有報(bào)道稱,十年前,,BuzzFeed總裁喬恩·斯坦伯格曾經(jīng)跪求公司創(chuàng)始人喬納·佩雷蒂接受迪士尼(Disney)開出的6.5億美元收購(gòu)要約,。
佩雷蒂拒絕了。
迪士尼首席執(zhí)行官羅伯特·艾格當(dāng)時(shí)表示,,這家新興的媒體公司“永遠(yuǎn)不會(huì)企及一旦加入我們后有可能獲得的價(jià)值,。”他或許說得沒錯(cuò),。BuzzFeed上周宣布,,將關(guān)閉曾經(jīng)斬獲普利策新聞獎(jiǎng)(Pulitzer Prize)的新聞部門,并裁員約180人——占員工總數(shù)的15%,。
據(jù)《衛(wèi)報(bào)》(The Guardian)報(bào)道,,佩雷蒂為自己的決定向員工道歉。
“我當(dāng)初決定大舉投資BuzzFeed News,,是因?yàn)槲曳浅O矚g他們的工作和使命,。這使我遲遲不能接受這樣的事實(shí),即大平臺(tái)不會(huì)提供一家專為社交媒體打造的優(yōu)質(zhì)免費(fèi)新聞機(jī)構(gòu)所需的分銷和資金支持,?!迸謇椎賹懙馈?/p>
在這家公司經(jīng)歷了最近的災(zāi)難后,,前BuzzFeed News總編輯本·史密斯透露了佩雷蒂在2013年拒絕那張令人瞠目的收購(gòu)支票的種種細(xì)節(jié),,并對(duì)他緣何做出這項(xiàng)決定發(fā)表了看法。
史密斯日前在《名利場(chǎng)》雜志(Vanity Fair)分享了他即將出版的新書《交通》(Traffic)的一段摘錄,。根據(jù)這段文字,,迪士尼當(dāng)時(shí)正在瘋狂地尋找一種方式,以期進(jìn)入越來越傾向于社交媒體受眾的媒體世界,。與此同時(shí),,BuzzFeed的讀者數(shù)量正在蓬勃增長(zhǎng)。史密斯詳盡描述了佩雷蒂是如何開始與迪士尼談判的——除了高達(dá)6億美元的要價(jià),,他還列出了一份交易必須滿足的要求清單,。
根據(jù)史密斯的說法,向“大師”艾格學(xué)習(xí),,是吸引佩雷蒂參與這筆交易的原因,。“對(duì)佩雷蒂來說,,有機(jī)會(huì)成為直接向現(xiàn)代媒體領(lǐng)域最成功的CEO匯報(bào)工作的13位高管之一,,是迪士尼最吸引人的地方,。”他寫道,。
在迪斯尼和BuzzFeed高管首次會(huì)面后,,史密斯、佩雷蒂和斯坦伯格討論了這筆收購(gòu)要約,。斯坦伯格極力敦促佩雷蒂接受這一提議,,并最終出現(xiàn)了跪在地上懇求創(chuàng)始人那一幕。
史密斯稱,,迪士尼后來給出了官方報(bào)價(jià):4.5億美元,,可能還會(huì)再追加2億美元。
“很明顯,,這是一個(gè)佩雷蒂幾乎無法拒絕的報(bào)價(jià),。”史密斯寫道,。
迪士尼和BuzzFeed都沒有回應(yīng)《財(cái)富》的置評(píng)請(qǐng)求,。
出現(xiàn)嫌隙
史密斯透露稱,幾個(gè)月后,,也就是11月,,迪士尼信心滿滿地認(rèn)為,,這筆“完全不用多想”的交易將順利達(dá)成,。
彼時(shí),佩雷蒂已經(jīng)受邀在這家影業(yè)公司的管理務(wù)虛會(huì)上向250位員工發(fā)表演講,,并要求在演講結(jié)束后與艾格私下交談,。
史密斯寫道,“艾格將佩雷蒂的演講安排在一個(gè)大帳篷中,,意在歡迎他加入這個(gè)大家庭,。”而這位互聯(lián)網(wǎng)企業(yè)家“像慣常那樣發(fā)表了一段頗為前衛(wèi)的獨(dú)白,?!?/p>
史密斯寫道,這場(chǎng)演講的反響不太好,。佩雷蒂講的許多笑話都是他在以前的演講中“循環(huán)使用過的”,。迪士尼的一位人力資源主管認(rèn)為,佩雷蒂對(duì)摩門教徒和猶太人的評(píng)論讓他成為一個(gè)“問題”,。
“佩雷蒂這輩子得到的笑聲從來沒有這么少過,。”史密斯寫道,?!八胂笾约涸诮酉聛淼穆殬I(yè)生涯中,,不得不向這些西裝革履的家伙解釋互聯(lián)網(wǎng),而他們則茫然地盯著他,,完全聽不懂他的笑話,。”
佩雷蒂走下舞臺(tái),,告訴艾格他不能接受這筆交易,。史密斯推測(cè)稱,他的前老板想要吹噓自己拒絕了業(yè)內(nèi)最具權(quán)勢(shì)的人之一,。他補(bǔ)充說,,佩雷蒂很可能想重現(xiàn)一個(gè)類似馬克·扎克伯格在2006年拒絕雅虎(Yahoo)以10億美元收購(gòu)Facebook的故事。
艾格不相信BuzzFeed會(huì)走上一條與Facebook相同的發(fā)展軌跡,。據(jù)說他當(dāng)時(shí)告訴一位高管同事:“他輸了,。那家公司永遠(yuǎn)不會(huì)企及一旦加入我們后有可能獲得的價(jià)值?!?/p>
“最愚蠢的決定”
BuzzFeed在2021年成功上市,,但這并不是高管們所希望的。從那時(shí)起,,與許多在線同行一樣,,隨著廣告資金流入視頻和影響力等新市場(chǎng),該公司受到了沉重打擊,。2022年,,BuzzFeed錄得4.36億美元的總收入,凈收入損失約為2.01億美元,。
與此同時(shí),,在收購(gòu)BuzzFeed交易告吹后的10年里,迪士尼的總收入幾乎翻了一番,。2013年,,華特迪士尼公司的收入剛剛超過450億美元——到2022年,這一數(shù)字躍升至近830億美元,。
佩雷蒂見證了BuzzFeed的轟然倒塌,。另一方面,在經(jīng)歷了幾年的動(dòng)蕩之后,,迪士尼在2022年力邀艾格重掌帥位,,穩(wěn)定大局。
“根據(jù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資圈的冷酷算計(jì),,佩雷蒂不接受迪士尼的收購(gòu)要約,,將作為數(shù)字媒體歷史上最愚蠢的決定而載入史冊(cè)。”史密斯寫道,。 (財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:任文科
有報(bào)道稱,,十年前,BuzzFeed總裁喬恩·斯坦伯格曾經(jīng)跪求公司創(chuàng)始人喬納·佩雷蒂接受迪士尼(Disney)開出的6.5億美元收購(gòu)要約,。
佩雷蒂拒絕了,。
迪士尼首席執(zhí)行官羅伯特·艾格當(dāng)時(shí)表示,這家新興的媒體公司“永遠(yuǎn)不會(huì)企及一旦加入我們后有可能獲得的價(jià)值,?!彼蛟S說得沒錯(cuò)。BuzzFeed上周宣布,,將關(guān)閉曾經(jīng)斬獲普利策新聞獎(jiǎng)(Pulitzer Prize)的新聞部門,,并裁員約180人——占員工總數(shù)的15%。
據(jù)《衛(wèi)報(bào)》(The Guardian)報(bào)道,,佩雷蒂為自己的決定向員工道歉,。
“我當(dāng)初決定大舉投資BuzzFeed News,是因?yàn)槲曳浅O矚g他們的工作和使命,。這使我遲遲不能接受這樣的事實(shí),,即大平臺(tái)不會(huì)提供一家專為社交媒體打造的優(yōu)質(zhì)免費(fèi)新聞機(jī)構(gòu)所需的分銷和資金支持?!迸謇椎賹懙?。
在這家公司經(jīng)歷了最近的災(zāi)難后,前BuzzFeed News總編輯本·史密斯透露了佩雷蒂在2013年拒絕那張令人瞠目的收購(gòu)支票的種種細(xì)節(jié),,并對(duì)他緣何做出這項(xiàng)決定發(fā)表了看法,。
史密斯日前在《名利場(chǎng)》雜志(Vanity Fair)分享了他即將出版的新書《交通》(Traffic)的一段摘錄。根據(jù)這段文字,,迪士尼當(dāng)時(shí)正在瘋狂地尋找一種方式,,以期進(jìn)入越來越傾向于社交媒體受眾的媒體世界,。與此同時(shí),,BuzzFeed的讀者數(shù)量正在蓬勃增長(zhǎng)。史密斯詳盡描述了佩雷蒂是如何開始與迪士尼談判的——除了高達(dá)6億美元的要價(jià),,他還列出了一份交易必須滿足的要求清單,。
根據(jù)史密斯的說法,向“大師”艾格學(xué)習(xí),,是吸引佩雷蒂參與這筆交易的原因,。“對(duì)佩雷蒂來說,,有機(jī)會(huì)成為直接向現(xiàn)代媒體領(lǐng)域最成功的CEO匯報(bào)工作的13位高管之一,,是迪士尼最吸引人的地方。”他寫道,。
在迪斯尼和BuzzFeed高管首次會(huì)面后,,史密斯、佩雷蒂和斯坦伯格討論了這筆收購(gòu)要約,。斯坦伯格極力敦促佩雷蒂接受這一提議,,并最終出現(xiàn)了跪在地上懇求創(chuàng)始人那一幕。
史密斯稱,,迪士尼后來給出了官方報(bào)價(jià):4.5億美元,,可能還會(huì)再追加2億美元,。
“很明顯,,這是一個(gè)佩雷蒂幾乎無法拒絕的報(bào)價(jià)?!笔访芩箤懙?。
迪士尼和BuzzFeed都沒有回應(yīng)《財(cái)富》的置評(píng)請(qǐng)求,。
出現(xiàn)嫌隙
史密斯透露稱,幾個(gè)月后,,也就是11月,,迪士尼信心滿滿地認(rèn)為,這筆“完全不用多想”的交易將順利達(dá)成,。
彼時(shí),,佩雷蒂已經(jīng)受邀在這家影業(yè)公司的管理務(wù)虛會(huì)上向250位員工發(fā)表演講,并要求在演講結(jié)束后與艾格私下交談,。
史密斯寫道,,“艾格將佩雷蒂的演講安排在一個(gè)大帳篷中,意在歡迎他加入這個(gè)大家庭,?!倍@位互聯(lián)網(wǎng)企業(yè)家“像慣常那樣發(fā)表了一段頗為前衛(wèi)的獨(dú)白?!?/p>
史密斯寫道,,這場(chǎng)演講的反響不太好。佩雷蒂講的許多笑話都是他在以前的演講中“循環(huán)使用過的”,。迪士尼的一位人力資源主管認(rèn)為,,佩雷蒂對(duì)摩門教徒和猶太人的評(píng)論讓他成為一個(gè)“問題”。
“佩雷蒂這輩子得到的笑聲從來沒有這么少過,?!笔访芩箤懙馈,!八胂笾约涸诮酉聛淼穆殬I(yè)生涯中,,不得不向這些西裝革履的家伙解釋互聯(lián)網(wǎng),而他們則茫然地盯著他,完全聽不懂他的笑話,?!?/p>
佩雷蒂走下舞臺(tái),告訴艾格他不能接受這筆交易,。史密斯推測(cè)稱,,他的前老板想要吹噓自己拒絕了業(yè)內(nèi)最具權(quán)勢(shì)的人之一。他補(bǔ)充說,,佩雷蒂很可能想重現(xiàn)一個(gè)類似馬克·扎克伯格在2006年拒絕雅虎(Yahoo)以10億美元收購(gòu)Facebook的故事,。
艾格不相信BuzzFeed會(huì)走上一條與Facebook相同的發(fā)展軌跡。據(jù)說他當(dāng)時(shí)告訴一位高管同事:“他輸了,。那家公司永遠(yuǎn)不會(huì)企及一旦加入我們后有可能獲得的價(jià)值,。”
“最愚蠢的決定”
BuzzFeed在2021年成功上市,,但這并不是高管們所希望的,。從那時(shí)起,與許多在線同行一樣,,隨著廣告資金流入視頻和影響力等新市場(chǎng),,該公司受到了沉重打擊。2022年,,BuzzFeed錄得4.36億美元的總收入,,凈收入損失約為2.01億美元。
與此同時(shí),,在收購(gòu)BuzzFeed交易告吹后的10年里,,迪士尼的總收入幾乎翻了一番。2013年,,華特迪士尼公司的收入剛剛超過450億美元——到2022年,,這一數(shù)字躍升至近830億美元。
佩雷蒂見證了BuzzFeed的轟然倒塌,。另一方面,,在經(jīng)歷了幾年的動(dòng)蕩之后,迪士尼在2022年力邀艾格重掌帥位,,穩(wěn)定大局,。
“根據(jù)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資圈的冷酷算計(jì),,佩雷蒂不接受迪士尼的收購(gòu)要約,,將作為數(shù)字媒體歷史上最愚蠢的決定而載入史冊(cè)?!笔访芩箤懙?。 (財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:任文科
A decade ago, BuzzFeed president Jon Steinberg reportedly got on his knees to beg its founder, Jonah Peretti, to accept a $650 million buyout deal from Disney.
Peretti refused.
At the time, Disney CEO Bob Iger said the up-and-coming media company would “never be worth what it would have been worth with us,” and he may have been proved right. BuzzFeed announced last week it is closing its Pulitzer Prize–winning news division and laying off around 180 members of staff—15% of its workforce.
Peretti apologized to staff for his decisions, the?Guardian?reported.
“I made the decision to overinvest in BuzzFeed News because I love their work and mission so much. This made me slow to accept that the big platforms wouldn’t provide the distribution or financial support required to support premium, free journalism purpose-built for social media,” Peretti wrote.
On the heels of the company’s latest catastrophe, former BuzzFeed News editor-in-chief Ben Smith revealed details of Peretti’s decision to turn down an eye-watering amount of money in 2013, and insights into why he made the decision.
In an excerpt shared with?Vanity Fair from his upcoming book Traffic, Smith suggests that Disney was frantically searching for a way to break into a media landscape increasingly angled toward social media engagement. Meanwhile, BuzzFeed was enjoying flourishing reader figures. Smith details how Peretti began negotiations with Disney by setting out a list of requests that he would want for the deal to go through, as well as an asking price of $600 million.
Learning from the “master” Iger was what attracted Peretti to the deal, according to Smith. “To Peretti, this was Disney’s most compelling aspect…to be one of 13 people reporting directly to the most successful CEO in modern media,” he writes.
Following the initial meeting between top Disney and BuzzFeed executives, Smith writes that he, Peretti, and Steinberg discussed the offer, with the latter pushing hard for Peretti to take it, eventually culminating with a scene in which Steinberg got down on his knees pleading for the founder to make the sale.
Disney’s official offer later came through, Smith claims, to buy the business for $450 million with the potential for an additional $200 million.
“It became clear that this was an offer that Peretti, almost, couldn’t refuse,” Smith writes.
Neither Disney nor BuzzFeed responded to Fortune’s request for comment.
Turning sour
Months later, in November, Smith suggests that Disney was fairly certain that the “no-brainer” of a deal would go through.
Peretti had been invited to speak at the moviemaker’s management retreat in front of 250 members of staff, and had asked to speak to Iger privately after his appearance.
Smith writes that “Iger had staged Peretti’s speech in a marquee slot to welcome him to the family,” and the internet entrepreneur “delivered one of his standard, edgy monologues.”
The speech, Smith writes, didn’t go down very well. Many of the jokes Peretti shared had been “recycled” from speaking engagements he’d done previously, while an HR executive for Disney observed that comments about Mormons and Jews made him a “problem,” according to Smith.
“Peretti had never gotten fewer laughs in his life,” Smith wrote. “He had a vision of himself having to explain the internet to these suits for the rest of his career while they stared blankly back at him and missed his jokes.”
Peretti came offstage and told Iger he couldn’t take the deal, Smith writes, theorizing that his old boss would want to brag about turning down one of the most powerful men in the industry. He added that Peretti would want to tout a story similar to Mark Zuckerberg’s decision to turn down?Yahoo’s $1 billion offering for Facebook in 2006.
Iger wasn’t convinced BuzzFeed would have the same trajectory as Facebook, with Iger reportedly telling a fellow executive: “F–k him, he loses. That company will never be worth what it would have been worth with us.”
“Dumbest decision”
BuzzFeed managed to push through to a?public offering in 2021, but it wasn’t what executives hoped for. And since then, like?many of its online counterparts, the company has been hit hard by advertising money moving into new markets like video and influencing. BuzzFeed’s gross revenue in 2022 was around $436 million, with a net income loss of around $201 million.
Disney, meanwhile, has nearly doubled its gross revenue in the 10 years since the BuzzFeed deal went cold. The Walt Disney Company brought in just over $45 billion in 2013—by 2022 it had jumped to nearly $83 billion.
While Peretti has presided over BuzzFeed’s collapse, Iger was asked to return to Disney in 2022 to steady the ship after a?tumultuous few years.
“In the cold terms of venture capital, Peretti’s—our—decision not to sell to Disney will go down as one of the dumbest in the history of digital media,” Smith writes.