Dana Cooksey said, suggesting she was mind-blown.
“I view the delivery totally different now,” Victor added.
But not everyone is sold on DoorDash. For one, Darden Restaurants, the parent of the Olive Garden and Yard House chains, has been unimpressed by the sales and quality of third-party delivery services generally. Darden said it still stands by a statement its CEO, Gene Lee, made two years ago about delivery: “We just don’t see this as something that we want to get involved in today with the current way it’s being executed.”
Some restaurants have sued DoorDash for allegedly adding their eateries to the service without permission. For example, Chicago-based Burger Antics filed a lawsuit against DoorDash in 2018, saying that customers claimed they had received cold food from drivers after long waits. And In-N-Out Burger sued DoorDash in 2015.
By listing what the company calls “non-partner” restaurants, DoorDash hoped to convert those restaurants into customers by proving that its service increased their business. DoorDash said it stopped the practice in November.
No stranger to scrutiny
DoorDash has had its share of scrutiny.
Some restaurants have complained that food-delivery services like DoorDash hurt profits by charging excessive commissions, which analysts say amount to 15% to 20% per order. The complaint has received so much traction that cities nationwide have started implementing caps on delivery commission, most of which have been added since the pandemic started.
“We don’t know how permanent or temporary these caps are,” said Shmulik of AB Bernstein. “Is this just the pandemic, or is this going to be a permanent thing that is going limit them?”
Several state regulators have also targeted DoorDash and its fellow gig companies, arguing that drivers should be classified as employees rather than independent contractors who get no benefits. California has taken the lead on the matter, enacting a new law that would have required companies to reclassify their drivers as employees. But that law was nullified after voters approved a November ballot initiative called Proposition 22 that lets gig workers remain independent contractors while receiving a few additional benefits like a minimum hourly wage and medical coverage.
Xu touted the passage of the proposition, which DoorDash helped fund, and said he hopes that the company leads the effort on finding similar solutions for drivers in other states. “We need to build upon what began in California to find innovative solutions elsewhere,” Xu recently wrote in an op-ed for Business Insider.
Though other states are still considering their options, “driver classification is certainly going to remain an issue,” said White of D.A. Davidson. DoorDash has said it can survive the adoption of Prop 22–like laws elsewhere, but so far the company has mostly been working through hypothetical outcomes and costs. Any adverse decision by state or federal regulators may delay DoorDash’s plans to become profitable in upcoming years.
In 2019, DoorDash faced a customer revolt over a tipping policy that appeared to allow DoorDash to pocket tips that were meant for drivers. Under pressure, DoorDash reversed that policy, which it said was initially implemented to increase driver earnings.
Beyond criticism, DoorDash must fend off rivals. The company’s main one, UberEats, reported a 125% gain in third-quarter revenue to $1.45 billion. By comparison, DoorDash had $879 million in revenue during the same period, a gain of 268%.
As it expands internationally—DoorDash currently operates in Australia and Canada—it faces growing competition including from the U.K.’s Just Eat and Deliveroo. UberEats has also extended its reach through a $2.65 billion acquisition of rival Postmates and by taking a majority stake in Latin American grocery-delivery startup Cornershop.
As DoorDash expands into other categories like grocery delivery and convenience, the list of rivals is growing. As a result, it could face competition from grocery-focused giants Instacart and Target-owned Shipt, and even e-commerce behemoth Amazon.
Working in DoorDash’s favor is that it has already attracted more than 18 million users to its service and more than 390,000 merchants. “It’s hard to see how they lose share moving forward,” said Shmulik. “The only question is, can they penetrate these other categories or do they leave the door open for others to gain that share?”
Despite the growth and mounting challenges, Xu said his focus remains on restaurants, diners, and operations. And the IPO, well, that’s the icing on the cake.
“When we started the company, I wasn’t thinking about an IPO; I was thinking about, ‘How I am going to make sure we have enough Dashers on the road tonight, in addition to me schlepping hummus from my Honda,’” he said, using the company’s terms for its delivery workers. “It’s a bit of an incredulous moment.”
Clarification: This article was updated from the original to provide more detail about DoorDash’s spending during the pandemic.