凱投宏觀(Capital Economics)副首席市場經(jīng)濟學(xué)家喬納斯·戈特曼在周三的一份報告中表示:“可以說,2024年伊始,,金融市場經(jīng)歷了些許‘宿醉感’,。”事實上,,在2024年,,隨著生活恢復(fù)正常,股市的初步表現(xiàn)與2023年的暴漲形成鮮明對比,。以科技股為主的納斯達克綜合指數(shù)的表現(xiàn)最為糟糕,,該指數(shù)在2023年暴漲了近40%,但今年前兩個交易日跌幅超過了1.5%,。
戈特曼警告,,對于股市在新年前兩個交易日的表現(xiàn),,應(yīng)避免“過度解讀”,,但他認為,思考股市下跌的“合理的解釋”,,以及“它們對于今年的意義”,,有這些想法是合理的。
幾天前,,美股似乎即將勢不可擋地再創(chuàng)新高,,但這個預(yù)測卻出現(xiàn)了小小的失誤,這位經(jīng)濟學(xué)家強調(diào)了出現(xiàn)這種情況的三個關(guān)鍵原因,。戈特曼提出的一些原因是良性的,,但有些原因卻可能對全球經(jīng)濟和股市產(chǎn)生嚴重的長期影響。
1. 大漲之后自然會有盤整
首先是良性的原因。簡單來說,,股市的趨勢并非一條直線,。即使在經(jīng)濟繁榮時期,股市具備了所有暴漲的條件,,也依舊總會有下跌的時候,。
但在2023年最后幾個月,股市以一波驚人的上漲,,逆轉(zhuǎn)了這番趨勢,。2023年年底,標(biāo)普500指數(shù)連續(xù)九周上漲,,創(chuàng)下34年來持續(xù)時間最長的連續(xù)上漲,。為什么股市會在新年下跌?
戈德曼解釋稱:“第一個也是最簡單的解釋是,,2023年最后兩個月,,大多數(shù)資產(chǎn)類別都經(jīng)歷了強勢反彈,因此在某個時間點,,往往會出現(xiàn)一段時間的盤整或回調(diào),。”
基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施資本管理公司(Infrastructure Capital Management)創(chuàng)始人兼CEO杰伊·哈特菲爾德表示,,交易員的心理和在新年獲利的稅收優(yōu)勢,,影響了當(dāng)前的市場盤整周期。 “我們經(jīng)歷了連續(xù)大漲,,因此每個人都獲利豐厚,。所以他們會說:‘市場看起來有些疲軟,我為什么不先把一些收益變現(xiàn),?’
雖然近期股市下跌,,但哈特菲爾德表示,他對股市的樂觀展望“保持不變”,,包括他預(yù)測標(biāo)普500指數(shù)到年底將達到5,500點的目標(biāo)點位,。他認為,股市最近的表現(xiàn)不佳只是去年暴漲之后“正常的”盤整周期,,并不預(yù)示著還會有更糟糕的事情發(fā)生,。
2. 對央行“不太有利的”前景展望的擔(dān)憂
股市最近的疲軟背后,也有一些不太樂觀的原因,。凱投宏觀的戈特曼擔(dān)心,,12月,投資者為美聯(lián)儲結(jié)束加息而歡呼,,但本周,,美聯(lián)儲官員更加鷹派的言論,,可能令投資者大感意外。戈特曼在報告中提到了里士滿聯(lián)儲(Richmond Fed)主席托馬斯·巴爾金的說法,。他表示:“政策制定者……試圖打消人們認為美國即將降息的觀點,。”
周三,,巴爾金在羅利商會(Raleigh Chamber of Commerce)演講時表示,,雖然現(xiàn)在美國經(jīng)濟有可能實現(xiàn)“軟著陸”,但如果通脹問題依舊沒有解決,,美聯(lián)儲官員仍有可能在未來幾個月繼續(xù)加息,。戈德曼寫道:“這條信息或許現(xiàn)在開始產(chǎn)生了一些影響?!彼硎?,一些投資者認為,今年美聯(lián)儲降息的力度可能不及他們之前的預(yù)測,,這會影響股市,。
凱投宏觀認為,美聯(lián)儲加息依舊“令人難以置信”,。戈德曼寫道:“我們認為美聯(lián)儲和其他大多數(shù)主要國家的央行,,將在不久之后開始降低政策利率?!?/p>
他認為,,周三發(fā)布的聯(lián)邦公開市場委員會(FOMC)會議記錄顯示,美聯(lián)儲官員認為他們抑制通脹的努力取得了顯著進展,,并且他們預(yù)測將降息,,但他們依舊無法就降息時機和程度達成一致。會議記錄顯示,,政策利率路徑存在“極高的不確定性”,,這依舊令一些投資者擔(dān)憂。
杰富瑞集團(Jefferies)高級經(jīng)濟學(xué)家托馬斯·西蒙斯在周三的報告中解釋稱,,聯(lián)邦公開市場委員會的會議記錄比美聯(lián)儲主席杰羅姆·鮑威爾在12月的新聞發(fā)布會上的講話“更加鷹派”,。他認為,美聯(lián)儲官員的話經(jīng)常被“曲解”,,以避免“鴿派措辭”,。
3. 紅海航線受阻引發(fā)對通脹的擔(dān)憂
最后,隨著以色列繼續(xù)轟炸加沙地區(qū),,中東地區(qū)的局勢依舊緊張。胡塞武裝對紅海的貨輪發(fā)動襲擊,,而紅海是全球供應(yīng)鏈的關(guān)鍵節(jié)點,。每年,,全球約15%的水運交通,包括油輪和集裝箱貨輪,,需要途徑紅海向世界各地運輸從芯片到谷物等各種商品,。
周末,緊張局勢進一步升級,,在一艘貨輪遭到襲擊后,,美國海軍的直升機摧毀了三艘胡塞武裝的船只;作為回應(yīng),,伊朗部署了一艘軍艦,。
馬士基(Maersk)和地中海航運公司(Mediterranean Shipping Co.,MSC)等航運巨頭,,也暫停了紅海業(yè)務(wù),,導(dǎo)致許多集裝箱貨輪不得不繞道南非,向西方國家運送貨物,。投資者擔(dān)心,,紅海危機導(dǎo)致的航運成本上漲和供應(yīng)鏈問題,會引發(fā)新一輪通貨膨脹,,但凱投宏觀的戈爾曼表示,,這種情況不太可能發(fā)生。真正的風(fēng)險是以哈戰(zhàn)爭“升級成為更大規(guī)模的地區(qū)沖突”,。
他解釋稱:“這種情況可能對全球經(jīng)濟前景產(chǎn)生更嚴重的影響,,包括能源價格再次上漲,從而可能推遲美聯(lián)儲放寬貨幣政策的時間,,這會對大多數(shù)資產(chǎn)價格產(chǎn)生負面影響,。”
盡管中東緊張局勢不斷升級,,但戈爾曼表示他不太擔(dān)心產(chǎn)油國之間的沖突會進一步升級,。而且今年利率高于預(yù)期的威脅,也不足以改變他對股市的樂觀前景預(yù)測,。
他總結(jié)道:“總體而言,,我們認為大環(huán)境依舊有利于債市和股市。近期可能會出現(xiàn)一些動蕩,,但我們認為,,向更寬松的貨幣政策轉(zhuǎn)變,將成為2024年的主題,?!保ㄘ敻恢形木W(wǎng))
翻譯:劉進龍
審校:汪皓
凱投宏觀(Capital Economics)副首席市場經(jīng)濟學(xué)家喬納斯·戈特曼在周三的一份報告中表示:“可以說,2024年伊始,,金融市場經(jīng)歷了些許‘宿醉感’,?!笔聦嵣希?024年,,隨著生活恢復(fù)正常,,股市的初步表現(xiàn)與2023年的暴漲形成鮮明對比。以科技股為主的納斯達克綜合指數(shù)的表現(xiàn)最為糟糕,,該指數(shù)在2023年暴漲了近40%,,但今年前兩個交易日跌幅超過了1.5%。
戈特曼警告,,對于股市在新年前兩個交易日的表現(xiàn),,應(yīng)避免“過度解讀”,但他認為,,思考股市下跌的“合理的解釋”,,以及“它們對于今年的意義”,有這些想法是合理的,。
幾天前,,美股似乎即將勢不可擋地再創(chuàng)新高,但這個預(yù)測卻出現(xiàn)了小小的失誤,,這位經(jīng)濟學(xué)家強調(diào)了出現(xiàn)這種情況的三個關(guān)鍵原因,。戈特曼提出的一些原因是良性的,但有些原因卻可能對全球經(jīng)濟和股市產(chǎn)生嚴重的長期影響,。
1. 大漲之后自然會有盤整
首先是良性的原因,。簡單來說,股市的趨勢并非一條直線,。即使在經(jīng)濟繁榮時期,,股市具備了所有暴漲的條件,也依舊總會有下跌的時候,。
但在2023年最后幾個月,,股市以一波驚人的上漲,逆轉(zhuǎn)了這番趨勢,。2023年年底,,標(biāo)普500指數(shù)連續(xù)九周上漲,創(chuàng)下34年來持續(xù)時間最長的連續(xù)上漲,。為什么股市會在新年下跌,?
戈德曼解釋稱:“第一個也是最簡單的解釋是,2023年最后兩個月,,大多數(shù)資產(chǎn)類別都經(jīng)歷了強勢反彈,,因此在某個時間點,往往會出現(xiàn)一段時間的盤整或回調(diào)?!?/p>
基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施資本管理公司(Infrastructure Capital Management)創(chuàng)始人兼CEO杰伊·哈特菲爾德表示,,交易員的心理和在新年獲利的稅收優(yōu)勢,,影響了當(dāng)前的市場盤整周期,。 “我們經(jīng)歷了連續(xù)大漲,因此每個人都獲利豐厚,。所以他們會說:‘市場看起來有些疲軟,,我為什么不先把一些收益變現(xiàn)?’
雖然近期股市下跌,,但哈特菲爾德表示,,他對股市的樂觀展望“保持不變”,包括他預(yù)測標(biāo)普500指數(shù)到年底將達到5,500點的目標(biāo)點位,。他認為,,股市最近的表現(xiàn)不佳只是去年暴漲之后“正常的”盤整周期,并不預(yù)示著還會有更糟糕的事情發(fā)生,。
2. 對央行“不太有利的”前景展望的擔(dān)憂
股市最近的疲軟背后,,也有一些不太樂觀的原因。凱投宏觀的戈特曼擔(dān)心,,12月,,投資者為美聯(lián)儲結(jié)束加息而歡呼,但本周,,美聯(lián)儲官員更加鷹派的言論,,可能令投資者大感意外。戈特曼在報告中提到了里士滿聯(lián)儲(Richmond Fed)主席托馬斯·巴爾金的說法,。他表示:“政策制定者……試圖打消人們認為美國即將降息的觀點,。”
周三,,巴爾金在羅利商會(Raleigh Chamber of Commerce)演講時表示,,雖然現(xiàn)在美國經(jīng)濟有可能實現(xiàn)“軟著陸”,但如果通脹問題依舊沒有解決,,美聯(lián)儲官員仍有可能在未來幾個月繼續(xù)加息,。戈德曼寫道:“這條信息或許現(xiàn)在開始產(chǎn)生了一些影響?!彼硎?,一些投資者認為,今年美聯(lián)儲降息的力度可能不及他們之前的預(yù)測,,這會影響股市,。
凱投宏觀認為,美聯(lián)儲加息依舊“令人難以置信”,。戈德曼寫道:“我們認為美聯(lián)儲和其他大多數(shù)主要國家的央行,,將在不久之后開始降低政策利率,。”
他認為,,周三發(fā)布的聯(lián)邦公開市場委員會(FOMC)會議記錄顯示,,美聯(lián)儲官員認為他們抑制通脹的努力取得了顯著進展,并且他們預(yù)測將降息,,但他們依舊無法就降息時機和程度達成一致,。會議記錄顯示,政策利率路徑存在“極高的不確定性”,,這依舊令一些投資者擔(dān)憂,。
杰富瑞集團(Jefferies)高級經(jīng)濟學(xué)家托馬斯·西蒙斯在周三的報告中解釋稱,聯(lián)邦公開市場委員會的會議記錄比美聯(lián)儲主席杰羅姆·鮑威爾在12月的新聞發(fā)布會上的講話“更加鷹派”,。他認為,,美聯(lián)儲官員的話經(jīng)常被“曲解”,以避免“鴿派措辭”,。
3. 紅海航線受阻引發(fā)對通脹的擔(dān)憂
最后,,隨著以色列繼續(xù)轟炸加沙地區(qū),中東地區(qū)的局勢依舊緊張,。胡塞武裝對紅海的貨輪發(fā)動襲擊,,而紅海是全球供應(yīng)鏈的關(guān)鍵節(jié)點。每年,,全球約15%的水運交通,,包括油輪和集裝箱貨輪,需要途徑紅海向世界各地運輸從芯片到谷物等各種商品,。
周末,,緊張局勢進一步升級,在一艘貨輪遭到襲擊后,,美國海軍的直升機摧毀了三艘胡塞武裝的船只,;作為回應(yīng),伊朗部署了一艘軍艦,。
馬士基(Maersk)和地中海航運公司(Mediterranean Shipping Co.,,MSC)等航運巨頭,也暫停了紅海業(yè)務(wù),,導(dǎo)致許多集裝箱貨輪不得不繞道南非,,向西方國家運送貨物。投資者擔(dān)心,,紅海危機導(dǎo)致的航運成本上漲和供應(yīng)鏈問題,,會引發(fā)新一輪通貨膨脹,但凱投宏觀的戈爾曼表示,這種情況不太可能發(fā)生,。真正的風(fēng)險是以哈戰(zhàn)爭“升級成為更大規(guī)模的地區(qū)沖突”,。
他解釋稱:“這種情況可能對全球經(jīng)濟前景產(chǎn)生更嚴重的影響,包括能源價格再次上漲,,從而可能推遲美聯(lián)儲放寬貨幣政策的時間,,這會對大多數(shù)資產(chǎn)價格產(chǎn)生負面影響?!?/p>
盡管中東緊張局勢不斷升級,,但戈爾曼表示他不太擔(dān)心產(chǎn)油國之間的沖突會進一步升級,。而且今年利率高于預(yù)期的威脅,,也不足以改變他對股市的樂觀前景預(yù)測。
他總結(jié)道:“總體而言,,我們認為大環(huán)境依舊有利于債市和股市,。近期可能會出現(xiàn)一些動蕩,但我們認為,,向更寬松的貨幣政策轉(zhuǎn)變,,將成為2024年的主題?!保ㄘ敻恢形木W(wǎng))
翻譯:劉進龍
審校:汪皓
“It’s fair to say that financial markets have started 2024 with something of a mild hangover,” Jonas Goltermann, Capital Economics’ deputy chief markets economist, said in a Wednesday note. Indeed, as normal life resumes in 2024, the stock market’s early returns are sounding a different tune to their surge in 2023. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite is seeing the worst of it, falling more than 1.5% in the first two days of trading this year after soaring nearly 40% in 2023.
Goltermann cautioned against “reading too much into” stocks’ performance in the first couple of days of trading in the new year, but argued that it makes sense to think about “plausible explanations” for the drop and “what they imply for the year ahead.”
The economist highlighted three key reasons why stocks are experiencing a slight misstep on what seemed to be an inevitable and imminent rise to a record high just days ago. Some of Goltermann’s reasons are benign, but some could have serious long-term implications for the global economy and markets.
1. Consolidation is natural after big gains
Let’s start with the benign. To put it simply, stocks don’t move in a straight line. Even when the economy is booming and all the right conditions exist for equities to soar, there are always down days.
In the final few months of 2023, however, stocks bucked that trend with an incredible run of form. The S&P 500 rose for nine consecutive weeks to end 2023, the longest streak of gains in 34 years. So why are stocks down in the new year?
“The first and simplest explanation is that after a torrid rally across most asset classes over the last two months of 2023, a period of consolidation or correction was always likely at some point,” Goltermann explained.
Jay Hatfield, founder and CEO of Infrastructure Capital Management, noted that trader psychology—and the tax advantages of taking profits in the new year—are playing into the ongoing period of market consolidation. “We had a big run-up, so everybody has a bunch of gains. So they’re all saying: ‘Markets kind of look weak, why don’t I take some gains?’”
Despite the recent downturn, Hatfield said that his bullish outlook for stocks—which includes a 5,500 year-end price target for the S&P 500—“remains intact.” The recent underperformance is just a “normal” period of consolidation after last year’s surge, in his view, and not a harbinger of worse things to come.
2. Fears over a ‘less favorable’ outlook from central banks
But there may also be less benign reasons behind the stock market’s current weakness. Capital Economics’ Goltermann fears that investors celebrating the end of the Federal Reserve’s interest rate hiking campaign in December may have been surprised by more hawkish rhetoric from Fed officials this week. “Policymakers have … sought to push back against the perception that rate cuts are imminent,” Goltermann wrote, pointing to recent comments by Richmond Fed president Thomas Barkin.
Barkin said in a speech before the Raleigh Chamber of Commerce Wednesday that although a “soft landing” is now likely, Fed officials could still raise interest rates further in the coming months if inflation remains an issue. “Perhaps that message is starting to cut some ice,” Goltermann wrote, implying some investors believe there could be fewer interest rate cuts than they previously forecast this year, which would weigh on stocks.
Still, the idea that the Fed would hike interest rates is “highly implausible,” according to Capital Economics. “We think the Fed, and most other major central banks, will start cutting policy rates before long,” Goltermann wrote.
To his point, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting minutes released Wednesday showed Fed officials believe they’ve made substantial progress in taming inflation and expect to cut interest rates, but they still can’t agree on the timing and depth of those interest rate cuts. There was an “unusually elevated degree of uncertainty” around the policy rate path, the minutes read—and that still has some investors worried.
The FOMC minutes were “quite a bit more hawkish” than Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s December press conference, Jefferies senior economist Thomas Simons explained in a Wednesday note, arguing language was often “contorted” to avoid “dovish phrasing.”
3. Disrupted shipping routes in the Red Sea spark inflation concerns
Finally, tensions in the Middle East remain high as Israel continues its bombing campaign in Gaza. Houthi militants have attacked cargo vessels in the Red Sea, a critical juncture for global supply chains. Roughly 15% of the world’s shipping traffic makes its way through the Red Sea each year, including oil tankers and container ships transporting everything from semiconductors to grain.
In an escalation of tensions over the weekend, U.S. Navy helicopters destroyed three Houthi boats after an attack on a shipping vessel; Iran has responded by deploying a warship.
Shipping giants, including Maersk and the Mediterranean Shipping Co. (MSC), have suspended operations in the Red Sea as well, forcing many container ships to go around South Africa in order to deliver cargo to the West. The fear is that increased shipping costs and supply-chain issues from the Red Sea crisis will lead to a renewed surge in inflation, but Capital Economics’ Goltermann said that’s unlikely. The real risk is that the Israel-Hamas war “escalates to a wider regional conflict.”
“Such a development could have more serious implications for the global economic outlook, including the potential for another energy price spike that might set back the timing of monetary policy easing – with negative consequences for most asset prices,” he explained.
Despite rising tensions in the Middle East, further escalation of the conflict among oil producing nations isn’t a big concern for Goltermann. And the threat of higher than forecast interest rates this year isn’t enough to change his bullish outlook for stocks either.
“On balance, we think the big picture remains constructive for both bonds and equities,” he concluded. “Some further near-term turbulence may be likely, but we think that the shift towards less restrictive monetary policy will be the dominant theme of 2024.”