亚色在线观看_亚洲人成a片高清在线观看不卡_亚洲中文无码亚洲人成频_免费在线黄片,69精品视频九九精品视频,美女大黄三级,人人干人人g,全新av网站每日更新播放,亚洲三及片,wwww无码视频,亚洲中文字幕无码一区在线

????來(lái)自《Roughly Drafted》雜志的丹尼爾?伊蘭?迪爾格在一則帖子中寫(xiě)下這樣一段話：“如果要指出一些比不懂技術(shù)的媒體報(bào)道捏造的“位置門”虛假丑聞微妙之處更不恰當(dāng)?shù)男袨?，那么非歐美政客們打著調(diào)查的幌子進(jìn)行監(jiān)管的行為莫屬了。為了打探智能手機(jī)是否能夠記錄手機(jī)用戶所在位置,，他們竟然將整頓經(jīng)濟(jì),、住房、就業(yè)以及各類天災(zāi)人禍問(wèn)題撇在了一邊,。而事實(shí)上,，自從移動(dòng)電話出現(xiàn)以來(lái)，移動(dòng)基站塔和手機(jī)公司就一直在記錄手機(jī)用戶的位置信息,?！?對(duì)于其在美國(guó)科技網(wǎng)站AppleInsider的讀者而言，這番話可能有些太過(guò)隱諱,。

????圖片分享網(wǎng)站Tumblr 的合伙創(chuàng)始人,、Instapaper的創(chuàng)始人馬爾科?阿門特在一篇文章中發(fā)表了相似的觀點(diǎn)，他這樣寫(xiě)道：“如果人們知道Facebook和谷歌(Google)對(duì)自己的情況有多么了解,，他們會(huì)同樣驚恐,，甚至可能更加恐慌?！?/p>

????“一些網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商可自行存儲(chǔ)數(shù)據(jù)并永久保存,，用戶根本無(wú)法控制,。只要需要，他們隨時(shí)可以讀取你的‘私人’信息”,，并根據(jù)他人的匯總信息對(duì)你或其他任何人做出推斷,，甚至遠(yuǎn)超過(guò)你以為他們對(duì)你的了解。因?yàn)橐粋€(gè)安全性漏洞,，或是一樁有利可圖的商業(yè)交易,，成千上萬(wàn)人的私人信息頃刻間就會(huì)曝光。執(zhí)法機(jī)關(guān)通常易如反掌地就能獲得想要的任何信息,，因?yàn)楹芏喾?wù)商認(rèn)為,，為了保護(hù)用戶隱私而與執(zhí)法機(jī)關(guān)爭(zhēng)辯很不值得，這既耗時(shí)又費(fèi)錢,?！?/p>

????與專靠向廣告商出售用戶個(gè)人信息獲取收益的公司不同,，蘋(píng)果公司（Apple）最初是因?yàn)殇N售快速空間定位裝置能夠獲利而決定開(kāi)發(fā)相關(guān)功能,。這恰能解釋本周一爆出的據(jù)稱是史蒂夫?喬布斯與用戶的秘密往來(lái)電子郵件。

????問(wèn)：史蒂夫,，您能解釋一下在我的iPhone中,，內(nèi)置被動(dòng)式定位跟蹤工具有何必要性嗎？知道自己的準(zhǔn)確位置每時(shí)每刻都被記錄下來(lái),，這讓人感到非常不安,。或許你應(yīng)該在我改用摩托羅拉Droid手機(jī)之前,，做番解釋說(shuō)明,。Droid手機(jī)就不會(huì)跟蹤我。

????答：你錯(cuò)了,，摩托的手機(jī)會(huì)跟蹤你,，而我們不會(huì)。現(xiàn)在流傳的消息都不屬實(shí),。

????如果上述回信真的是喬布斯寫(xiě)的,，那他本應(yīng)該做出澄清，畢竟個(gè)中區(qū)別的隱情也的確非常微妙,。如果事實(shí)確如傳聞所說(shuō),，蘋(píng)果的媒體智囊團(tuán)仍然有大量機(jī)會(huì)可以詳細(xì)說(shuō)明這場(chǎng)爭(zhēng)辯的原委。蘋(píng)果和谷歌已被傳喚參加將在五月舉行的美國(guó)參議院司法聽(tīng)證會(huì),。法國(guó),、德國(guó)、意大利和韓國(guó)的立法委員已派專人調(diào)查此事,。而美國(guó)佛羅里達(dá)州聯(lián)邦法院也接到了兩位分別購(gòu)買了一部iPhone和iPad的用戶對(duì)蘋(píng)果公司的起訴,，他們要求蘋(píng)果退款,。

????"If there is anything less appropriate than a technologically ignorant media covering the subtleties of the manufactured LocationGate phony-scandal," writes Roughly Drafted's Daniel Eran Dilger, in a post perhaps too subtle for his usual AppleInsider audience, "it's the investigative policing by US and EU politicians who have suspended their efforts to rectify the economy, housing, employment and various other natural and man-made disasters in order to tackle the idea of whether smartphones might be recording one's location the same way mobile towers and phone companies have since the beginning of mobile telephony."

????"People would be similarly freaked out, if not more so, if they saw how much Facebook and Google know about them," wrote Marco Arment, the co-founder of Tumblr and creator of Instapaper, striking a similar theme:

????"Web services store the data themselves, outside of your control, and can keep it forever. They can access your 'private' data whenever they want, and they can aggregate everyone else's data to deduce even more about you (and everyone else) than what you thought they knew. A security breach — or a lucrative business deal — can expose the private data of thousands or millions of people at once, and law enforcement agencies can usually get whatever information they want extremely easily because it's not worth most services' time or money to argue with them."

????The difference between Apple, which is primarily motivated by the money it can make selling devices that can help you quickly locate your position in space, and companies that get most of their revenue selling information about you to advertisers, may explain the cryptic e-mail exchange attributed Monday to Steve Jobs:

????Q: Steve, Could you please explain the necessity of the passive location-tracking tool embedded in my iPhone? It's kind of unnerving knowing that my exact location is being recorded at all times. Maybe you could shed some light on this for me before I switch to a Droid. They don't track me.

????A: Oh yes they do. We don't track anyone. The info circulating around is false.

????Jobs, if that was indeed he, may have been making a distinction that was also a shade too subtle. If so, Apple's spin doctors will have plenty of opportunities to flesh out the argument. Apple (AAPL) and Google (GOOG) have both been summoned to appear before a Senate judiciary hearing in May. Investigations have been launched by French, German, Italian and South Korean regulators. And Apple has been sued in a Florida Federal court by two guys who bought an iPhone and an iPad and want their money back.