亚色在线观看_亚洲人成a片高清在线观看不卡_亚洲中文无码亚洲人成频_免费在线黄片,69精品视频九九精品视频,美女大黄三级,人人干人人g,全新av网站每日更新播放,亚洲三及片,wwww无码视频,亚洲中文字幕无码一区在线

????硅谷半導(dǎo)體公司美滿電子科技（Marvell Technologies）的共同創(chuàng)始人兼高管周秀文和戴偉立夫婦日前起訴高盛（Goldman Sachs）,，稱這家華爾街公司為協(xié)助做空美滿電子股票的空頭,，將這對(duì)夫婦經(jīng)紀(jì)賬戶中所持的美滿電子股票權(quán)屬進(jìn)行了不實(shí)標(biāo)注。

????周秀文和戴偉立夫婦的代理律師稱,，周二這項(xiàng)指控將加入這對(duì)夫婦一年前在舊金山起訴高盛的另一宗案件,。周秀文是美滿電子的首席執(zhí)行官，戴偉立是公司的通信主管,。

????這對(duì)夫婦在一年前提起的訴訟中指控高盛在金融危機(jī)鼎盛時(shí)期,，哄騙他們賣出一部分美滿電子股票來(lái)支撐保證金貸款，導(dǎo)致他們損失了1億美元,。此案將交由仲裁處理,。“從法律上講,，高盛無(wú)權(quán)借出不屬于它的股票,，”周秀文和戴偉立夫妻的代理律師、Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy律師事務(wù)所的費(fèi)爾?格里格雷稱,?！斑@起案子完全是高盛為了讓自己賬面上好看一點(diǎn)，結(jié)果導(dǎo)致我的客戶蒙受了巨大的損失,?！?/p>

????這對(duì)夫妻提出的新指控是,，2008年1月，高盛將他們兩人在高盛一個(gè)經(jīng)紀(jì)賬戶中所持的2,000萬(wàn)股美滿電子股票的權(quán)屬紀(jì)錄完全抹去了,。這對(duì)夫妻表示,，他們?cè)鈱⒏呤⒌拿旨尤牍善睓?quán)屬紀(jì)錄，這些股票應(yīng)被視為（高盛）代周秀文或戴偉立持有,，但結(jié)果他們兩人的名字完全被抹掉了,。

????當(dāng)時(shí)，投資者做空美滿電子的意愿高漲,。2007年9月中旬到2008年1月底之間,，空頭借入的美滿電子股票數(shù)量增長(zhǎng)超過(guò)了一倍，達(dá)到近3,700萬(wàn)股,。這對(duì)夫婦稱,，高盛將他們的股票置于自己名下后，就能把這些股票借給空頭,，大大增加了做空美滿電子的籌碼,。同時(shí)，高盛還向借入股票的對(duì)沖基金和其他投資者收取費(fèi)用,。如果借不到股票,，空頭的做空能力就會(huì)受到限制。周秀文和戴偉立表示,，他們肯定不會(huì)同意把自己的股票借給空頭,。這對(duì)夫妻稱，他們不確定高盛將多少股票借給了空頭,，或者到底借了沒(méi)有,。如今，周秀文和戴偉立已經(jīng)收回了這些股票,，此后一直沒(méi)有出售過(guò)這些股票,。

????高盛的一位女發(fā)言人拒絕置評(píng)公司是否曾將這對(duì)夫妻的美滿電子股票借給做空者?！案呤?duì)周秀文博士和戴偉立女士的指控一直予以否認(rèn),，目前此案已交由美國(guó)金融業(yè)監(jiān)管局（FINRA）仲裁，”高盛的一位女發(fā)言人稱,?！捌裎覀儾](méi)有收到任何新的指控?！?/p>

????近期,，高盛最近在對(duì)待客戶的方式方面遭到了一系列的聲討，公司被推到了風(fēng)口浪尖。3月份,，高盛一位剛離職的中層管理人士格雷格?史密斯在《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》（New York Times）專欄版撰文稱,，公司文化有毒，員工常將公司利益置于客戶利益之前,，但他并沒(méi)有給出具體的例子,。高盛否認(rèn)這些說(shuō)法。周秀文和戴偉立并不是唯一兩位對(duì)高盛融券業(yè)務(wù)發(fā)出抱怨之聲的人,。周一，《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》報(bào)道,，一位曾擔(dān)任對(duì)沖基金經(jīng)理的養(yǎng)雞場(chǎng)主認(rèn)為,，正是高盛融券部門(mén)對(duì)其交易的誤操作，導(dǎo)致他一度非常成功的15億美元基金倒閉,。

????Two Silicon Valley entrepreneurs suing Goldman Sachs say the Wall Street firm mislabeled shares in the couple's brokerage account in order to be able to assist short-sellers who were betting against the company the couple founded.

????A lawyer for the couple, Sehat Sutardja and Weili Dai, co-founders and executives of the semiconductor company Marvell Technologies (MRVL), said the claim will be added Tuesday to a suit the couple filed in a San Francisco court against Goldman a year ago. Sutardja is the CEO of Marvell. Dai is the company's manager of communications.

????The suit claims that Goldman cost the married couple $100 million by duping them into selling a portion of their Marvell shares to cover a margin loan at the height of the financial crisis. The case is set to go to arbitration. "Goldman had no legal right to lend out shares that didn't belong to the firm," says Phil Gregory of Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, who is representing Sutardja and Dai. "This whole case is about Goldman trying to make Goldman look better, and my clients suffering for it."

????In the amendment, the couple allege that in January 2008 Goldman (GS) removed Sutardja and Dai from the ownership records of 20 million shares of Marvell stock the couple held in a Goldman brokerage account. The couple say they agreed to allow Goldman to add the firm's name to the stock ownership records, but that the shares were supposed to classified as held for the benefit of either Sutardja or Dai. Instead, the couple says their names were removed completely.

????At the time, interest from investors wanting to bet against Marvell's stock was soaring. The number of Marvell shares borrowed by short-sellers more than doubled from 16 million in mid-September 2007 to nearly 37 million by the end of January. The couple allege that by putting their shares in Goldman's name, the firm was able to lend those shares to short-sellers, allowing them to increase their bets against Marvell. Goldman also collected fees from the hedge funds and other investors who borrowed the shares. Short-sellers are restricted from betting against stocks in which they have not secured the rights to borrow the shares. Sutardja and Dai say they would have objected to lending out their shares to investors who were betting against their company's stock. The couple say they do not know how many shares Goldman lent to short-sellers, or if the firm did at all. Sutardja and Dai have reclaimed the shares, which were never sold from their account.

????A Goldman spokeswoman declined to comment on whether the firm had lent the couple's Marvell shares to short-sellers. "Goldman Sachs has consistently denied and continues to fight Dr. Sutardja and Ms. Dai's claims, which are currently in arbitration with FINRA," says a Goldman spokeswoman. "We have not seen any new claims."

????Goldman has recently come under increasing fire for allegations about the way the firm treats its clients. In early March, a recently departed Goldman executive Greg Smith wrote in a New York Times op-ed that the firm's culture had become toxic and that its employees regularly put the firm's interests ahead of clients. He didn't offer specific examples. Goldman denies the claims. Sutardja and Dai are not the only ones to complain about Goldman's securities lending operations. On Monday, the New York Times reported that a former hedge fund manager turned chicken farmer believes Goldman's mishandling of his trades by the firm's securities lending division caused his once successful $1.5 billion fund to collapse.