????受到發(fā)展中國(guó)家和某些國(guó)家的推動(dòng),，聯(lián)合國(guó)的官僚們突然靈機(jī)一動(dòng)，想到了控制全球通信和商務(wù)的美妙新點(diǎn)子：管制互聯(lián)網(wǎng),。

????在這個(gè)狂熱的選舉季,，這是極少數(shù)能把政治左中右派都團(tuán)結(jié)起來(lái)的話題之一。硅谷以外的商界領(lǐng)袖也該學(xué)聰明點(diǎn),，趕快行動(dòng)起來(lái)關(guān)注這一議題,。美國(guó)的反對(duì)有點(diǎn)來(lái)不及了，聯(lián)合國(guó)對(duì)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)征稅和管制的計(jì)劃已經(jīng)取得緩慢而堅(jiān)定的進(jìn)展,，12月份將在迪拜進(jìn)行條約談判,。

????理查德?格雷內(nèi)爾在2001年到2009年間擔(dān)任四任美國(guó)駐聯(lián)合國(guó)大使的發(fā)言人和顧問(wèn)，他指出：“讓聯(lián)合國(guó)或其它國(guó)際組織來(lái)管制互聯(lián)網(wǎng)意味著：人們只能在193個(gè)國(guó)家中達(dá)成最低限度的共識(shí),?！?/p>

????美國(guó)保守派就經(jīng)常抱怨聯(lián)合國(guó)總是成為這種最低限度共識(shí)的聚集地。最近的例子就是有人阻礙對(duì)敘利亞這樣的危險(xiǎn)分子采取行動(dòng)。現(xiàn)在這種擔(dān)憂居然要降臨到互聯(lián)網(wǎng)頭上,，大概是因?yàn)榛ヂ?lián)網(wǎng)傳播了太多的自由言論,，以及隨之而來(lái)的不滿和反抗。

????具體實(shí)施這一管制的是不為人知的聯(lián)合國(guó)機(jī)構(gòu)：國(guó)際電信聯(lián)盟（International Telecommunication Union,，ITU）,，它負(fù)責(zé)協(xié)調(diào)跨境事宜比如無(wú)線電頻譜和衛(wèi)星軌道。2012年12月的國(guó)際電信世界大會(huì)（官僚化的簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng)WCIT-12）上,，國(guó)際電信聯(lián)盟將試圖把其權(quán)限擴(kuò)展到互聯(lián)網(wǎng),。看起來(lái)還有短短6個(gè)月,，但其實(shí)國(guó)際電信聯(lián)盟的工作小組已經(jīng)打好了基礎(chǔ),。

????支持這一努力的是俄國(guó)總統(tǒng)弗拉基米爾?普京這樣的統(tǒng)治者，普京在去年公開(kāi)表達(dá)了建立對(duì)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的“國(guó)際控制”的想法,。這些勢(shì)力“可不是什么互聯(lián)網(wǎng)自由的堡壘,，”佛羅里達(dá)州參議員馬克?盧比奧在上個(gè)月的聽(tīng)證會(huì)上說(shuō)?！叭魏谓鼓承╆P(guān)鍵詞搜索的國(guó)家都不該成為國(guó)際互聯(lián)網(wǎng)監(jiān)管框架的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者,。”

????美國(guó)眾議院通信及技術(shù)委員會(huì)也將在星期四召開(kāi)聽(tīng)證會(huì),。

????發(fā)展中國(guó)家也在推動(dòng)對(duì)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的國(guó)際控制,，但其目標(biāo)除了政治控制，還在于尋求新的收入來(lái)源（允許外國(guó)電話公司對(duì)國(guó)際流量收費(fèi)是有待討論的提議之一）,。格雷內(nèi)爾在十年前就看到這種加強(qiáng)管制的努力已經(jīng)開(kāi)始抬頭,，他注意到聯(lián)合國(guó)的發(fā)展中國(guó)家成員積極參與那些可以強(qiáng)化它們自身對(duì)商務(wù)的控制和影響以及需要商界尋求它們的意見(jiàn)和批準(zhǔn)的議題。

????The bureaucrats at the United Nations, prodded by developing countries and exemplars of democracy like Russia and China, have hit on an enticing new way to control global communication and commerce: They want to regulate the Internet.

????It's one of those rare issues in this heated campaign season that is uniting the political left, right, and middle in Washington. Business leaders beyond Silicon Valley would be smart to sit up and take notice, too -- and fast. American opponents are being seriously outpaced by U.N. plans to tax and regulate that are already grinding forward in advance of a December treaty negotiation in Dubai.

????"Having the U.N. or any international community regulate the Internet only means you're going to have the lowest common denominator of 193 countries," notes Richard Grenell, who served as spokesman and adviser to four U.S. ambassadors to the U.N. between 2001 and 2009.

????That the U.N. too often acts as a repository of the world's lowest common denominator is a familiar complaint from American conservatives. Witness blocked attempts to take action against bad actors like Syria. Now those fears are being realized over the Internet, which has a nasty habit of spreading free speech -- and with it, discontent and revolt.

????The conduit is a little known U.N. agency called the International Telecommunication Union, which coordinates cross-border issues such as radio spectrum and satellite orbits. At the December 2012 World Conference on International Telecommunications in Dubai (bureaucratically titled the WCIT-12) the ITU will consider expanding its purview to the Internet. That may be six months away -- but ITU working groups are already laying the groundwork.

????Behind the effort are efficient censor machines like China, and autocrats like Russian President Vladimir Putin, who last year declared his desire to establish "international control" of the Internet. These are "not exactly bastions of Internet freedom," as Florida Republican Senator Marco Rubio put it during a hearing last month. "Any place that bans certain terms from search should not be a leader in an international Internet regulatory framework."

????The House Communications and Technology subcommittee convenes its own hearing Thursday.

????Also pushing for international controls are developing countries hungry not only for political control, but also for new sources of revenue. (Allowing foreign phone companies to collect fees on international traffic is one proposal under discussion.) Grenell, who saw the regulatory effort spring up from the beginning a decade ago, notes that developing countries at the U.N. "get excited about taking up global issues that will give them more control and influence over commerce, that require businesses to seek their input and approval."