亚色在线观看_亚洲人成a片高清在线观看不卡_亚洲中文无码亚洲人成频_免费在线黄片,69精品视频九九精品视频,美女大黄三级,人人干人人g,全新av网站每日更新播放,亚洲三及片,wwww无码视频,亚洲中文字幕无码一区在线

首頁(yè) 500強(qiáng) 活動(dòng) 榜單 商業(yè) 科技 商潮 專(zhuān)題 品牌中心
雜志訂閱

新冠疫情真的會(huì)帶來(lái)嬰兒潮嗎,?

Marie Solis
2021-03-09

隨著疫情持續(xù)的時(shí)間越來(lái)越長(zhǎng),我們或?qū)⒖吹礁鼑?yán)重的出生率下降情況,,永久性放棄生育計(jì)劃的人也將越來(lái)越多。

文本設(shè)置
小號(hào)
默認(rèn)
大號(hào)
Plus(0條)

布魯金斯學(xué)會(huì)(Brookings Institution)的研究人員近日表示,,一些人曾經(jīng)預(yù)計(jì)稱(chēng),,受新冠疫情影響,情侶居家隔離會(huì)帶來(lái)一波“嬰兒潮”,。而現(xiàn)實(shí)表明,,這一預(yù)測(cè)并未實(shí)現(xiàn)。

事實(shí)甚至與之相反,。馬里蘭大學(xué)(University of Maryland)和韋爾斯利學(xué)院(Wellesley College)的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)教授梅麗莎·卡尼和菲利普·萊文分別表示,,他們預(yù)計(jì)2021年的新生兒數(shù)量將減少30萬(wàn)人——他們稱(chēng)之為新冠“嬰兒退潮”。

全國(guó)失業(yè)率每上升1%,,出生率就會(huì)下降1%——他們的發(fā)現(xiàn)部分基于這一證據(jù),。為了解釋“公共衛(wèi)生危機(jī)在經(jīng)濟(jì)危機(jī)之上”這一事實(shí),卡尼和萊文調(diào)查了1918年西班牙流感對(duì)出生率的影響,,發(fā)現(xiàn)流感死亡人數(shù)的激增導(dǎo)致了9個(gè)月后出生人數(shù)的減少,。

影響可以從宏觀和微觀的角度分別分析?!瓣P(guān)于一國(guó)的出生率變化,事實(shí)已經(jīng)很清楚:當(dāng)勞動(dòng)力市場(chǎng)疲軟時(shí),,總出生率將下降,;當(dāng)勞動(dòng)力市場(chǎng)提振時(shí),出生率也會(huì)跟著上升,?!彼麄?cè)凇都~約時(shí)報(bào)》(New York Times)評(píng)論版寫(xiě)道,“在個(gè)人層面,,個(gè)人收入和出生率的聯(lián)系也相當(dāng)清晰:收入增加,,人們?cè)敢鈹U(kuò)大家庭成員;而收入減少或遭遇裁員時(shí),,他們的生育意愿會(huì)降低,?!?/p>

在疫情爆發(fā)幾個(gè)月后的2020年6月,卡尼和萊文就曾經(jīng)作出分析,。在布魯金斯學(xué)會(huì)的報(bào)告中他們寫(xiě)道:“風(fēng)暴和封鎖”之后的“嬰兒潮神話”,,僅僅是一個(gè)神話而已。當(dāng)月,,古特馬赫研究所(Guttmacher Institute)發(fā)布的報(bào)告也佐證了這一觀點(diǎn),。該報(bào)告詳細(xì)說(shuō)明了在疫情期間,婦女對(duì)計(jì)劃生育的看法發(fā)生了巨大變化,。

報(bào)告發(fā)現(xiàn),,超過(guò)40%的受訪女性表示將會(huì)調(diào)整生育計(jì)劃,比如何時(shí)生,、要幾個(gè)小孩等,。此外,超過(guò)三分之一的女性表示疫情使其推遲或減少生育,。僅有17%的女性表示疫情使其愿意更早生育或要更多的孩子,。

常識(shí)告訴我們,情況的確如此,。近幾個(gè)月來(lái),,女性的失業(yè)率達(dá)到了最高水平,尤其是母親們——由于學(xué)校停課和育兒工作的小差錯(cuò),,她們實(shí)際上已經(jīng)被擠出了勞動(dòng)力大軍,。

疫情對(duì)出生率的影響,只是美國(guó)生育系統(tǒng)痼疾中的一個(gè)痛點(diǎn),。多年來(lái),,美國(guó)的新生兒出生率一直在下降,社會(huì),、文化,、經(jīng)濟(jì)等諸多因素匯集,共同導(dǎo)致了人們生育意愿的滑坡,。在這些因素中,,政府支持的缺位占了大頭:在工業(yè)化國(guó)家中,美國(guó)仍然是唯一一個(gè)沒(méi)有實(shí)行普適性的帶薪家庭假政策的國(guó)家,。而在有助于提高生育意愿的兒童保育和學(xué)前教育政策方面,,美國(guó)政府也未能提出好政策。

卡尼和萊文表示,,出生率可能會(huì)反彈到疫情前的數(shù)字,,因?yàn)橐恍┤酥皇峭七t生育計(jì)劃,而不是決定不生,。但是隨著疫情持續(xù)時(shí)間越來(lái)越長(zhǎng),,產(chǎn)生的社會(huì)和經(jīng)濟(jì)影響也越來(lái)越深遠(yuǎn),,這一可能性將會(huì)越來(lái)越小,甚至產(chǎn)生嚴(yán)重的長(zhǎng)期后果,,例如造成未來(lái)勞動(dòng)力市場(chǎng)的萎縮,。

報(bào)告稱(chēng):“現(xiàn)在我們堅(jiān)持之前的預(yù)測(cè),即新冠疫情將導(dǎo)致嬰兒出生減少約30萬(wàn),。但疫情持續(xù)的時(shí)間越長(zhǎng),,經(jīng)濟(jì)和社會(huì)焦慮越深,我們或?qū)⒖吹礁鼑?yán)重的出生率下降情況,,永久性放棄生育計(jì)劃的人也將越來(lái)越多,。”(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))

編譯:楊二一

布魯金斯學(xué)會(huì)(Brookings Institution)的研究人員近日表示,,一些人曾經(jīng)預(yù)計(jì)稱(chēng),,受新冠疫情影響,情侶居家隔離會(huì)帶來(lái)一波“嬰兒潮”,。而現(xiàn)實(shí)表明,,這一預(yù)測(cè)并未實(shí)現(xiàn)。

事實(shí)甚至與之相反,。馬里蘭大學(xué)(University of Maryland)和韋爾斯利學(xué)院(Wellesley College)的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)教授梅麗莎·卡尼和菲利普·萊文分別表示,,他們預(yù)計(jì)2021年的新生兒數(shù)量將減少30萬(wàn)人——他們稱(chēng)之為新冠“嬰兒退潮”。

全國(guó)失業(yè)率每上升1%,,出生率就會(huì)下降1%——他們的發(fā)現(xiàn)部分基于這一證據(jù),。為了解釋“公共衛(wèi)生危機(jī)在經(jīng)濟(jì)危機(jī)之上”這一事實(shí),卡尼和萊文調(diào)查了1918年西班牙流感對(duì)出生率的影響,,發(fā)現(xiàn)流感死亡人數(shù)的激增導(dǎo)致了9個(gè)月后出生人數(shù)的減少,。

影響可以從宏觀和微觀的角度分別分析?!瓣P(guān)于一國(guó)的出生率變化,,事實(shí)已經(jīng)很清楚:當(dāng)勞動(dòng)力市場(chǎng)疲軟時(shí),總出生率將下降,;當(dāng)勞動(dòng)力市場(chǎng)提振時(shí),,出生率也會(huì)跟著上升?!彼麄?cè)凇都~約時(shí)報(bào)》(New York Times)評(píng)論版寫(xiě)道,“在個(gè)人層面,,個(gè)人收入和出生率的聯(lián)系也相當(dāng)清晰:收入增加,,人們?cè)敢鈹U(kuò)大家庭成員;而收入減少或遭遇裁員時(shí),,他們的生育意愿會(huì)降低,?!?/p>

在疫情爆發(fā)幾個(gè)月后的2020年6月,卡尼和萊文就曾經(jīng)作出分析,。在布魯金斯學(xué)會(huì)的報(bào)告中他們寫(xiě)道:“風(fēng)暴和封鎖”之后的“嬰兒潮神話”,,僅僅是一個(gè)神話而已。當(dāng)月,,古特馬赫研究所(Guttmacher Institute)發(fā)布的報(bào)告也佐證了這一觀點(diǎn),。該報(bào)告詳細(xì)說(shuō)明了在疫情期間,婦女對(duì)計(jì)劃生育的看法發(fā)生了巨大變化,。

報(bào)告發(fā)現(xiàn),,超過(guò)40%的受訪女性表示將會(huì)調(diào)整生育計(jì)劃,比如何時(shí)生,、要幾個(gè)小孩等,。此外,超過(guò)三分之一的女性表示疫情使其推遲或減少生育,。僅有17%的女性表示疫情使其愿意更早生育或要更多的孩子,。

常識(shí)告訴我們,情況的確如此,。近幾個(gè)月來(lái),,女性的失業(yè)率達(dá)到了最高水平,尤其是母親們——由于學(xué)校停課和育兒工作的小差錯(cuò),,她們實(shí)際上已經(jīng)被擠出了勞動(dòng)力大軍,。

疫情對(duì)出生率的影響,只是美國(guó)生育系統(tǒng)痼疾中的一個(gè)痛點(diǎn),。多年來(lái),,美國(guó)的新生兒出生率一直在下降,社會(huì),、文化,、經(jīng)濟(jì)等諸多因素匯集,共同導(dǎo)致了人們生育意愿的滑坡,。在這些因素中,,政府支持的缺位占了大頭:在工業(yè)化國(guó)家中,美國(guó)仍然是唯一一個(gè)沒(méi)有實(shí)行普適性的帶薪家庭假政策的國(guó)家,。而在有助于提高生育意愿的兒童保育和學(xué)前教育政策方面,,美國(guó)政府也未能提出好政策。

卡尼和萊文表示,,出生率可能會(huì)反彈到疫情前的數(shù)字,,因?yàn)橐恍┤酥皇峭七t生育計(jì)劃,而不是決定不生,。但是隨著疫情持續(xù)時(shí)間越來(lái)越長(zhǎng),,產(chǎn)生的社會(huì)和經(jīng)濟(jì)影響也越來(lái)越深遠(yuǎn),,這一可能性將會(huì)越來(lái)越小,甚至產(chǎn)生嚴(yán)重的長(zhǎng)期后果,,例如造成未來(lái)勞動(dòng)力市場(chǎng)的萎縮,。

報(bào)告稱(chēng):“現(xiàn)在我們堅(jiān)持之前的預(yù)測(cè),即新冠疫情將導(dǎo)致嬰兒出生減少約30萬(wàn),。但疫情持續(xù)的時(shí)間越長(zhǎng),,經(jīng)濟(jì)和社會(huì)焦慮越深,我們或?qū)⒖吹礁鼑?yán)重的出生率下降情況,,永久性放棄生育計(jì)劃的人也將越來(lái)越多,。”(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))

編譯:楊二一

The baby boom some expected to occur after months of romantic partners quarantining at home together has failed to materialize, according to researchers at the Brookings Institution.

Rather, it’s quite the opposite: Melissa Kearney and Phillip Levine, economics professors at the University of Maryland and Wellesley College, respectively, say they expect 300,000 fewer births in 2021, in what they’re calling a COVID “baby bust.”

Their finding is based in part on evidence that shows a 1% increase in the national unemployment rate corresponds with an equivalent 1% drop in birth rates. In order to account for the fact that there is a public health crisis layered on top of an economic one, Kearney and Levine examined the impact of the 1918 Spanish flu on births, finding that spikes in flu deaths resulted in a decrease in the number of births nine months later.

These effects can be observed on both the macro and micro level: “There is a well-documented cycle to the nation’s birthrate: When the labor market is weak, aggregate birth rates decline; when the labor market improves, birth rates improve,” Kearney and Levine wrote in a New York Times op-ed on their research. “At the individual level, there is also a well-documented link between changes in income and births: When income increases, people often expand their families; when people experience job or income loss, they have fewer children.”

Kearney and Levine made a similar estimate in June, just a few months into the pandemic, writing in a Brookings report that myths about baby booms following snowstorms and blackouts were largely that—myths. This early prediction was also buoyed by findings from the Guttmacher Institute the same month, which detailed dramatic shifts in the way women were thinking about family planning during the pandemic.

The study found that more than 40% of women said they were altering their plans for when to have children or how many children they would have, and more than one-third of women said the pandemic had made them decide to delay pregnancy or have fewer children. Just 17% of respondents reported wanting to have children sooner or to have more of them because of the pandemic.

A certain amount of common sense dictates that this must be the case. Women have suffered some of the highest rates of unemployment in recent months, and mothers especially have been effectively pushed out of the workforce because of school closures and lapses in childcare.

This is only an acute symptom of a much larger problem. Birth rates have been falling in the United States for years now, the result of a confluence of social, cultural, and economic factors that have made childbearing less desirable for many people. The most obvious among these factors is the lack of government support for parents: The U.S. continues to be the only industrialized country that doesn’t have a universal paid family leave policy in place. It also lacks both universal childcare and preschool policies, which can make it more feasible for people to have children.

Kearney and Levine say it’s possible birth rates will begin to rebound to pre-pandemic numbers, since some people are delaying pregnancy, not abandoning the desire to have children altogether. But the longer the pandemic—and the social and economic conditions created by it—go on, the less that may be true, which could lead to long-term consequences, like a shrinking workforce.

“As of now, we stand by our prediction of a COVID baby bust of around 300,000 fewer births,” they report. “But the longer the pandemic lasts, and the deeper the economic and social anxiety runs, it is feasible that we will see an even larger reduction in births with an increasing share of them averted permanently.”

財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)所刊載內(nèi)容之知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)為財(cái)富媒體知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)有限公司及/或相關(guān)權(quán)利人專(zhuān)屬所有或持有,。未經(jīng)許可,,禁止進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)載、摘編,、復(fù)制及建立鏡像等任何使用,。
0條Plus
精彩評(píng)論
評(píng)論

撰寫(xiě)或查看更多評(píng)論

請(qǐng)打開(kāi)財(cái)富Plus APP

前往打開(kāi)
熱讀文章