當(dāng)新冠疫情開始時(shí),杰西·莫格勒擔(dān)任急診室護(hù)士還不到一年,。他說(shuō),那段時(shí)間里他在美國(guó)新墨西哥州法明頓市的圣胡安地區(qū)醫(yī)療中心(San Juan Regional Medical Center)繁忙的急診室工作,,當(dāng)時(shí)就有旅行護(hù)士,每個(gè)班次可能一到兩人,。旅行護(hù)士的經(jīng)驗(yàn)往往不如全職護(hù)士,幫助他們適應(yīng)急診室的做事方式也要資深護(hù)士花費(fèi)不少時(shí)間,。盡管如此,旅行護(hù)士還是很有幫助,,尤其是人們不喜歡的晚班。
等到一年后他離開時(shí),,新冠病毒的傳播已經(jīng)呈現(xiàn)出燎原之勢(shì),醫(yī)院里也到處是旅行護(hù)士,,尤其是晚班和夜班,。他說(shuō),,有時(shí)甚至是半夜負(fù)責(zé)統(tǒng)管各項(xiàng)事務(wù)的主管護(hù)士也是“旅行護(hù)士”,。
莫格勒2018年畢業(yè)于護(hù)理學(xué)校,他發(fā)現(xiàn)自己正在迅速變成業(yè)內(nèi)經(jīng)驗(yàn)最豐富的護(hù)士之一,。當(dāng)時(shí)他需要照顧的病人數(shù)量比以往任何時(shí)候都多,有時(shí)還負(fù)責(zé)6到10個(gè)急診病例,。
莫格勒說(shuō),在學(xué)校里,,老師不斷強(qiáng)調(diào),,分配給護(hù)士的病人如果出現(xiàn)可以預(yù)防的事故或死亡,護(hù)士就可能面臨質(zhì)詢甚至撤銷護(hù)理執(zhí)照,更別提知曉自己為不必要的痛苦承擔(dān)責(zé)任帶來(lái)的創(chuàng)傷,?!拔覀?cè)桨l(fā)感覺(jué)到,每次上班都在努力避免創(chuàng)傷性事故,、創(chuàng)傷或危重病人,,阻止不必要的死亡?!彼f(shuō)?!安∪撕芪kU(xiǎn),當(dāng)護(hù)士也很危險(xiǎn),。”
為了給日漸耗盡精力的工作爭(zhēng)取更高薪水(也是為了盡快擺脫感覺(jué)不安全的環(huán)境),,莫格勒在旅行護(hù)士求職公告欄上發(fā)布了消息,,而且很快就收到了大量招聘短信和語(yǔ)音郵件,。今年10月,,他開始聯(lián)系招聘方,,決定前往新墨西哥州的杜蘭戈工作到2021年年底,每小時(shí)的收入是全職護(hù)士的四倍,。
從早期的呼吸機(jī)短缺到如今無(wú)休止拖延的常規(guī)程序,新冠病毒對(duì)醫(yī)療行業(yè)的影響非常廣泛,。但最顯著的影響之一是對(duì)照顧病人的職業(yè)市場(chǎng)的影響。對(duì)愿意為出價(jià)最高者工作的人們而言,,旅行護(hù)士需求激增大幅提升了其工資?;谶^(guò)去90天內(nèi)59000份活躍招聘職位的信息,,醫(yī)療保健工作委員會(huì)(Healthcare job board)的維維安估計(jì),目前美國(guó)旅行注冊(cè)護(hù)士的平均工資幾乎達(dá)到每周3200美元,。按照維維安的說(shuō)法,平均每周工作36小時(shí)的旅行護(hù)士的時(shí)薪近90美元,。根據(jù)美國(guó)勞工統(tǒng)計(jì)局(Bureau of Labor Statistics)的數(shù)據(jù),這一水平是2020年美國(guó)護(hù)理人員時(shí)薪中位數(shù)的兩倍多,。但一些人表示,人員輪換破壞了醫(yī)院穩(wěn)定,,而即將進(jìn)入新冠疫情第三年的醫(yī)護(hù)人員已經(jīng)瀕臨崩潰。隨著冬季疫情病例激增,,奧密克戎變異毒株來(lái)勢(shì)洶洶,再加上流感季的到來(lái),,重癥監(jiān)護(hù)室紛紛開始補(bǔ)充人手,,協(xié)助醫(yī)院運(yùn)行的不穩(wěn)定系統(tǒng)將面臨挑戰(zhàn)。
成為“旅行護(hù)士”
蒙大拿州立大學(xué)(Montana State University)的護(hù)理政策專家彼得·布爾豪斯稱,,早在20世紀(jì)70年代,,旅行護(hù)士就已經(jīng)存在,?!斑@群人從來(lái)都不是護(hù)士隊(duì)伍的重要組成部分?!彼f(shuō)。該領(lǐng)域一度被用來(lái)填補(bǔ)局部護(hù)士短缺,,在新冠疫情爆發(fā)前就開始增長(zhǎng)。市場(chǎng)研究機(jī)構(gòu)Grand View Research于2020年年初發(fā)布的一份市場(chǎng)報(bào)告稱,,僅2019年一年,旅行護(hù)士市場(chǎng)就增長(zhǎng)了7%,,部分原因是醫(yī)院正在削減全職員工成本,。
自新冠疫情爆發(fā)以來(lái),,旅行護(hù)士的市場(chǎng)規(guī)模不斷增長(zhǎng)。據(jù)Staffing Industry Analysts告訴估計(jì),,2020年,美國(guó)旅行護(hù)士人力資源行業(yè)增長(zhǎng)了35%,,從2019年的62億美元增至84億美元。Staffing Industry Analysts預(yù)計(jì)到2021年年底,,這一市場(chǎng)將進(jìn)一步擴(kuò)大40%,,達(dá)到118億美元。
“雖然2020年和2021年的旅行護(hù)士人數(shù)增長(zhǎng)迅速,,但市場(chǎng)規(guī)模增長(zhǎng)在很大程度上是因?yàn)樾枨笈c供給不平衡導(dǎo)致工資的大幅上升?!盨taffing Industry Analysts的北美研究主管蒂莫西·蘭德胡伊斯說(shuō),。
Facebook(已改名為Meta——編注)的活躍群組“周薪至少5000美元的旅行護(hù)士工作”(Traveling Nurse Jobs $5,000 a week and up)的成員超過(guò)10萬(wàn)人,招聘人員發(fā)布的信息和帖子非常多,。不管是招聘網(wǎng)站還是Facebook小組,,都是旅行護(hù)士找工作的主要方式。AMN Healthcare是美國(guó)最大的醫(yī)療人才公司之一,,今年5月,,公司的首席執(zhí)行官蘇珊·薩爾卡在美國(guó)銀行(Bank of America)的醫(yī)療狀況虛擬會(huì)議上表示,該公司的業(yè)務(wù)主要依靠口碑來(lái)推動(dòng),。
在新冠疫情期間,,醫(yī)療人才公司的收入相當(dāng)可觀。AMN Healthcare的2021年三季報(bào)中收入相比2020年增幅達(dá)60%,。另一家知名公司Cross Country Healthcare的業(yè)績(jī)?cè)鲩L(zhǎng)更加明顯,,2021年三季度同比增幅達(dá)93%。
通常來(lái)說(shuō),,旅行護(hù)士只能夠在護(hù)理執(zhí)照有效的特定州或地區(qū)工作,。喬治·華盛頓大學(xué)(George Washington University)的衛(wèi)生人力研究中心(Health Workforce Research Center)的主任波利·皮特曼說(shuō),第一波疫情期間,,州政府放松了限制,,旅行護(hù)理的案例也為人才跨州流動(dòng)至最需要的地方工作提供了框架。到第三波疫情時(shí),,新冠病毒已經(jīng)無(wú)處不在,,護(hù)士仍然可以自由選擇工作地點(diǎn)。競(jìng)價(jià)大戰(zhàn)隨后爆發(fā),。
“我認(rèn)為旅行護(hù)士具有重要的作用,,如果適度的話?!逼ぬ芈f(shuō)。大量研究表明,,如果過(guò)多聘用旅行護(hù)士,,對(duì)醫(yī)院底線,、員工士氣或患者并無(wú)益處。
皮特曼說(shuō),,在新冠疫情期間,財(cái)力充足的大型醫(yī)院招聘的護(hù)士已經(jīng)足夠,。然而為新冠病毒易感人群提供治療的小型醫(yī)院,,例如圣胡安地區(qū)醫(yī)院(San Juan Regional),,一家只有250張床位的社區(qū)醫(yī)院,想穩(wěn)住員工并花錢聘請(qǐng)旅行護(hù)士就很困難,。
花錢請(qǐng)旅行護(hù)士會(huì)嚴(yán)重影響醫(yī)院的底線,,也會(huì)影響護(hù)理質(zhì)量。2021年,,美國(guó)醫(yī)療保健人才和保留機(jī)構(gòu)NSI護(hù)理解決方案公司(NSI Nursing Solutions)對(duì)超過(guò)3000家醫(yī)院進(jìn)行調(diào)查后估計(jì),醫(yī)院如果能夠少請(qǐng)20位旅行護(hù)士,,平均就可以節(jié)省300萬(wàn)美元。
醫(yī)院與全職員工的關(guān)系也因此遇到了挑戰(zhàn),。皮特曼告訴《財(cái)富》雜志,,在新冠疫情期間,醫(yī)院廣泛聘請(qǐng)旅行護(hù)士,,全職護(hù)士們不禁想問(wèn),為什么醫(yī)院不愿意花錢為他們提高待遇,,多招一些全職護(hù)士減輕負(fù)擔(dān),。“結(jié)果陷入了士氣低落的惡性循環(huán),?!逼ぬ芈f(shuō)。
很多護(hù)理人員精疲力竭且負(fù)擔(dān)過(guò)重,,不斷有人離開行業(yè),,或者像莫格勒一樣轉(zhuǎn)向旅行護(hù)士,。“如果普通護(hù)士每小時(shí)掙50美元,,而旅行護(hù)士每小時(shí)掙150美元,差距就實(shí)在太大了,。”全美黑人護(hù)士協(xié)會(huì)(National Black Nurses Association)的主席瑪莎·道森說(shuō),?!拔也荒芤虼朔磳?duì)旅行護(hù)士,只能說(shuō)現(xiàn)有制度為他們提供了很強(qiáng)的賺錢能力,?!?/p>
“郁積之火”
匹茲堡大學(xué)(University of Pittsburgh)的護(hù)理學(xué)博士后朱厄爾·斯科特認(rèn)為,新冠疫情爆發(fā)前的護(hù)理行業(yè)仿佛郁積之火,。如果一直觀察該行業(yè),,就會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)諸如全職員工比例過(guò)低,、責(zé)任不斷增加和缺乏制度支持等問(wèn)題熱度不斷上升。然而如果離得遠(yuǎn)一些,,是無(wú)法發(fā)現(xiàn)的?!靶鹿谝咔楸l(fā)像有人在火上倒了一桶汽油,?!彼箍铺卣f(shuō)。
曾經(jīng)幾乎所有護(hù)士都要學(xué)習(xí)一年獲得資格證書,,也就是LPN,執(zhí)業(yè)護(hù)士執(zhí)照,,整個(gè)職業(yè)生涯都在一兩家機(jī)構(gòu)度過(guò)。過(guò)去40年里,,隨著醫(yī)療普遍更加高科技和專業(yè)化,護(hù)理專業(yè)化程度顯著提高,。如今,,大多數(shù)美國(guó)護(hù)士都獲得了三年制學(xué)位,,然后成為注冊(cè)護(hù)士,,很多人還會(huì)繼續(xù)深造。很多人成了能夠在無(wú)醫(yī)生監(jiān)督時(shí)工作的執(zhí)業(yè)護(hù)士,,獲得例如護(hù)士麻醉師等更專業(yè)的職位,,有些護(hù)士甚至攻讀博士學(xué)位,,然后進(jìn)入學(xué)術(shù)界。
各項(xiàng)因素都意味著,,作為醫(yī)院和療養(yǎng)院主力的急癥護(hù)理注冊(cè)護(hù)士供應(yīng)比過(guò)去少得多。布爾豪斯表示:“總是存在缺護(hù)士的情況”,,而導(dǎo)致本地短缺的因素可能是,某個(gè)科室有幾名護(hù)士同時(shí)休育兒假,,或者被競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手醫(yī)院挖走。
但過(guò)去幾十年的趨勢(shì)加劇了結(jié)構(gòu)性短缺,,全美護(hù)理人員體系更加脆弱,。在注冊(cè)護(hù)士中,有相當(dāng)一部分是嬰兒潮一代,。自2000年達(dá)到頂峰以來(lái),,很多護(hù)士已經(jīng)退休。在新冠疫情爆發(fā)前,,每年約有70000名護(hù)士退休,。
如果從勞動(dòng)力總數(shù)來(lái)看,這個(gè)比例并不高,?!暗侨绻紤]到很多具有20年,、30年工作經(jīng)驗(yàn)的老人離開,需要替換人員數(shù)字就很大了,。”布爾豪斯說(shuō),。在過(guò)去幾年里,他和同事一直聽(tīng)到醫(yī)院抱怨,,在復(fù)雜且要求高的領(lǐng)域里,,例如重癥監(jiān)護(hù)和急診護(hù)理科室,,想招聘經(jīng)驗(yàn)豐富的護(hù)士很困難。
根據(jù)美國(guó)勞工統(tǒng)計(jì)局的數(shù)據(jù),,目前全美正在從業(yè)的注冊(cè)護(hù)士約有308萬(wàn)人,。預(yù)計(jì)到2030年,需求將增長(zhǎng)9%,,也就是缺近30萬(wàn)名護(hù)士,。但在今年4月,,美國(guó)護(hù)理學(xué)院協(xié)會(huì)(American Association of Colleges of Nursing)的報(bào)告稱,盡管勞動(dòng)力主體逐漸退休,,對(duì)護(hù)士的需求也在增長(zhǎng),但去年全美各地的護(hù)理學(xué)校拒絕了超過(guò)6萬(wàn)名的合格申請(qǐng)者,。
主要原因是護(hù)理學(xué)校師資力量不足,尤其是有色人種師資,。斯科特指出,全職護(hù)理教授里有色人種占比不到10%,。大約四分之一的護(hù)士都是有色人種,。研究表明,,無(wú)論學(xué)生的種族如何,,如果能夠向多民族文化背景的人學(xué)習(xí),成績(jī)就會(huì)更好,。有色人種的學(xué)生受益更大,,因?yàn)橛袡C(jī)會(huì)獲得分享自己經(jīng)歷的教師指導(dǎo),歸屬感也更強(qiáng),。
從斯科特的經(jīng)歷來(lái)看,,她說(shuō)有一位黑人護(hù)理教授瑪瓦·普萊斯曾經(jīng)主動(dòng)與她討論攻讀研究生的問(wèn)題,激勵(lì)她爭(zhēng)取更高學(xué)歷,并最終成為護(hù)理教授,?!昂翢o(wú)疑問(wèn),,支持非常重要?!彼f(shuō)。
培訓(xùn)護(hù)士不僅僅在教室里,。加州大學(xué)舊金山分校衛(wèi)生政策研究所(UCSF Institute for Health Policy)的所長(zhǎng)喬安妮·斯佩茨說(shuō),,很少有醫(yī)院向護(hù)士在職培訓(xùn)投資,,現(xiàn)在身兼重負(fù)的老護(hù)士們紛紛離開,極其重要的實(shí)踐教學(xué)存在缺失,。
當(dāng)新冠疫情來(lái)襲時(shí),種種背后的問(wèn)題變得非常緊迫,。“極其狹窄的專業(yè)迅速出現(xiàn)壓倒性需求,,醫(yī)院均受到?jīng)_擊,?!辈紶柡浪拐f(shuō),。實(shí)習(xí)護(hù)士,、新手護(hù)士被迫跟隨留下的經(jīng)驗(yàn)豐富護(hù)士一起提供重癥護(hù)理。這是惡性循環(huán),?!叭藛T編制不足導(dǎo)致護(hù)士流失,,而護(hù)士流失導(dǎo)致編制減少?!泵绹?guó)重癥護(hù)理護(hù)士協(xié)會(huì)(American Association of Critical-Care Nurses)最近發(fā)表的一篇評(píng)論稱,。這一循環(huán)在新冠疫情期間愈加棘手。麥肯錫公司(McKinsey & Company)最近一項(xiàng)調(diào)查表明,,美國(guó)22%的護(hù)士計(jì)劃未來(lái)兩年內(nèi)可能不再?gòu)氖轮苯幼o(hù)理病人的工作,。參與調(diào)查的300多名受訪者面臨的首要問(wèn)題是:人員不足?!霸谛鹿谝咔槠陂g,,以往相對(duì)安全的照顧病人數(shù)量被拉到極限,。”密歇根大學(xué)(University of Michigan)的護(hù)理教授蘇·安妮·貝爾說(shuō),,她專門研究防災(zāi)領(lǐng)域,新冠疫情期間,,曾經(jīng)在社區(qū)工作了四個(gè)月,。
除了降低護(hù)士的工作滿意度,人員流動(dòng)也明顯增加了勞動(dòng)力成本,。NSI的報(bào)告發(fā)現(xiàn),2021年,,每失去一位注冊(cè)護(hù)士的平均成本為40038美元,,而且單個(gè)損失會(huì)迅速累積,。一家醫(yī)院人員輪換率每降低一個(gè)百分點(diǎn),每年平均能夠節(jié)省270800美元,。最近一組研究人員在一項(xiàng)定量研究中寫道,護(hù)士輪換也會(huì)降低護(hù)理質(zhì)量,?!坝盟庡e(cuò)誤、跌倒或其他與護(hù)士相關(guān)的情況出現(xiàn)幾率可能增加,,其中也包括醫(yī)療相關(guān)感染?!?/p>
“全美危機(jī)”
從這個(gè)意義上說(shuō),,旅行護(hù)士造成了棘手的問(wèn)題,。雖然旅行護(hù)士提升了小部分極度疲累護(hù)士的地位,也能夠提供一定安慰,,然而導(dǎo)致的問(wèn)題也更加嚴(yán)重,讓護(hù)理工作從一開始就變困難,。美國(guó)公共衛(wèi)生協(xié)會(huì)(Public Health Association)的主席喬治·本杰明表示,導(dǎo)致當(dāng)前危機(jī)的長(zhǎng)期問(wèn)題并不會(huì)迅速消失,。他說(shuō),各項(xiàng)問(wèn)題可以隨著時(shí)間推移逐步解決,,不過(guò)需要持續(xù)努力。
但解決問(wèn)題的第一步是承認(rèn)問(wèn)題存在,。9月1日,,美國(guó)護(hù)士協(xié)會(huì)(American Nurses Association)向美國(guó)衛(wèi)生與公共服務(wù)部(Department of Health and Human Service)的部長(zhǎng)澤維爾·貝塞拉提交了一封信,。協(xié)會(huì)請(qǐng)貝塞拉宣布“全國(guó)護(hù)士出現(xiàn)人員危機(jī),并立即采取措施制定并實(shí)施短期和長(zhǎng)期解決方案,。”
“我們非常盼望很快收到貝塞拉部長(zhǎng)的回復(fù),。”信件提交一周后,,美國(guó)護(hù)士協(xié)會(huì)的主席歐內(nèi)斯特·格蘭特對(duì)《財(cái)富》雜志表示,。截至12月本文發(fā)布時(shí),,該協(xié)會(huì)仍未收到回應(yīng),。
至于離開全職崗位成為旅行護(hù)士的莫格勒,,對(duì)自己的選擇也很糾結(jié)。他說(shuō):“離開病情嚴(yán)重急需護(hù)理的病人,,人手嚴(yán)重不足的醫(yī)院,,還有無(wú)法像我一樣轉(zhuǎn)型的同事們,,我感覺(jué)并不好?!?/p>
但是,工作量太大存在風(fēng)險(xiǎn),,他和同事也感覺(jué)不到醫(yī)院的支持,這些都是他選擇離開的重要原因,。他說(shuō):“我會(huì)一份合同一份合同地工作,,直到?jīng)]有什么錢可賺,或者情況開始改善,,全職護(hù)士工作的吸引力提高了再說(shuō)?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:梁宇
審校:夏林
當(dāng)新冠疫情開始時(shí),,杰西·莫格勒擔(dān)任急診室護(hù)士還不到一年,。他說(shuō),那段時(shí)間里他在美國(guó)新墨西哥州法明頓市的圣胡安地區(qū)醫(yī)療中心(San Juan Regional Medical Center)繁忙的急診室工作,,當(dāng)時(shí)就有旅行護(hù)士,每個(gè)班次可能一到兩人,。旅行護(hù)士的經(jīng)驗(yàn)往往不如全職護(hù)士,,幫助他們適應(yīng)急診室的做事方式也要資深護(hù)士花費(fèi)不少時(shí)間,。盡管如此,旅行護(hù)士還是很有幫助,,尤其是人們不喜歡的晚班,。
等到一年后他離開時(shí),,新冠病毒的傳播已經(jīng)呈現(xiàn)出燎原之勢(shì),醫(yī)院里也到處是旅行護(hù)士,,尤其是晚班和夜班。他說(shuō),,有時(shí)甚至是半夜負(fù)責(zé)統(tǒng)管各項(xiàng)事務(wù)的主管護(hù)士也是“旅行護(hù)士”。
莫格勒2018年畢業(yè)于護(hù)理學(xué)校,,他發(fā)現(xiàn)自己正在迅速變成業(yè)內(nèi)經(jīng)驗(yàn)最豐富的護(hù)士之一。當(dāng)時(shí)他需要照顧的病人數(shù)量比以往任何時(shí)候都多,,有時(shí)還負(fù)責(zé)6到10個(gè)急診病例。
莫格勒說(shuō),,在學(xué)校里,,老師不斷強(qiáng)調(diào),,分配給護(hù)士的病人如果出現(xiàn)可以預(yù)防的事故或死亡,護(hù)士就可能面臨質(zhì)詢甚至撤銷護(hù)理執(zhí)照,,更別提知曉自己為不必要的痛苦承擔(dān)責(zé)任帶來(lái)的創(chuàng)傷?!拔覀?cè)桨l(fā)感覺(jué)到,,每次上班都在努力避免創(chuàng)傷性事故,、創(chuàng)傷或危重病人,阻止不必要的死亡,。”他說(shuō),?!安∪撕芪kU(xiǎn),,當(dāng)護(hù)士也很危險(xiǎn),?!?/p>
為了給日漸耗盡精力的工作爭(zhēng)取更高薪水(也是為了盡快擺脫感覺(jué)不安全的環(huán)境),莫格勒在旅行護(hù)士求職公告欄上發(fā)布了消息,,而且很快就收到了大量招聘短信和語(yǔ)音郵件。今年10月,,他開始聯(lián)系招聘方,決定前往新墨西哥州的杜蘭戈工作到2021年年底,,每小時(shí)的收入是全職護(hù)士的四倍,。
從早期的呼吸機(jī)短缺到如今無(wú)休止拖延的常規(guī)程序,,新冠病毒對(duì)醫(yī)療行業(yè)的影響非常廣泛,。但最顯著的影響之一是對(duì)照顧病人的職業(yè)市場(chǎng)的影響。對(duì)愿意為出價(jià)最高者工作的人們而言,,旅行護(hù)士需求激增大幅提升了其工資?;谶^(guò)去90天內(nèi)59000份活躍招聘職位的信息,,醫(yī)療保健工作委員會(huì)(Healthcare job board)的維維安估計(jì),目前美國(guó)旅行注冊(cè)護(hù)士的平均工資幾乎達(dá)到每周3200美元,。按照維維安的說(shuō)法,平均每周工作36小時(shí)的旅行護(hù)士的時(shí)薪近90美元,。根據(jù)美國(guó)勞工統(tǒng)計(jì)局(Bureau of Labor Statistics)的數(shù)據(jù),,這一水平是2020年美國(guó)護(hù)理人員時(shí)薪中位數(shù)的兩倍多,。但一些人表示,人員輪換破壞了醫(yī)院穩(wěn)定,,而即將進(jìn)入新冠疫情第三年的醫(yī)護(hù)人員已經(jīng)瀕臨崩潰,。隨著冬季疫情病例激增,,奧密克戎變異毒株來(lái)勢(shì)洶洶,再加上流感季的到來(lái),,重癥監(jiān)護(hù)室紛紛開始補(bǔ)充人手,,協(xié)助醫(yī)院運(yùn)行的不穩(wěn)定系統(tǒng)將面臨挑戰(zhàn),。
成為“旅行護(hù)士”
蒙大拿州立大學(xué)(Montana State University)的護(hù)理政策專家彼得·布爾豪斯稱,早在20世紀(jì)70年代,,旅行護(hù)士就已經(jīng)存在?!斑@群人從來(lái)都不是護(hù)士隊(duì)伍的重要組成部分?!彼f(shuō),。該領(lǐng)域一度被用來(lái)填補(bǔ)局部護(hù)士短缺,,在新冠疫情爆發(fā)前就開始增長(zhǎng)。市場(chǎng)研究機(jī)構(gòu)Grand View Research于2020年年初發(fā)布的一份市場(chǎng)報(bào)告稱,,僅2019年一年,旅行護(hù)士市場(chǎng)就增長(zhǎng)了7%,,部分原因是醫(yī)院正在削減全職員工成本。
自新冠疫情爆發(fā)以來(lái),,旅行護(hù)士的市場(chǎng)規(guī)模不斷增長(zhǎng),。據(jù)Staffing Industry Analysts告訴估計(jì),,2020年,美國(guó)旅行護(hù)士人力資源行業(yè)增長(zhǎng)了35%,,從2019年的62億美元增至84億美元。Staffing Industry Analysts預(yù)計(jì)到2021年年底,這一市場(chǎng)將進(jìn)一步擴(kuò)大40%,,達(dá)到118億美元。
“雖然2020年和2021年的旅行護(hù)士人數(shù)增長(zhǎng)迅速,,但市場(chǎng)規(guī)模增長(zhǎng)在很大程度上是因?yàn)樾枨笈c供給不平衡導(dǎo)致工資的大幅上升,?!盨taffing Industry Analysts的北美研究主管蒂莫西·蘭德胡伊斯說(shuō)。
Facebook(已改名為Meta——編注)的活躍群組“周薪至少5000美元的旅行護(hù)士工作”(Traveling Nurse Jobs $5,000 a week and up)的成員超過(guò)10萬(wàn)人,,招聘人員發(fā)布的信息和帖子非常多。不管是招聘網(wǎng)站還是Facebook小組,,都是旅行護(hù)士找工作的主要方式。AMN Healthcare是美國(guó)最大的醫(yī)療人才公司之一,,今年5月,公司的首席執(zhí)行官蘇珊·薩爾卡在美國(guó)銀行(Bank of America)的醫(yī)療狀況虛擬會(huì)議上表示,,該公司的業(yè)務(wù)主要依靠口碑來(lái)推動(dòng)。
在新冠疫情期間,,醫(yī)療人才公司的收入相當(dāng)可觀。AMN Healthcare的2021年三季報(bào)中收入相比2020年增幅達(dá)60%,。另一家知名公司Cross Country Healthcare的業(yè)績(jī)?cè)鲩L(zhǎng)更加明顯,,2021年三季度同比增幅達(dá)93%,。
通常來(lái)說(shuō),旅行護(hù)士只能夠在護(hù)理執(zhí)照有效的特定州或地區(qū)工作,。喬治·華盛頓大學(xué)(George Washington University)的衛(wèi)生人力研究中心(Health Workforce Research Center)的主任波利·皮特曼說(shuō),第一波疫情期間,州政府放松了限制,,旅行護(hù)理的案例也為人才跨州流動(dòng)至最需要的地方工作提供了框架,。到第三波疫情時(shí),,新冠病毒已經(jīng)無(wú)處不在,,護(hù)士仍然可以自由選擇工作地點(diǎn),。競(jìng)價(jià)大戰(zhàn)隨后爆發(fā)。
“我認(rèn)為旅行護(hù)士具有重要的作用,,如果適度的話?!逼ぬ芈f(shuō)。大量研究表明,,如果過(guò)多聘用旅行護(hù)士,,對(duì)醫(yī)院底線,、員工士氣或患者并無(wú)益處,。
皮特曼說(shuō),在新冠疫情期間,,財(cái)力充足的大型醫(yī)院招聘的護(hù)士已經(jīng)足夠。然而為新冠病毒易感人群提供治療的小型醫(yī)院,,例如圣胡安地區(qū)醫(yī)院(San Juan Regional),一家只有250張床位的社區(qū)醫(yī)院,,想穩(wěn)住員工并花錢聘請(qǐng)旅行護(hù)士就很困難。
花錢請(qǐng)旅行護(hù)士會(huì)嚴(yán)重影響醫(yī)院的底線,,也會(huì)影響護(hù)理質(zhì)量。2021年,,美國(guó)醫(yī)療保健人才和保留機(jī)構(gòu)NSI護(hù)理解決方案公司(NSI Nursing Solutions)對(duì)超過(guò)3000家醫(yī)院進(jìn)行調(diào)查后估計(jì),醫(yī)院如果能夠少請(qǐng)20位旅行護(hù)士,,平均就可以節(jié)省300萬(wàn)美元。
醫(yī)院與全職員工的關(guān)系也因此遇到了挑戰(zhàn)。皮特曼告訴《財(cái)富》雜志,,在新冠疫情期間,醫(yī)院廣泛聘請(qǐng)旅行護(hù)士,,全職護(hù)士們不禁想問(wèn),,為什么醫(yī)院不愿意花錢為他們提高待遇,,多招一些全職護(hù)士減輕負(fù)擔(dān),。“結(jié)果陷入了士氣低落的惡性循環(huán),。”皮特曼說(shuō),。
很多護(hù)理人員精疲力竭且負(fù)擔(dān)過(guò)重,,不斷有人離開行業(yè),,或者像莫格勒一樣轉(zhuǎn)向旅行護(hù)士?!叭绻胀ㄗo(hù)士每小時(shí)掙50美元,而旅行護(hù)士每小時(shí)掙150美元,,差距就實(shí)在太大了,?!比篮谌俗o(hù)士協(xié)會(huì)(National Black Nurses Association)的主席瑪莎·道森說(shuō)?!拔也荒芤虼朔磳?duì)旅行護(hù)士,只能說(shuō)現(xiàn)有制度為他們提供了很強(qiáng)的賺錢能力,。”
“郁積之火”
匹茲堡大學(xué)(University of Pittsburgh)的護(hù)理學(xué)博士后朱厄爾·斯科特認(rèn)為,,新冠疫情爆發(fā)前的護(hù)理行業(yè)仿佛郁積之火,。如果一直觀察該行業(yè),就會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)諸如全職員工比例過(guò)低,、責(zé)任不斷增加和缺乏制度支持等問(wèn)題熱度不斷上升。然而如果離得遠(yuǎn)一些,,是無(wú)法發(fā)現(xiàn)的?!靶鹿谝咔楸l(fā)像有人在火上倒了一桶汽油,?!彼箍铺卣f(shuō)。
曾經(jīng)幾乎所有護(hù)士都要學(xué)習(xí)一年獲得資格證書,,也就是LPN,執(zhí)業(yè)護(hù)士執(zhí)照,,整個(gè)職業(yè)生涯都在一兩家機(jī)構(gòu)度過(guò),。過(guò)去40年里,,隨著醫(yī)療普遍更加高科技和專業(yè)化,護(hù)理專業(yè)化程度顯著提高,。如今,,大多數(shù)美國(guó)護(hù)士都獲得了三年制學(xué)位,,然后成為注冊(cè)護(hù)士,很多人還會(huì)繼續(xù)深造,。很多人成了能夠在無(wú)醫(yī)生監(jiān)督時(shí)工作的執(zhí)業(yè)護(hù)士,獲得例如護(hù)士麻醉師等更專業(yè)的職位,,有些護(hù)士甚至攻讀博士學(xué)位,然后進(jìn)入學(xué)術(shù)界,。
各項(xiàng)因素都意味著,,作為醫(yī)院和療養(yǎng)院主力的急癥護(hù)理注冊(cè)護(hù)士供應(yīng)比過(guò)去少得多,。布爾豪斯表示:“總是存在缺護(hù)士的情況”,,而導(dǎo)致本地短缺的因素可能是,,某個(gè)科室有幾名護(hù)士同時(shí)休育兒假,或者被競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手醫(yī)院挖走,。
但過(guò)去幾十年的趨勢(shì)加劇了結(jié)構(gòu)性短缺,,全美護(hù)理人員體系更加脆弱,。在注冊(cè)護(hù)士中,,有相當(dāng)一部分是嬰兒潮一代。自2000年達(dá)到頂峰以來(lái),,很多護(hù)士已經(jīng)退休。在新冠疫情爆發(fā)前,,每年約有70000名護(hù)士退休,。
如果從勞動(dòng)力總數(shù)來(lái)看,,這個(gè)比例并不高?!暗侨绻紤]到很多具有20年、30年工作經(jīng)驗(yàn)的老人離開,,需要替換人員數(shù)字就很大了?!辈紶柡浪拐f(shuō),。在過(guò)去幾年里,,他和同事一直聽(tīng)到醫(yī)院抱怨,在復(fù)雜且要求高的領(lǐng)域里,,例如重癥監(jiān)護(hù)和急診護(hù)理科室,,想招聘經(jīng)驗(yàn)豐富的護(hù)士很困難,。
根據(jù)美國(guó)勞工統(tǒng)計(jì)局的數(shù)據(jù),,目前全美正在從業(yè)的注冊(cè)護(hù)士約有308萬(wàn)人。預(yù)計(jì)到2030年,,需求將增長(zhǎng)9%,也就是缺近30萬(wàn)名護(hù)士,。但在今年4月,美國(guó)護(hù)理學(xué)院協(xié)會(huì)(American Association of Colleges of Nursing)的報(bào)告稱,,盡管勞動(dòng)力主體逐漸退休,對(duì)護(hù)士的需求也在增長(zhǎng),,但去年全美各地的護(hù)理學(xué)校拒絕了超過(guò)6萬(wàn)名的合格申請(qǐng)者。
主要原因是護(hù)理學(xué)校師資力量不足,,尤其是有色人種師資,。斯科特指出,,全職護(hù)理教授里有色人種占比不到10%。大約四分之一的護(hù)士都是有色人種,。研究表明,無(wú)論學(xué)生的種族如何,,如果能夠向多民族文化背景的人學(xué)習(xí),,成績(jī)就會(huì)更好,。有色人種的學(xué)生受益更大,因?yàn)橛袡C(jī)會(huì)獲得分享自己經(jīng)歷的教師指導(dǎo),,歸屬感也更強(qiáng),。
從斯科特的經(jīng)歷來(lái)看,,她說(shuō)有一位黑人護(hù)理教授瑪瓦·普萊斯曾經(jīng)主動(dòng)與她討論攻讀研究生的問(wèn)題,激勵(lì)她爭(zhēng)取更高學(xué)歷,,并最終成為護(hù)理教授,?!昂翢o(wú)疑問(wèn),,支持非常重要?!彼f(shuō)。
培訓(xùn)護(hù)士不僅僅在教室里,。加州大學(xué)舊金山分校衛(wèi)生政策研究所(UCSF Institute for Health Policy)的所長(zhǎng)喬安妮·斯佩茨說(shuō),很少有醫(yī)院向護(hù)士在職培訓(xùn)投資,,現(xiàn)在身兼重負(fù)的老護(hù)士們紛紛離開,極其重要的實(shí)踐教學(xué)存在缺失,。
當(dāng)新冠疫情來(lái)襲時(shí),種種背后的問(wèn)題變得非常緊迫,。“極其狹窄的專業(yè)迅速出現(xiàn)壓倒性需求,,醫(yī)院均受到?jīng)_擊?!辈紶柡浪拐f(shuō)。實(shí)習(xí)護(hù)士,、新手護(hù)士被迫跟隨留下的經(jīng)驗(yàn)豐富護(hù)士一起提供重癥護(hù)理,。這是惡性循環(huán),?!叭藛T編制不足導(dǎo)致護(hù)士流失,而護(hù)士流失導(dǎo)致編制減少,。”美國(guó)重癥護(hù)理護(hù)士協(xié)會(huì)(American Association of Critical-Care Nurses)最近發(fā)表的一篇評(píng)論稱,。這一循環(huán)在新冠疫情期間愈加棘手。麥肯錫公司(McKinsey & Company)最近一項(xiàng)調(diào)查表明,,美國(guó)22%的護(hù)士計(jì)劃未來(lái)兩年內(nèi)可能不再?gòu)氖轮苯幼o(hù)理病人的工作,。參與調(diào)查的300多名受訪者面臨的首要問(wèn)題是:人員不足?!霸谛鹿谝咔槠陂g,以往相對(duì)安全的照顧病人數(shù)量被拉到極限,。”密歇根大學(xué)(University of Michigan)的護(hù)理教授蘇·安妮·貝爾說(shuō),,她專門研究防災(zāi)領(lǐng)域,新冠疫情期間,,曾經(jīng)在社區(qū)工作了四個(gè)月。
除了降低護(hù)士的工作滿意度,,人員流動(dòng)也明顯增加了勞動(dòng)力成本。NSI的報(bào)告發(fā)現(xiàn),,2021年,每失去一位注冊(cè)護(hù)士的平均成本為40038美元,,而且單個(gè)損失會(huì)迅速累積。一家醫(yī)院人員輪換率每降低一個(gè)百分點(diǎn),,每年平均能夠節(jié)省270800美元。最近一組研究人員在一項(xiàng)定量研究中寫道,,護(hù)士輪換也會(huì)降低護(hù)理質(zhì)量,?!坝盟庡e(cuò)誤、跌倒或其他與護(hù)士相關(guān)的情況出現(xiàn)幾率可能增加,,其中也包括醫(yī)療相關(guān)感染,?!?/p>
“全美危機(jī)”
從這個(gè)意義上說(shuō),旅行護(hù)士造成了棘手的問(wèn)題,。雖然旅行護(hù)士提升了小部分極度疲累護(hù)士的地位,,也能夠提供一定安慰,然而導(dǎo)致的問(wèn)題也更加嚴(yán)重,,讓護(hù)理工作從一開始就變困難。美國(guó)公共衛(wèi)生協(xié)會(huì)(Public Health Association)的主席喬治·本杰明表示,,導(dǎo)致當(dāng)前危機(jī)的長(zhǎng)期問(wèn)題并不會(huì)迅速消失。他說(shuō),,各項(xiàng)問(wèn)題可以隨著時(shí)間推移逐步解決,不過(guò)需要持續(xù)努力,。
但解決問(wèn)題的第一步是承認(rèn)問(wèn)題存在。9月1日,,美國(guó)護(hù)士協(xié)會(huì)(American Nurses Association)向美國(guó)衛(wèi)生與公共服務(wù)部(Department of Health and Human Service)的部長(zhǎng)澤維爾·貝塞拉提交了一封信。協(xié)會(huì)請(qǐng)貝塞拉宣布“全國(guó)護(hù)士出現(xiàn)人員危機(jī),,并立即采取措施制定并實(shí)施短期和長(zhǎng)期解決方案?!?/p>
“我們非常盼望很快收到貝塞拉部長(zhǎng)的回復(fù)?!毙偶峤灰恢芎螅绹?guó)護(hù)士協(xié)會(huì)的主席歐內(nèi)斯特·格蘭特對(duì)《財(cái)富》雜志表示,。截至12月本文發(fā)布時(shí),,該協(xié)會(huì)仍未收到回應(yīng),。
至于離開全職崗位成為旅行護(hù)士的莫格勒,對(duì)自己的選擇也很糾結(jié),。他說(shuō):“離開病情嚴(yán)重急需護(hù)理的病人,人手嚴(yán)重不足的醫(yī)院,,還有無(wú)法像我一樣轉(zhuǎn)型的同事們,我感覺(jué)并不好?!?/p>
但是,工作量太大存在風(fēng)險(xiǎn),,他和同事也感覺(jué)不到醫(yī)院的支持,這些都是他選擇離開的重要原因,。他說(shuō):“我會(huì)一份合同一份合同地工作,直到?jīng)]有什么錢可賺,,或者情況開始改善,全職護(hù)士工作的吸引力提高了再說(shuō),?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:梁宇
審校:夏林
Jesse Mogler had been working as an emergency room nurse for less than a year when the pandemic started. During that time, he says, he worked with travel nurses—maybe one or two per shift—in the busy ER of San Juan Regional Medical Center in Farmington, N.M. They were often less experienced than staff nurses, he says, and helping to orient them to the practices of the specific ER took time from more senior nurses on the floor. Still, the travel nurses were helpful, especially on the unpopular late shifts.
By the time he left, over a year later, the COVID-19 pandemic was in full swing, and the floor was primarily staffed by travel nurses—especially during the evening and overnight shifts. By midnight, he says, sometimes even the nurse in charge of running everything—known, appropriately, as the charge nurse—was a “traveler.”
Mogler, who finished nursing school in 2018, found that he was rapidly becoming one of the most experienced nurses on the floor. He was charged with looking after a higher number of patients than ever before, sometimes overseeing six to 10 emergency cases, he says.
In school, he says, teachers constantly reinforce that preventable accidents or deaths among the patients a nurse is assigned to can result in an inquest and the loss of your nursing license—to say nothing of the trauma of knowing you had a role in unnecessary suffering. “It increasingly felt like every shift, we [were] about one traumatic accident, one trauma or critical patient away from unnecessary deaths,” he says. “It was risky to be a patient. It was risky to be a nurse.”
Looking for higher compensation for an increasingly draining job (as well as the ability to move on quickly from an environment that felt unsafe), he posted on a travel nurse job board and got a rush of text messages and voicemails from recruiters. He started his first contact in October and will be working in Durango, N.M., until the end of 2021—making four times the hourly rate he made as a staff nurse.
COVID has transformed many aspects of health care—from early ventilator shortages to endlessly delayed routine procedures. But one of the most striking effects the virus has had is on the career market for the people that care for you. The explosion of travel nurses has massively increased pay for those willing to work for the highest bidder. Healthcare job board Vivian estimates that the average travel RN salary in the U.S. is presently almost $3,200 per week, based on 59,000 active job listings in the past 90 days. That works out to almost $90 per hour for the average 36-hour travel nursing week, according to Vivian. It's also more than twice the median hourly pay of a staff nurse in the United States in 2020, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. But a rotating cast of for-hire staffers has also, some say, destabilized hospitals where employees soon entering year three of the pandemic were already at a breaking point. As ICUs begin to fill up again with a winter COVID-19 surge and the Omicron variant, as well as flu season, this shaky system keeping hospitals afloat will be put to the test.
Becoming a “traveler”
Travel nurses were around as far back as the 1970s, says Peter Buerhaus, a nursing policy expert from Montana State University. “They have never been a large component of the nursing workforce,” he says. The field, once used to bridge brief localized nursing shortages, started growing pre-pandemic: A market report from Grand View Research published in early 2020 found that in 2019 alone the market for travel nurses grew by 7%, driven in part by hospitals’ ongoing attempts to cut permanent-staffing costs.
The market has ballooned in size since the pandemic began. Staffing Industry Analysts (SIA) estimates that the U.S. travel nurse staffing industry grew 35% in 2020, from $6.2 billion in 2019 to $8.4 billion. By the end of 2021, SIA predicts a further 40% expansion, to $11.8 billion.
“While the volume of travel nurses on assignment grew in 2020 and 2021, much of the market size growth has been due to large increases in pay rates due to the imbalance of demand with supply,” notes Timothy Landhuis, North America director of research at SIA.
The active Facebook group “Traveling Nurse Jobs $5,000 a week and up” has more than 100,000 members and is peppered with listings and posts from recruiters. Job boards and groups like the Facebook group are the main ways that travel nurses find work. The business of AMN Healthcare, one of the largest health care staffing firms, is driven predominantly by word of mouth, CEO Susan Salka told a Bank of America virtual conference on the state of health care in May.
Health care staffing firms have posted impressive returns during the pandemic. AMN reported a whopping 60% bump in revenue over 2020 in its third quarter 2021. Cross Country Healthcare, another prominent firm, was even higher, with a 93% year-over-year increase in Q3 2021.
Usually, travel nurses are restricted to the specific states or regions where their nursing licenses are valid. During the first wave of the pandemic, those restrictions were waived by state governments, and travel nursing provided a framework to move people across state lines to where they were needed most, says Polly Pittman, director of the Health Workforce Research Center at George Washington University. By the time of the third wave, when COVID-19 was ubiquitous, nurses could still work almost anywhere. A bidding war ensued.
“I think travel nurses have an important function, in moderation,” says Pittman. But a large body of research shows that overuse of travel nurses isn’t good—for hospital bottom lines, for staff morale, or for patients.
During the pandemic, big hospital systems that can afford to pay have been able to hire the nurses they needed, says Pittman. Smaller health care facilities that provide care to some of those most vulnerable to COVID-19—like San Juan Regional, a community hospital with about 250 beds—have struggled to maintain staff and find the funds to pay for travelers.
Paying travel nurses has a serious effect on hospital bottom lines, which also impacts quality of care. NSI Nursing Solutions, a national health care staffing and retention agency, conducted a survey of over 3,000 hospitals in 2021 and estimated that hospitals could save an average of $3 million for every 20 travel nurse positions eliminated.
And it hurts relationships with the regular workforce. The widespread use of travel nurses during this pandemic has left staff nurses asking why hospitals can’t find the money to pay them better and hire more staff nurses to reduce their load, multiple sources including Pittman told Fortune. “It creates this downward spiral of low morale,” Pittman says.
Exhausted and overburdened, many staff nurses are leaving the profession altogether or, like Mogler, turning to travel nursing. “If you have a regular nurse making $50 an hour and a travel nurse making $150 an hour, that’s a big gap,” says Martha Dawson, president of the National Black Nurses Association. “I can’t hold that against the nurse, because for them that’s the current system that provides them with earning power.”
“A smoldering fire”
Jewel Scott, a postdoctoral nursing scholar at the University of Pittsburgh, compares nursing before the pandemic to a smoldering fire. If you were right beside the profession, you could see the heat of issues like low staffing ratios, ever-increasing responsibilities, and lack of institutional support flickering. Farther away, though, they were invisible. “Then COVID-19 hit, and [it was like] somebody poured a gallon of gasoline on the fire,” Scott says.
Once upon a time, nearly all nurses got a single one-year qualification—known as the LPN, or licensed practical nurse—and spent their entire career at one or two facilities. Nursing has professionalized significantly in the past 40 years, as health care generally has become more high-tech and specialized. Today, most American nurses get a three-year degree, which makes them RNs, or registered nurses, and many go on to further qualifications. They can become nurse practitioners, who work without the supervision of a doctor, go into more specialized positions like nurse anesthetist, and some even get Ph.D.s and go into academia.
All of those factors mean that acute care RNs, the mainstay of hospital and nursing home staffing, are in much shorter supply than they used to be. “There are always background shortages of nurses,” says Buerhaus. Local shortages can result from factors like several nurses on a ward all going on parental leave at the same time, or poaching by a competitor hospital, he says.
But trends in the past few decades have exacerbated structural shortages—and made the national workforce more vulnerable. The baby boomers who make up the bulk of the RN workforce have been retiring in large numbers since their generational workforce peaked in 2000. Pre-pandemic, about 70,000 of these nurses retired per year.
As a fraction of the total workforce, that’s not a huge percentage. “But when you think about the 20 and 30 years of experience that are leaving the workforce, that’s a big number to replace,” Buerhaus says. For the past few years, he and his colleagues have been hearing from hospitals that experienced nurses in complicated, demanding areas like intensive care and emergency care have been difficult to hire.
At present, about 3.08 million registered nurses are employed around the country, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Demand is predicted to grow by 9% by 2030—that means almost 300,000 nurses. But even though the mainstay of the labor force is retiring and demand for nurses is growing, nursing schools around the country are turning away qualified applicants—over 60,000 last year, the American Association of Colleges of Nursing reported in April.
There just aren’t enough faculty available to staff nursing schools—especially faculty who are people of color. They make up less than 10% of full nursing professors, Scott notes. About one-quarter of nurses identify as people of color. Studies show that outcomes are better for students who learn from people with a mix of ethnocultural backgrounds, regardless of the student's race. Students who are people of color especially benefit because they have the opportunity to be mentored by people who share their lived experiences and feel more like they belong.
In her case, Scott says having a Black nursing professor, Marva Price, reach out to talk to her about pursuing graduate studies led her to seek out further qualifications and eventually become a nursing professor herself. "Without a doubt, representation matters," she says.
And training nurses isn’t just about what happens in the classroom. Few hospitals have invested in nurse training on the job, says Joanne Spetz, director of the UCSF Institute for Health Policy studies. Now that the older nurses who were carrying so much weight are leaving, she says, there’s nobody who can do that vital teaching.
When the pandemic hit, these background issues became an urgent problem. “Hospitals were hit by this very fast, overwhelming demand for this very narrow specialty,” Buerhaus says. Trainee nurses and novice nurses were pressed into service in critical care, alongside the experienced nurses who remained. It’s a vicious cycle. “Poor staffing causes nurse attrition, and nurse attrition sustains poor staffing,” reads a recent commentary from the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. This cycle has become more intractable during COVID-19. A recent McKinsey & Company survey suggests that as many as 22% of the country’s nurses may plan to leave direct patient care in the next two years. The top issue for the survey’s more than 300 respondents: insufficient staffing. “During the pandemic, what is considered to be a safe number of patients to care for has been stretched to the absolute limit,” says Sue Anne Bell, a University of Michigan nursing professor who specializes in disaster preparedness and has been deployed to communities for four months during the pandemic.
In addition to lowering nurse job satisfaction, turnover dramatically increases labor force costs. Each RN lost to a hospital costs on average $40,038 in 2021, the NSI report finds. Those individual losses add up quickly: With each percentage point a hospital improves its turnover rate, it saves an average of $270,800 annually. Nurse turnover also detracts from quality of care, a team of researchers wrote in a recent quantitative study, “with potentially increased rates of medication errors, falls, or other nurse-sensitive outcomes including health care–associated infections.”
A “national crisis”
In that sense, travel nursing has created a tricky problem: While it elevates and provides relief for a small subset of burned-out nurses, it magnifies the issues making the job so hard in the first place. The long-standing issues that paved the way for the current crisis also aren't going away anytime soon, says Georges Benjamin, president of the American Public Health Association. They could be solved over time, he says, although it would take sustained effort.
But the first step in solving a problem is acknowledging that it exists. On Sept.1, the American Nurses Association submitted a letter to the Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra. The association asked him to declare “a national nurse staffing crisis and take immediate steps to develop and implement both short- and long-term solutions.”
“We do hope to hear from Secretary Becerra soon,” ANA president Ernest Grant told Fortune a week after the letter was submitted As of this article's publication in December, the ANA had received no response.
As for Mogler, the nurse that left his staff job for a travel position, he struggles with his choice. “I don’t feel great having left a very sick and needy population in a very understaffed hospital and coworkers who…were not able to take the same transition I did,” he says.
But the risk of handling a too-big workload and the feeling that his hospital wasn’t supporting him or his colleagues were too big an incentive to leave. As it is, he says, “I’m going to transition from one contract to the next until either the money is no longer worthwhile or situations start to improve and staff nursing becomes more appealing.”