居家辦公的日子是不是很有意思?
大約五分之三的經(jīng)理認(rèn)為,,遠(yuǎn)程辦公的時(shí)代正在結(jié)束,到今年年底,,員工們將徹底重返辦公室開(kāi)展工作,。
而且,為了讓員工回到辦公桌前,,他們顯然準(zhǔn)備采取一些強(qiáng)硬策略,。
就業(yè)背景調(diào)查公司GoodHire最近對(duì)3500名美國(guó)經(jīng)理進(jìn)行的調(diào)查顯示,大約77%的經(jīng)理表示,,如果員工拒絕重返辦公室,,他們會(huì)實(shí)施一些導(dǎo)致“嚴(yán)重后果”的措施,包括解雇或削減工資福利待遇,。
盡管許多調(diào)查顯示,,大多數(shù)員工更喜歡遠(yuǎn)程辦公或者與辦公室辦公二者混合的模式,但大多數(shù)管理者仍然認(rèn)為面對(duì)面辦公是最優(yōu)選,。谷歌(Google )前首席執(zhí)行官兼董事長(zhǎng)埃里克?施密特最近甚至加入了關(guān)于重返辦公室的辯論,。他說(shuō),在辦公室工作很有必要,,居家辦公時(shí)代似乎正在結(jié)束,,他為此感到高興。他說(shuō):“我不知道你們(在遠(yuǎn)程辦公中)是如何做好管理的,。實(shí)話實(shí)說(shuō),,我辦不到?!奔s有一半(51%)管理人員發(fā)自內(nèi)心地認(rèn)為,,他們的員工希望回辦公室辦公。
“顯然,,經(jīng)理們很糾結(jié),。”GoodHire首席運(yùn)營(yíng)官馬克斯?韋斯曼表示,,“一個(gè)組織的工作安排如果能讓大多數(shù)員工滿意,,對(duì)于招聘,、提升生產(chǎn)力、員工滿意度和留住員工都有好處,?!?/p>
勞動(dòng)力短缺的大環(huán)境下,員工對(duì)工作模式的選擇或許有更大話語(yǔ)權(quán)
一旦公司宣布啟動(dòng)重返辦公室計(jì)劃,,員工沒(méi)有太多選擇,,只能服從。除非部分崗位原本就是遠(yuǎn)程辦公崗,,這種崗位可能至少需要部分時(shí)間在辦公室外工作,。
根據(jù)《美國(guó)殘障人士法》(Americans with Disabilities Act,ADA)和州法規(guī),,部分員工(特別是有免疫系統(tǒng)受損,、慢性腎病、嚴(yán)重心臟病,、糖尿病和肥胖等問(wèn)題的員工,,他們可能更容易感染新冠)或許可以獲批遠(yuǎn)程辦公,但通常需要履行正式審查手續(xù),。
值得一提的是,,根據(jù)美國(guó)勞工統(tǒng)計(jì)局(Bureau of Labor Statistics)的數(shù)據(jù),3月份只有約10%的美國(guó)就業(yè)人員因?yàn)橐咔檫h(yuǎn)程辦公,。Workhuman的4月人力資源工作場(chǎng)所指數(shù)(Human Workplace Index)顯示,,超過(guò)半數(shù)(50.9%)員工表示,他們已經(jīng)要全天候在辦公室辦公了,。該指數(shù)是月度調(diào)查指數(shù),,每月對(duì)1,000名美國(guó)全職員工進(jìn)行調(diào)研。
但是,,如果僅僅因?yàn)楣咀约合胫胤缔k公室,,并不能保證一切都很順利。例如,,金融巨頭高盛(Goldman Sachs)今年2月重新開(kāi)放了紐約總部,,并要求1萬(wàn)名員工返回公司上班。第一天,,只有大約一半的人露面了,。
這是因?yàn)椋M管管理層威脅要采取嚴(yán)厲措施,,在勞動(dòng)力持續(xù)短缺的背景下,,員工們現(xiàn)在確實(shí)有一些話語(yǔ)權(quán)。美國(guó)2月共有1130萬(wàn)個(gè)崗位空缺,,這幾個(gè)月這個(gè)數(shù)字幾乎沒(méi)什么變化,。因此,,與其花大量的時(shí)間、精力和金錢重新招人取代那些不聽(tīng)話的員工,,一些雇主寧愿睜一只眼閉一只眼,。
但是,經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退的預(yù)警就在不遠(yuǎn)處,,如果現(xiàn)在冒著風(fēng)險(xiǎn)無(wú)視重返辦公室的要求,,到時(shí)可能會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)自己的名字赫然位于裁員名單的最頂端——如果到那時(shí)還沒(méi)被裁的話。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:Agatha
居家辦公的日子是不是很有意思?
大約五分之三的經(jīng)理認(rèn)為,,遠(yuǎn)程辦公的時(shí)代正在結(jié)束,到今年年底,,員工們將徹底重返辦公室開(kāi)展工作,。
而且,為了讓員工回到辦公桌前,,他們顯然準(zhǔn)備采取一些強(qiáng)硬策略,。
就業(yè)背景調(diào)查公司GoodHire最近對(duì)3500名美國(guó)經(jīng)理進(jìn)行的調(diào)查顯示,大約77%的經(jīng)理表示,,如果員工拒絕重返辦公室,,他們會(huì)實(shí)施一些導(dǎo)致“嚴(yán)重后果”的措施,包括解雇或削減工資福利待遇,。
盡管許多調(diào)查顯示,,大多數(shù)員工更喜歡遠(yuǎn)程辦公或者與辦公室辦公二者混合的模式,但大多數(shù)管理者仍然認(rèn)為面對(duì)面辦公是最優(yōu)選,。谷歌(Google )前首席執(zhí)行官兼董事長(zhǎng)埃里克?施密特最近甚至加入了關(guān)于重返辦公室的辯論,。他說(shuō),在辦公室工作很有必要,,居家辦公時(shí)代似乎正在結(jié)束,,他為此感到高興。他說(shuō):“我不知道你們(在遠(yuǎn)程辦公中)是如何做好管理的,。實(shí)話實(shí)說(shuō),,我辦不到?!奔s有一半(51%)管理人員發(fā)自內(nèi)心地認(rèn)為,,他們的員工希望回辦公室辦公。
“顯然,,經(jīng)理們很糾結(jié),。”GoodHire首席運(yùn)營(yíng)官馬克斯?韋斯曼表示,,“一個(gè)組織的工作安排如果能讓大多數(shù)員工滿意,,對(duì)于招聘,、提升生產(chǎn)力、員工滿意度和留住員工都有好處,?!?/p>
勞動(dòng)力短缺的大環(huán)境下,員工對(duì)工作模式的選擇或許有更大話語(yǔ)權(quán)
一旦公司宣布啟動(dòng)重返辦公室計(jì)劃,,員工沒(méi)有太多選擇,,只能服從。除非部分崗位原本就是遠(yuǎn)程辦公崗,,這種崗位可能至少需要部分時(shí)間在辦公室外工作,。
根據(jù)《美國(guó)殘障人士法》(Americans with Disabilities Act,ADA)和州法規(guī),,部分員工(特別是有免疫系統(tǒng)受損,、慢性腎病、嚴(yán)重心臟病,、糖尿病和肥胖等問(wèn)題的員工,,他們可能更容易感染新冠)或許可以獲批遠(yuǎn)程辦公,但通常需要履行正式審查手續(xù),。
值得一提的是,,根據(jù)美國(guó)勞工統(tǒng)計(jì)局(Bureau of Labor Statistics)的數(shù)據(jù),3月份只有約10%的美國(guó)就業(yè)人員因?yàn)橐咔檫h(yuǎn)程辦公,。Workhuman的4月人力資源工作場(chǎng)所指數(shù)(Human Workplace Index)顯示,,超過(guò)半數(shù)(50.9%)員工表示,他們已經(jīng)要全天候在辦公室辦公了,。該指數(shù)是月度調(diào)查指數(shù),,每月對(duì)1,000名美國(guó)全職員工進(jìn)行調(diào)研。
但是,,如果僅僅因?yàn)楣咀约合胫胤缔k公室,,并不能保證一切都很順利。例如,,金融巨頭高盛(Goldman Sachs)今年2月重新開(kāi)放了紐約總部,,并要求1萬(wàn)名員工返回公司上班。第一天,,只有大約一半的人露面了,。
這是因?yàn)椋M管管理層威脅要采取嚴(yán)厲措施,,在勞動(dòng)力持續(xù)短缺的背景下,,員工們現(xiàn)在確實(shí)有一些話語(yǔ)權(quán)。美國(guó)2月共有1130萬(wàn)個(gè)崗位空缺,,這幾個(gè)月這個(gè)數(shù)字幾乎沒(méi)什么變化,。因此,,與其花大量的時(shí)間、精力和金錢重新招人取代那些不聽(tīng)話的員工,,一些雇主寧愿睜一只眼閉一只眼,。
但是,經(jīng)濟(jì)衰退的預(yù)警就在不遠(yuǎn)處,,如果現(xiàn)在冒著風(fēng)險(xiǎn)無(wú)視重返辦公室的要求,,到時(shí)可能會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)自己的名字赫然位于裁員名單的最頂端——如果到那時(shí)還沒(méi)被裁的話。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:Agatha
Working from home. It was fun while it lasted?
About three out of five managers believe that remote work is on the wane and workers will be back in the office full-time by the end of this year.
And they’re apparently prepared to use some tough tactics to get workers back at their desks.
About 77% of managers said they’d be willing to implement “severe consequences”—including firing workers or cutting pay and benefits—on those who refuse to return to the office, according to a recent survey by employment background check company GoodHire of 3,500 American managers.
Although many surveys have shown that the majority of workers prefer remote and hybrid work structures, most managers still believe in-person work is best. Former Google CEO and chairman Eric Schmidt even recently weighed in about the return-to-work debate, saying that it's important people be at the office and he's happy the remote era seems to be ending. "I don’t know how you build great management [with remote work]. I honestly don’t," he said. And about half of managers, 51%, genuinely believe that their workers want to return to the office.
“Clearly, managers are struggling,” said Max Wesman, GoodHire’s chief operating officer. “Organizations that find a work arrangement that satisfies the majority of their workforce will benefit in the areas of recruitment, productivity, employee satisfaction, and retention.”
Workers may have more say in their job structure amid labor shortage
When companies announce return-to-office plans, workers don’t have a lot of choice but to comply. Unless a worker was specifically hired for a remote position, they are probably required to work out of the office at least part of the time.
Some workers (particularly those with health issues including an immunocompromised system, chronic kidney disease, serious heart conditions, diabetes, and obesity who may be more vulnerable to COVID-19 infections) may be able to get remote work accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and state regulations, but that typically requires a formal review process.
It's worth noting that only about 10% of employed Americans worked remotely in March because of COVID, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Over half of workers, 50.9%, reported being already required to return in-person full-time, according to Workhuman’s April Human Workplace Index, a monthly survey of 1,000 full-time U.S. workers.
But just because a company wants to head back to the office doesn’t mean it always goes smoothly. Financial giant Goldman Sachs, for example, reopened its New York headquarters in February and mandated its 10,000 employees return. Only about half showed up on the first day.
That’s because despite the threats of severe consequences, workers do have some leverage right now thanks to the ongoing worker shortage. The U.S. had 11.3 million open jobs available in February, and that number hasn’t really wavered in recent months. So rather than spend a lot of time, effort, and money replacing noncompliant employees right now, some employers are letting it ride.
But with warnings of a recession ahead, those workers who take their chances now by ignoring return-to-the-office mandates may find themselves to be at the top of the layoff list down the line—if not sooner.