????相比較而言,，人們越了解帕特里克?布萊克特，就越會被他的事跡所震驚,。從防空火炮到反潛裝備，從戰(zhàn)略轟炸到原子彈,，整個二戰(zhàn)之中,，布萊克特始終居于盟軍武器裝備的設計、理論以及決策的中心,。這位曾在1948年角逐諾貝爾獎的物理學家曾經是英國海軍的一名軍官,，他通過將簡單的數(shù)學、實驗以及數(shù)據(jù)分析進行極其精巧的跨學科綜合應用,，徹底改變了他所參與開發(fā)的每一件武器裝備,。

????經過在海軍和拉瑟福德郡卡文迪什實驗室的歷練，布萊克特深知如何把事情搞定,。他的傳記作者認為,，布萊克特早就應該為大眾所知?！安既R克特堪稱他那一代科學家中的傳奇人物,，因為他能將對物理學與數(shù)學的深厚功底與非凡的實踐技能結合起來，”布迪安斯基寫道,?！爱斔ミM行實際操作時，他還會展現(xiàn)出其他同事所稱之為的‘卓越的深思熟慮’的天賦,?！?/p>

????《布萊克特的戰(zhàn)爭》一書不僅是一本有關科學家或軍事家的傳記文學，它還是一本精心寫就,，有著詳實史料的精英科學家在戰(zhàn)爭時期動向的社會歷史著作,。本書中講述了希特勒崛起之后，德國的學術界開始驅逐猶太裔科學家,。而當時的英國,，無論從機構上還是組織上都沒有做好準備,，有效地利用亨利?蒂澤德和布萊克特這些由科學人才轉變而來的頂尖科學家，把他們變成掌握技術的企業(yè)家,。

????“傳統(tǒng)的軍事理論認為,，科學家的任務就是開發(fā)‘武器和裝備’然后交到部隊的手上就可以了，” 布迪安斯基寫道,?！暗侨缃瘢茖W家們卻可以深度參與到曾經只有軍事指揮官才能觸及的項目和行動中去,?！?/p>

????高大英俊、散發(fā)著領袖氣質的布萊克特自然就是其中的典型,。除了超高的智商和堂堂的儀表之外,，布萊克特的影響力還體現(xiàn)在他的分析、實驗以及建議可以令同事或是合作者產生醍醐灌頂感覺的天賦,。他能夠啟發(fā)他人的智慧,，激發(fā)他人的靈感。

????開發(fā)新的雷達系統(tǒng)或是在飛機上增加副油箱所需的分分秒秒都決定著前方成千上萬名士兵和平民百姓的生死,。訓練技術人員或是團隊成員以開發(fā)似乎不斷增多的技術改進開始變成一種不受贊賞的人力資源的負擔,。能令對科學一竅不通的軍隊指揮官理解精密的統(tǒng)計數(shù)據(jù)分析開始成為一種科學的藝術。布萊克特所開創(chuàng)的“運籌學”就是后勤學作為新的新經驗科學所取得的重大突破,。事實上,，他將軍事上的作戰(zhàn)區(qū)轉化為未來戰(zhàn)術和武器的試驗場。

????By contrast, the more closely one looks at Patrick Blackett, the more impressive he appears. From anti-aircraft gunnery to anti-submarine warfare, strategic bombing and the atomic bomb, Blackett was at or near the center of Allied military design, doctrine, and decision-making throughout the war. This British naval officer turned physicist (he went on to win the Nobel Prize in 1948) transformed every military service he counseled through the clever, interdisciplinary application of simple mathematics, experimentation, and data-driven advice.

????A polished product of the Navy and Rutherford's Cavendish Lab, Blackett knew how to get things done. He richly deserves to be better known; his biographer delivers. "Blackett would become legendary among his fellow scientists for his ability to combine physical insight, mathematical insight and extraordinary practical skills," writes Budiansky. "[H]e displayed what one colleague would call 'his remarkable facility' of thinking most deeply when he was working with his hands.'"

????Far more than a scientific or military biography, Blackett's War is also a finely wrought and well-sourced social history of elite science's wartime mobilization. Hitler's rise, German academe's expulsion of its Jewish scientists, and the growing realization that Britain was institutionally and organizationally unprepared to effectively utilize its scientific talent turned elite scientists like Henry Tizard and Blackett into technocratic entrepreneurs.

????"The traditional military view was that the scientists' role was to develop 'weapons and gadgets,' hand them over, and that was that," Budiansky notes. "But now scientists were intimately involved in what previously had been the exclusive purview of military commanders, in running operations."

????Tall, handsome, and blessed with command presence, Blackett led by example. His influence derived not just from an intimidating intellect and style but a genius in making his analyses, experiments, and proposals palatable to his military colleagues and collaborators. He made others think better. He inspired insight.

????The time needed to develop a new radar system or add "drop tanks" to planes determined the fates of tens of thousands of soldiers and civilians. Training technicians and crews to exploit seemingly incremental technical enhancements became a human capital imperative that was often underappreciated. The ability to make sophisticated statistical analyses persuasively accessible to innumerate commanders emerged as a new scientific art form. "Operational research" -- Blackett's baby -- broke through as a new empirical science of logistics. In effect, he turned military theaters of operations into research laboratories for future tactics and weaponry.